Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND:Given the worldwide prevalence of NAFLD and NASH, there is a need to develop treatments to slow or reverse disease progression. GR-MD-02 (galactoarabino-rhamnogalaturonate) has been shown to reduce hepatic fibrosis in animal studies, and lower serum biomarkers of NASH fibrogenesis in huma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen A Harrison, Andrea Dennis, Martine M Fiore, Matt D Kelly, Catherine J Kelly, Angelo H Paredes, Jennifer M Whitehead, Stefan Neubauer, Peter G Traber, Rajarshi Banerjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6128474?pdf=render
id doaj-4a3e8be29d4749638ba6e15dc36714f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a3e8be29d4749638ba6e15dc36714f42020-11-25T01:56:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020305410.1371/journal.pone.0203054Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.Stephen A HarrisonAndrea DennisMartine M FioreMatt D KellyCatherine J KellyAngelo H ParedesJennifer M WhiteheadStefan NeubauerPeter G TraberRajarshi BanerjeeBACKGROUND:Given the worldwide prevalence of NAFLD and NASH, there is a need to develop treatments to slow or reverse disease progression. GR-MD-02 (galactoarabino-rhamnogalaturonate) has been shown to reduce hepatic fibrosis in animal studies, and lower serum biomarkers of NASH fibrogenesis in humans. The primary aim of this study was to determine the difference between four-months of treatment with GR-MD-02 or placebo in liver inflammation and fibrosis as measured by iron-corrected T1 (cT1) mapping, a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker that correlates with the extent of hepatic fibro-inflammatory disease. The secondary aims were to determine change in liver stiffness as measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and shear-wave ultrasonic elastography (LSM), and to explore test-retest repeatability of the three biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Thirty subjects (13 females, 46-71 years) with NASH and advanced fibrosis were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive 8 mg.kg-1 GR-MD-02 (via IV infusion) or placebo, administered biweekly over a 16-week period. Therapeutic efficacy was examined using cT1, MRE, and LSM. Statistical analyses on group differences in the biomarkers were performed using robust ANCOVA models adjusting for baseline measurement and additional covariates. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in cT1 (p = 0.16) between GR-MD-02 and placebo groups following a 16-week intervention. There was also no significant difference in liver stiffness, measured by MRE (p = 0.80) or LSM (p = 0.63), between groups. Examination of repeatability of the cT1, MRE and LSM revealed coefficient of variations of 3.1%, 11% and 40% respectively. CONCLUSIONS:8 mg.kg-1 of GR-MD-02 had no significant effect on non-invasive biomarkers of liver inflammation or fibrosis over a 4-month period. Histological confirmation was not available in this study. The high reproducibility of the primary outcome measure suggests that cT1 could be utilized for monitoring longitudinal change in patients with NASH.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6128474?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen A Harrison
Andrea Dennis
Martine M Fiore
Matt D Kelly
Catherine J Kelly
Angelo H Paredes
Jennifer M Whitehead
Stefan Neubauer
Peter G Traber
Rajarshi Banerjee
spellingShingle Stephen A Harrison
Andrea Dennis
Martine M Fiore
Matt D Kelly
Catherine J Kelly
Angelo H Paredes
Jennifer M Whitehead
Stefan Neubauer
Peter G Traber
Rajarshi Banerjee
Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stephen A Harrison
Andrea Dennis
Martine M Fiore
Matt D Kelly
Catherine J Kelly
Angelo H Paredes
Jennifer M Whitehead
Stefan Neubauer
Peter G Traber
Rajarshi Banerjee
author_sort Stephen A Harrison
title Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
title_short Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
title_full Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
title_fullStr Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
title_full_unstemmed Utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of GR-MD-02 in subjects with NASH and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
title_sort utility and variability of three non-invasive liver fibrosis imaging modalities to evaluate efficacy of gr-md-02 in subjects with nash and bridging fibrosis during a phase-2 randomized clinical trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Given the worldwide prevalence of NAFLD and NASH, there is a need to develop treatments to slow or reverse disease progression. GR-MD-02 (galactoarabino-rhamnogalaturonate) has been shown to reduce hepatic fibrosis in animal studies, and lower serum biomarkers of NASH fibrogenesis in humans. The primary aim of this study was to determine the difference between four-months of treatment with GR-MD-02 or placebo in liver inflammation and fibrosis as measured by iron-corrected T1 (cT1) mapping, a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker that correlates with the extent of hepatic fibro-inflammatory disease. The secondary aims were to determine change in liver stiffness as measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and shear-wave ultrasonic elastography (LSM), and to explore test-retest repeatability of the three biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Thirty subjects (13 females, 46-71 years) with NASH and advanced fibrosis were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive 8 mg.kg-1 GR-MD-02 (via IV infusion) or placebo, administered biweekly over a 16-week period. Therapeutic efficacy was examined using cT1, MRE, and LSM. Statistical analyses on group differences in the biomarkers were performed using robust ANCOVA models adjusting for baseline measurement and additional covariates. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in cT1 (p = 0.16) between GR-MD-02 and placebo groups following a 16-week intervention. There was also no significant difference in liver stiffness, measured by MRE (p = 0.80) or LSM (p = 0.63), between groups. Examination of repeatability of the cT1, MRE and LSM revealed coefficient of variations of 3.1%, 11% and 40% respectively. CONCLUSIONS:8 mg.kg-1 of GR-MD-02 had no significant effect on non-invasive biomarkers of liver inflammation or fibrosis over a 4-month period. Histological confirmation was not available in this study. The high reproducibility of the primary outcome measure suggests that cT1 could be utilized for monitoring longitudinal change in patients with NASH.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6128474?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenaharrison utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT andreadennis utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT martinemfiore utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT mattdkelly utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT catherinejkelly utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT angelohparedes utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT jennifermwhitehead utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT stefanneubauer utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT petergtraber utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
AT rajarshibanerjee utilityandvariabilityofthreenoninvasiveliverfibrosisimagingmodalitiestoevaluateefficacyofgrmd02insubjectswithnashandbridgingfibrosisduringaphase2randomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724980084080640000