Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study

Background: Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation. Objective: The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and ve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peemongkon Wattananon, Komsak Sinsurin, Sirikarn Somprasong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Scientific Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S1013702520500043
id doaj-4b0bad289e074b8287e8cca018481395
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b0bad289e074b8287e8cca0184813952020-11-25T03:35:56ZengWorld Scientific PublishingHong Kong Physiotherapy Journal1013-70251876-441X2020-06-01401293710.1142/S101370252050004310.1142/S1013702520500043Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional studyPeemongkon Wattananon0Komsak Sinsurin1Sirikarn Somprasong2Motor Control and Neural Plasticity Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandBiomechanics and Sports Research Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandBackground: Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation. Objective: The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns. Methods: Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles). Results: Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference (MDD95), for greater pelvic motion (p=0.06), less lumbar motion (p=0.23) among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally (p<0.05) in the NSLBP group. A significant association (r=−0.8, p=0.02) was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity (ipsilateral: r=−0.6, p=0.14; contralateral: r=−0.6, p=0.16) in the NSLBP group. Conclusion: Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S1013702520500043lumbopelvic movement patternlumbopelvic muscle activation patternnon-specific low back pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peemongkon Wattananon
Komsak Sinsurin
Sirikarn Somprasong
spellingShingle Peemongkon Wattananon
Komsak Sinsurin
Sirikarn Somprasong
Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
lumbopelvic movement pattern
lumbopelvic muscle activation pattern
non-specific low back pain
author_facet Peemongkon Wattananon
Komsak Sinsurin
Sirikarn Somprasong
author_sort Peemongkon Wattananon
title Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
title_short Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
title_full Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study
title_sort association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: a cross-sectional study
publisher World Scientific Publishing
series Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
issn 1013-7025
1876-441X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation. Objective: The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns. Methods: Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles). Results: Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference (MDD95), for greater pelvic motion (p=0.06), less lumbar motion (p=0.23) among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally (p<0.05) in the NSLBP group. A significant association (r=−0.8, p=0.02) was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity (ipsilateral: r=−0.6, p=0.14; contralateral: r=−0.6, p=0.16) in the NSLBP group. Conclusion: Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.
topic lumbopelvic movement pattern
lumbopelvic muscle activation pattern
non-specific low back pain
url http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S1013702520500043
work_keys_str_mv AT peemongkonwattananon associationbetweenlumbopelvicmotionandmuscleactivationinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainduringforwardbendingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT komsaksinsurin associationbetweenlumbopelvicmotionandmuscleactivationinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainduringforwardbendingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT sirikarnsomprasong associationbetweenlumbopelvicmotionandmuscleactivationinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainduringforwardbendingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724552304473931776