Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond

An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: François Larouche, Farouk Tedjar, Kamyab Amouzegar, Georges Houlachi, Patrick Bouchard, George P. Demopoulos, Karim Zaghib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/801
id doaj-49ef6870241e42dd94bdfc3e9b04d064
record_format Article
spelling doaj-49ef6870241e42dd94bdfc3e9b04d0642020-11-25T01:14:52ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-02-0113380110.3390/ma13030801ma13030801Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and BeyondFrançois Larouche0Farouk Tedjar1Kamyab Amouzegar2Georges Houlachi3Patrick Bouchard4George P. Demopoulos5Karim Zaghib6Center of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, CanadaEnergy Research Institute, NTU, 1 Cleantech loop, Singapore 634672, SingaporeCenter of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, CanadaCentre de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec (CRHQ), 600, avenue de la Montagne, Shawinigan, QC G9N 7N5, CanadaCenter of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, CanadaMining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University Street, Montréal, QC H3A 0C5, CanadaCenter of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, CanadaAn exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/801recyclingli-ion batteryprocess reviewhydrometallurgydirect recycling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author François Larouche
Farouk Tedjar
Kamyab Amouzegar
Georges Houlachi
Patrick Bouchard
George P. Demopoulos
Karim Zaghib
spellingShingle François Larouche
Farouk Tedjar
Kamyab Amouzegar
Georges Houlachi
Patrick Bouchard
George P. Demopoulos
Karim Zaghib
Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Materials
recycling
li-ion battery
process review
hydrometallurgy
direct recycling
author_facet François Larouche
Farouk Tedjar
Kamyab Amouzegar
Georges Houlachi
Patrick Bouchard
George P. Demopoulos
Karim Zaghib
author_sort François Larouche
title Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_short Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_full Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_fullStr Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
title_sort progress and status of hydrometallurgical and direct recycling of li-ion batteries and beyond
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2020-02-01
description An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches.
topic recycling
li-ion battery
process review
hydrometallurgy
direct recycling
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/801
work_keys_str_mv AT francoislarouche progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT farouktedjar progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT kamyabamouzegar progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT georgeshoulachi progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT patrickbouchard progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT georgepdemopoulos progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
AT karimzaghib progressandstatusofhydrometallurgicalanddirectrecyclingofliionbatteriesandbeyond
_version_ 1725155957856534528