Factors Associated With Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications in ESRD

• Main Authors: José L. Hernández-Castillo, Joana Balderas-Juárez, Omar Jiménez-Zarazúa, Karen Guerrero-Toriz, Michelle P. Loeza-Uribe, Erika K. Tenorio-Aguirre, Jesús G. Mendoza-García, Jaime D. Mondragón
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
• Series: Kidney International Reports
• Subjects: catheter dysfunction; end-stage renal disease; removal; repositioning; urgent-start peritoneal dialysis
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024920314248

Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a well-tolerated alternative to hemodialysis (HD). The primary aim of this study was to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of ESRD patients, as well as the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical factors associated with urgent-start PD complications. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was performed on 102 patients with ESRD who merited urgent-start PD from January 2015 to June 2019. The primary clinical outcome measures were catheter leakage, dysfunction, and peritonitis, whereas the secondary outcomes were catheter removal, repositioning, and death. Statistical inferences were made with the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test and independent samples t tests. Results: One hundred two subjects (65 men, 63.7%) 56.2 ± 15.1 years old were included in this study; 64 of the subjects had diabetes and hypertension (62.7%). Catheter leakage occurred in 8 patients (7.8%), catheter dysfunction in 27 patients (26.5%), and peritonitis in 14 patients (13.7%); meanwhile, catheter removal occurred in 6 patients (5.9%), catheter repositioning in 21 patients (20.6%), and death in 3 patients (2.9%). Peritonitis was associated with younger age (i.e., 47.0 ± 16.8 vs. 57.6 ± 14.4 years; P = 0.014; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2–19.1; odds ratio [OR] 0.96; P = 0.018; 95% CI: 0.92–099), higher creatinine levels upon admission (i.e., 20.2 ± 9.8 vs. 14.1 ± 8.3; P = 0.014; 95% CI: −10.9 to −1.2), and heart failure (OR 4.79; P = 0.043; 95% CI: 1.05–21.88). Patients with abdominal hernia were 7.5 times more likely to have their catheter leak (OR 7.5; P = 0.036; 95% CI: 1.14–49.54). Catheter removal was associated with obesity (i.e., body mass index [BMI] of 31.6 ± 4.1 vs. 25.9 ± 4.9; P = 0.007; 95% CI: −9.8 to −1.6; OR 1.26; P = 0.013; 95% CI: 1.05–1.51) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease glomerular filtration rate (MDRD-GFR) (i.e., 2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 2.3; P = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.5–1.9). Conclusion: Peritonitis was associated with younger age, higher creatinine levels upon admission, and heart failure; meanwhile, catheter removal was linked to obesity and lower glomerular filtration rate. Compared with previous reports, our study included patients in which PD was initiated shortly after catheter insertion, making the intervention a true urgent-start PD. This study contributes to the existing urgent-start PD literature by providing evidence that urgent-start PD with catheter opening within 72 hours has limited complications, making it a relatively safe option.