Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review

Abstract Background Over the past few decades, the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown considerably and along with it, scrutiny regarding its evidence base. While this is to be expected, and is in line with other health disciplines, research in CAM is confronted by n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasamin Veziari, Saravana Kumar, Matthew Leach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03371-6
id doaj-4aad021f79704730aa171f8abd34b310
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4aad021f79704730aa171f8abd34b3102021-07-18T11:46:52ZengBMCBMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies2662-76712021-07-0121111210.1186/s12906-021-03371-6Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping reviewYasamin Veziari0Saravana Kumar1Matthew Leach2UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South AustraliaUniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South AustraliaNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross UniversityAbstract Background Over the past few decades, the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown considerably and along with it, scrutiny regarding its evidence base. While this is to be expected, and is in line with other health disciplines, research in CAM is confronted by numerous obstacles. This scoping review aims to identify and report the strategies implemented to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. Methods The scoping review was undertaken using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, JBI and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened the records, following which data extraction was completed for the included studies. Descriptive synthesis was used to summarise the data. Results Of the 7945 records identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the oBSTACLES instrument as a framework, the included studies reported diverse strategies to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. All included studies reported the use of educational strategies and collaborative initiatives with CAM stakeholders, including targeted funding, to address a range of barriers. Conclusions While the importance of addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM has been recognised, to date, much of the focus has been limited to initiatives originating from a handful of jurisdictions, for a small group of CAM disciplines, and addressing few barriers. Myriad barriers continue to persist, which will require concerted effort and collaboration across a range of CAM stakeholders and across multiple sectors. Further research can contribute to the evidence base on how best to address these barriers to promote the conduct and application of research in CAM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03371-6Complementary and alternative medicineComplementary therapiesScoping reviewEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based medicineKnowledge translation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasamin Veziari
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Leach
spellingShingle Yasamin Veziari
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Leach
Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Complementary and alternative medicine
Complementary therapies
Scoping review
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-based medicine
Knowledge translation
author_facet Yasamin Veziari
Saravana Kumar
Matthew Leach
author_sort Yasamin Veziari
title Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
title_short Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
title_full Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
title_fullStr Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
title_sort addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
publisher BMC
series BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
issn 2662-7671
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Over the past few decades, the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown considerably and along with it, scrutiny regarding its evidence base. While this is to be expected, and is in line with other health disciplines, research in CAM is confronted by numerous obstacles. This scoping review aims to identify and report the strategies implemented to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. Methods The scoping review was undertaken using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, JBI and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened the records, following which data extraction was completed for the included studies. Descriptive synthesis was used to summarise the data. Results Of the 7945 records identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the oBSTACLES instrument as a framework, the included studies reported diverse strategies to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. All included studies reported the use of educational strategies and collaborative initiatives with CAM stakeholders, including targeted funding, to address a range of barriers. Conclusions While the importance of addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM has been recognised, to date, much of the focus has been limited to initiatives originating from a handful of jurisdictions, for a small group of CAM disciplines, and addressing few barriers. Myriad barriers continue to persist, which will require concerted effort and collaboration across a range of CAM stakeholders and across multiple sectors. Further research can contribute to the evidence base on how best to address these barriers to promote the conduct and application of research in CAM.
topic Complementary and alternative medicine
Complementary therapies
Scoping review
Evidence-based practice
Evidence-based medicine
Knowledge translation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03371-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yasaminveziari addressingbarrierstotheconductandapplicationofresearchincomplementaryandalternativemedicineascopingreview
AT saravanakumar addressingbarrierstotheconductandapplicationofresearchincomplementaryandalternativemedicineascopingreview
AT matthewleach addressingbarrierstotheconductandapplicationofresearchincomplementaryandalternativemedicineascopingreview
_version_ 1721295774365515776