In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing

Purpose: To review in vitro testing and simulation platforms that are in current use to predict in vivo performances of generic products as well as other situations to provide evidence for biowaiver and support drug formulations development. Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were used to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moawia M. Al-Tabakha, Muaed J. Alomar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/1/45
id doaj-4b6896f9380244469f88e30474913118
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b6896f9380244469f88e304749131182020-11-25T02:41:18ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232020-01-011214510.3390/pharmaceutics12010045pharmaceutics12010045In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence TestingMoawia M. Al-Tabakha0Muaed J. Alomar1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, P.O. Box 346, Ajman, UAEDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, P.O. Box 346, Ajman, UAEPurpose: To review in vitro testing and simulation platforms that are in current use to predict in vivo performances of generic products as well as other situations to provide evidence for biowaiver and support drug formulations development. Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were used to review published literature over the past 10 years. The terms used were &#8220;simulation AND bioequivalence&#8221; and &#8220;modeling AND bioequivalence&#8221; in the title field of databases, followed by screening, and then reviewing. Results: A total of 22 research papers were reviewed. Computer simulation using software such as GastroPlus&#8482;, PK-Sim<sup>&#174;</sup> and SimCyp<sup>&#174;</sup> find applications in drug modeling. Considering the wide use of optimization for in silico predictions to fit observed data, a careful review of publications is required to validate the reliability of these platforms. For immediate release (IR) drug products belonging to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III, difference factor (<i>&#402;</i><sub>1</sub>) and similarity factor (<i>&#402;</i><sub>2</sub>) are calculated from the in vitro dissolution data of drug formulations to support biowaiver; however, this method can be more discriminatory and may not be useful for all dissolution profiles. Conclusions: Computer simulation platforms need to improve their mechanistic physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and if prospectively validated within a small percentage of error from the observed clinical data, they can be valuable tools in bioequivalence (BE) testing and formulation development.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/1/45bioequivalencein silico pharmacokinetic simulationssimilarity factordissolutionpublication biasbiowaiverbiopharmaceutics classification system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moawia M. Al-Tabakha
Muaed J. Alomar
spellingShingle Moawia M. Al-Tabakha
Muaed J. Alomar
In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
Pharmaceutics
bioequivalence
in silico pharmacokinetic simulations
similarity factor
dissolution
publication bias
biowaiver
biopharmaceutics classification system
author_facet Moawia M. Al-Tabakha
Muaed J. Alomar
author_sort Moawia M. Al-Tabakha
title In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
title_short In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
title_full In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
title_fullStr In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing
title_sort in vitro dissolution and in silico modeling shortcuts in bioequivalence testing
publisher MDPI AG
series Pharmaceutics
issn 1999-4923
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose: To review in vitro testing and simulation platforms that are in current use to predict in vivo performances of generic products as well as other situations to provide evidence for biowaiver and support drug formulations development. Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were used to review published literature over the past 10 years. The terms used were &#8220;simulation AND bioequivalence&#8221; and &#8220;modeling AND bioequivalence&#8221; in the title field of databases, followed by screening, and then reviewing. Results: A total of 22 research papers were reviewed. Computer simulation using software such as GastroPlus&#8482;, PK-Sim<sup>&#174;</sup> and SimCyp<sup>&#174;</sup> find applications in drug modeling. Considering the wide use of optimization for in silico predictions to fit observed data, a careful review of publications is required to validate the reliability of these platforms. For immediate release (IR) drug products belonging to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III, difference factor (<i>&#402;</i><sub>1</sub>) and similarity factor (<i>&#402;</i><sub>2</sub>) are calculated from the in vitro dissolution data of drug formulations to support biowaiver; however, this method can be more discriminatory and may not be useful for all dissolution profiles. Conclusions: Computer simulation platforms need to improve their mechanistic physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and if prospectively validated within a small percentage of error from the observed clinical data, they can be valuable tools in bioequivalence (BE) testing and formulation development.
topic bioequivalence
in silico pharmacokinetic simulations
similarity factor
dissolution
publication bias
biowaiver
biopharmaceutics classification system
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/1/45
work_keys_str_mv AT moawiamaltabakha invitrodissolutionandinsilicomodelingshortcutsinbioequivalencetesting
AT muaedjalomar invitrodissolutionandinsilicomodelingshortcutsinbioequivalencetesting
_version_ 1724779073818853376