Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns
Recent satellite observations yield estimates of the distribution of sea ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean. While these sensors were only placed in operation within the last few years, information from other sensors may assist us with estimating the distribution of sea ice thickness in th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/457 |
id |
doaj-4a9b419254da45478c412249412f36b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4a9b419254da45478c412249412f36b82020-11-24T20:47:56ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922016-05-018645710.3390/rs8060457rs8060457Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge CampaignsMark A. Tschudi0Julienne C. Stroeve1J. Scott Stewart2CCAR, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USANSIDC, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303, USAExploratory Thinking, Longmont, CO 80501, USARecent satellite observations yield estimates of the distribution of sea ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean. While these sensors were only placed in operation within the last few years, information from other sensors may assist us with estimating the distribution of sea ice thickness in the Arctic beginning in the 1980s. A previous study found that the age of sea ice is correlated to sea ice thickness from 2003 to 2006, but an extension of the temporal analysis is needed to better quantify this relationship and its variability from year to year. Estimates of the ice age/thickness relationship may allow the thickness record to be extended back to 1985, the beginning of our ice age dataset. Comparisons of ice age and thickness estimates derived from both ICESat (2004–2008) and IceBridge (2009–2015) reveal that the relationship between age and thickness differs between these two campaigns, due in part to the difference in area of coverage. Nonetheless, sea ice thickness and age exhibit a direct relationship when compared on pan-Arctic or regional spatial scales.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/457sea icecryosphereremote sensing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark A. Tschudi Julienne C. Stroeve J. Scott Stewart |
spellingShingle |
Mark A. Tschudi Julienne C. Stroeve J. Scott Stewart Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns Remote Sensing sea ice cryosphere remote sensing |
author_facet |
Mark A. Tschudi Julienne C. Stroeve J. Scott Stewart |
author_sort |
Mark A. Tschudi |
title |
Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns |
title_short |
Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns |
title_full |
Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns |
title_fullStr |
Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns |
title_sort |
relating the age of arctic sea ice to its thickness, as measured during nasa’s icesat and icebridge campaigns |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
Recent satellite observations yield estimates of the distribution of sea ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean. While these sensors were only placed in operation within the last few years, information from other sensors may assist us with estimating the distribution of sea ice thickness in the Arctic beginning in the 1980s. A previous study found that the age of sea ice is correlated to sea ice thickness from 2003 to 2006, but an extension of the temporal analysis is needed to better quantify this relationship and its variability from year to year. Estimates of the ice age/thickness relationship may allow the thickness record to be extended back to 1985, the beginning of our ice age dataset. Comparisons of ice age and thickness estimates derived from both ICESat (2004–2008) and IceBridge (2009–2015) reveal that the relationship between age and thickness differs between these two campaigns, due in part to the difference in area of coverage. Nonetheless, sea ice thickness and age exhibit a direct relationship when compared on pan-Arctic or regional spatial scales. |
topic |
sea ice cryosphere remote sensing |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/457 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markatschudi relatingtheageofarcticseaicetoitsthicknessasmeasuredduringnasasicesatandicebridgecampaigns AT juliennecstroeve relatingtheageofarcticseaicetoitsthicknessasmeasuredduringnasasicesatandicebridgecampaigns AT jscottstewart relatingtheageofarcticseaicetoitsthicknessasmeasuredduringnasasicesatandicebridgecampaigns |
_version_ |
1716809520977543168 |