Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries. Clinical studies have shown that early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has outcomes similar to early stage high grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G3) than to early stage low grade endometrioid adenocar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia, Dan Wang, Joshua Kesterson, Susanna Syriac, Kimberly Clark, Peter J Frederick, Shashikant Lele, Song Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-03-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3063241?pdf=render
id doaj-4a9c5054b814414e8166dadcb9de3c97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a9c5054b814414e8166dadcb9de3c972020-11-25T02:52:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-03-0163e1806610.1371/journal.pone.0018066Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.Paulette Mhawech-FaucegliaDan WangJoshua KestersonSusanna SyriacKimberly ClarkPeter J FrederickShashikant LeleSong LiuEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries. Clinical studies have shown that early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has outcomes similar to early stage high grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G3) than to early stage low grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G1). However, little is known about the origin of these different clinical outcomes. This study applied the whole genome expression profiling to explore the expression difference of stage I USC (n = 11) relative to stage I EAC-G3 (n = 11) and stage I EAC-G1 (n = 11), respectively.We found that the expression difference between USC and EAC-G3, as measured by the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), is consistently less than that found between USC and EAC-G1. Pathway enrichment analyses suggested that DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G3 are enriched for genes involved in signaling transduction, while DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G1 are enriched for genes involved in cell cycle. Gene expression differences for selected DEGs are confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR with a high validation rate.This data, although preliminary, indicates that stage I USC is genetically similar to stage I EAC-G3 compared to stage I EAC-G1. DEGs identified from this study might provide an insight in to the potential mechanisms that influence the clinical outcome differences between endometrial cancer subtypes. They might also have potential prognostic and therapeutic impacts on patients diagnosed with uterine cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3063241?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
Dan Wang
Joshua Kesterson
Susanna Syriac
Kimberly Clark
Peter J Frederick
Shashikant Lele
Song Liu
spellingShingle Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
Dan Wang
Joshua Kesterson
Susanna Syriac
Kimberly Clark
Peter J Frederick
Shashikant Lele
Song Liu
Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
Dan Wang
Joshua Kesterson
Susanna Syriac
Kimberly Clark
Peter J Frederick
Shashikant Lele
Song Liu
author_sort Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
title Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
title_short Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
title_full Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
title_fullStr Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
title_full_unstemmed Gene expression profiles in stage I uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
title_sort gene expression profiles in stage i uterine serous carcinoma in comparison to grade 3 and grade 1 stage i endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-03-01
description Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries. Clinical studies have shown that early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has outcomes similar to early stage high grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G3) than to early stage low grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G1). However, little is known about the origin of these different clinical outcomes. This study applied the whole genome expression profiling to explore the expression difference of stage I USC (n = 11) relative to stage I EAC-G3 (n = 11) and stage I EAC-G1 (n = 11), respectively.We found that the expression difference between USC and EAC-G3, as measured by the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), is consistently less than that found between USC and EAC-G1. Pathway enrichment analyses suggested that DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G3 are enriched for genes involved in signaling transduction, while DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G1 are enriched for genes involved in cell cycle. Gene expression differences for selected DEGs are confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR with a high validation rate.This data, although preliminary, indicates that stage I USC is genetically similar to stage I EAC-G3 compared to stage I EAC-G1. DEGs identified from this study might provide an insight in to the potential mechanisms that influence the clinical outcome differences between endometrial cancer subtypes. They might also have potential prognostic and therapeutic impacts on patients diagnosed with uterine cancer.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3063241?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT paulettemhawechfauceglia geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT danwang geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT joshuakesterson geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT susannasyriac geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT kimberlyclark geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT peterjfrederick geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT shashikantlele geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
AT songliu geneexpressionprofilesinstageiuterineserouscarcinomaincomparisontograde3andgrade1stageiendometrioidadenocarcinoma
_version_ 1724728763782004736