Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Objectives. We aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion. Background. It remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen-hua Lei, Yan-biao Liao, Zi-jie Wang, Yuan-weixiang Ou, Jiay-yu Tsauo, Yi-jian Li, Tian-yuan Xiong, Zhen-gang Zhao, Xin Wei, Wei Meng, Yuan Feng, Mao Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7348964
id doaj-4ad02f97581f48428be4549fde914b27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ad02f97581f48428be4549fde914b272020-11-25T02:31:46ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/73489647348964Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic ValveWen-hua Lei0Yan-biao Liao1Zi-jie Wang2Yuan-weixiang Ou3Jiay-yu Tsauo4Yi-jian Li5Tian-yuan Xiong6Zhen-gang Zhao7Xin Wei8Wei Meng9Yuan Feng10Mao Chen11Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu 610041, ChinaObjectives. We aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion. Background. It remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonraphe bicuspid AS. Methods. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS and type-0 bicuspid aortic valve, who underwent TAVR at our institution between 2012 and 2017. TAVR outcomes were defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 recommendations. Results. Compared to patients with mixed cusp fusion (44/71), those with coronary cusp fusion (27/71) had a larger ellipticity index for the aortic annulus (21.9% ± 9.0% vs 15.6% ± 9.3%, p=0.007) and increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.1% ± 9.4% vs 26.9% ± 7.5%, p=0.04) but comparable rates of second valve implantation (15.9% vs 14.8%), mild paravalvular leakage (PVL, 38.5% vs 30.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM, 25.9% vs 15.9%), and 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.8%). Use of a first-generation transcatheter heart valve was associated with higher risk for mild PVL (odds ratio (OR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.14–16.75; p=0.03) but not PPM (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.22–2.62; p=0.67), whereas a larger oversizing ratio tended to be associated with a higher PPM rate (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.46–4.86; p=0.51) but lower incidence of mild PVL (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.19–1.35; p=0.17). Conclusions. In AS patients with type-0 bicuspid valves, cusp fusion morphology does not affect the procedural or clinical results of TAVR. Use of second-generation transcatheter heart valves may provide more favorable results in such patients. This trial is registered with NCT01683474.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7348964
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wen-hua Lei
Yan-biao Liao
Zi-jie Wang
Yuan-weixiang Ou
Jiay-yu Tsauo
Yi-jian Li
Tian-yuan Xiong
Zhen-gang Zhao
Xin Wei
Wei Meng
Yuan Feng
Mao Chen
spellingShingle Wen-hua Lei
Yan-biao Liao
Zi-jie Wang
Yuan-weixiang Ou
Jiay-yu Tsauo
Yi-jian Li
Tian-yuan Xiong
Zhen-gang Zhao
Xin Wei
Wei Meng
Yuan Feng
Mao Chen
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
author_facet Wen-hua Lei
Yan-biao Liao
Zi-jie Wang
Yuan-weixiang Ou
Jiay-yu Tsauo
Yi-jian Li
Tian-yuan Xiong
Zhen-gang Zhao
Xin Wei
Wei Meng
Yuan Feng
Mao Chen
author_sort Wen-hua Lei
title Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
title_short Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
title_full Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
title_fullStr Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
title_full_unstemmed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve
title_sort transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis having coronary cusp fusion versus mixed cusp fusion nonraphe bicuspid aortic valve
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objectives. We aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion. Background. It remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonraphe bicuspid AS. Methods. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS and type-0 bicuspid aortic valve, who underwent TAVR at our institution between 2012 and 2017. TAVR outcomes were defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 recommendations. Results. Compared to patients with mixed cusp fusion (44/71), those with coronary cusp fusion (27/71) had a larger ellipticity index for the aortic annulus (21.9% ± 9.0% vs 15.6% ± 9.3%, p=0.007) and increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.1% ± 9.4% vs 26.9% ± 7.5%, p=0.04) but comparable rates of second valve implantation (15.9% vs 14.8%), mild paravalvular leakage (PVL, 38.5% vs 30.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM, 25.9% vs 15.9%), and 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.8%). Use of a first-generation transcatheter heart valve was associated with higher risk for mild PVL (odds ratio (OR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.14–16.75; p=0.03) but not PPM (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.22–2.62; p=0.67), whereas a larger oversizing ratio tended to be associated with a higher PPM rate (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.46–4.86; p=0.51) but lower incidence of mild PVL (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.19–1.35; p=0.17). Conclusions. In AS patients with type-0 bicuspid valves, cusp fusion morphology does not affect the procedural or clinical results of TAVR. Use of second-generation transcatheter heart valves may provide more favorable results in such patients. This trial is registered with NCT01683474.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7348964
work_keys_str_mv AT wenhualei transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT yanbiaoliao transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT zijiewang transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT yuanweixiangou transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT jiayyutsauo transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT yijianli transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT tianyuanxiong transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT zhengangzhao transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT xinwei transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT weimeng transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT yuanfeng transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
AT maochen transcatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosishavingcoronarycuspfusionversusmixedcuspfusionnonraphebicuspidaorticvalve
_version_ 1724822091837997056