Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis

Qualitative researchers place value on taking a closer, insider look at data as well as the subsequent data analysis and interpretation. On one end of the interpretive spectrum, researchers should be fully imbued with the coding-to-theorizing process by attending closely to the coding that leads to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charmaine Williamson, Annelien Van Rooyen, Christina Shuttleworth, Carol Binnekade, Deon Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920926885
id doaj-4b5a27e21d2f413b814514bc4c168f15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b5a27e21d2f413b814514bc4c168f152020-11-25T03:36:05ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692020-06-011910.1177/1609406920926885Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data AnalysisCharmaine Williamson0Annelien Van Rooyen1Christina Shuttleworth2Carol Binnekade3Deon Scott4 College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Tshwane, Gauteng, South Africa College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Tshwane, Gauteng, South Africa College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Tshwane, Gauteng, South Africa College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Tshwane, Gauteng, South Africa College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Tshwane, Gauteng, South AfricaQualitative researchers place value on taking a closer, insider look at data as well as the subsequent data analysis and interpretation. On one end of the interpretive spectrum, researchers should be fully imbued with the coding-to-theorizing process by attending closely to the coding that leads to their analysis. On the opposite end, are those researchers positioned in the positivist paradigm, who vividly question the “researcher-as-data” analysis and its explicit subjectivity. As a middle ground, qualitative researchers have worked collectively in broader teams and/or used independent, practiced coders to add rigor to the coding process. These approaches clearly reflect the philosophical positions researchers adopt in following a research process. For the current study, the authors used the framework of Wuity thinking, which prompts exploratory learning and draws on Eastern-based wisdom. By using Wuity as both a method and a theory, an independent coder with prior knowledge of the coding process oriented a team into the epistemic practices of qualitative coding. The study found that the subtleties of a Wuity lens show delicate and enabling thresholds for expanding mindsets and practices within epistemic communities. The authors concluded that a coding team, working in a different manner, may well advance novel points of departure for qualitative analysis.https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920926885
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charmaine Williamson
Annelien Van Rooyen
Christina Shuttleworth
Carol Binnekade
Deon Scott
spellingShingle Charmaine Williamson
Annelien Van Rooyen
Christina Shuttleworth
Carol Binnekade
Deon Scott
Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
author_facet Charmaine Williamson
Annelien Van Rooyen
Christina Shuttleworth
Carol Binnekade
Deon Scott
author_sort Charmaine Williamson
title Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
title_short Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
title_full Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
title_fullStr Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Wuity as a Philosophical Lens for Qualitative Data Analysis
title_sort wuity as a philosophical lens for qualitative data analysis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
issn 1609-4069
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Qualitative researchers place value on taking a closer, insider look at data as well as the subsequent data analysis and interpretation. On one end of the interpretive spectrum, researchers should be fully imbued with the coding-to-theorizing process by attending closely to the coding that leads to their analysis. On the opposite end, are those researchers positioned in the positivist paradigm, who vividly question the “researcher-as-data” analysis and its explicit subjectivity. As a middle ground, qualitative researchers have worked collectively in broader teams and/or used independent, practiced coders to add rigor to the coding process. These approaches clearly reflect the philosophical positions researchers adopt in following a research process. For the current study, the authors used the framework of Wuity thinking, which prompts exploratory learning and draws on Eastern-based wisdom. By using Wuity as both a method and a theory, an independent coder with prior knowledge of the coding process oriented a team into the epistemic practices of qualitative coding. The study found that the subtleties of a Wuity lens show delicate and enabling thresholds for expanding mindsets and practices within epistemic communities. The authors concluded that a coding team, working in a different manner, may well advance novel points of departure for qualitative analysis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920926885
work_keys_str_mv AT charmainewilliamson wuityasaphilosophicallensforqualitativedataanalysis
AT annelienvanrooyen wuityasaphilosophicallensforqualitativedataanalysis
AT christinashuttleworth wuityasaphilosophicallensforqualitativedataanalysis
AT carolbinnekade wuityasaphilosophicallensforqualitativedataanalysis
AT deonscott wuityasaphilosophicallensforqualitativedataanalysis
_version_ 1724551368595734528