Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective: Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.Methods: Patients with surgically treated c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fengjie Zhu, Shuhan Sun, Kai Ba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00720/full
id doaj-4ba72ccfc8ff48b9a4b54cbd6f6f568c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ba72ccfc8ff48b9a4b54cbd6f6f568c2020-11-25T03:25:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-06-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00720519298Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell CarcinomaFengjie Zhu0Shuhan Sun1Kai Ba2Department of Oral Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Oral Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Oral Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaObjective: Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.Methods: Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.Results: Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.583).Conclusions: Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00720/fullPET-CTelective neck dissectionsurvival analysisearly stage tongue cancertongue squamous cell carcinoma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fengjie Zhu
Shuhan Sun
Kai Ba
spellingShingle Fengjie Zhu
Shuhan Sun
Kai Ba
Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Frontiers in Oncology
PET-CT
elective neck dissection
survival analysis
early stage tongue cancer
tongue squamous cell carcinoma
author_facet Fengjie Zhu
Shuhan Sun
Kai Ba
author_sort Fengjie Zhu
title Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort comparison between pet-ct–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection in ct1-2n0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Objective: Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.Methods: Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.Results: Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.583).Conclusions: Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.
topic PET-CT
elective neck dissection
survival analysis
early stage tongue cancer
tongue squamous cell carcinoma
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00720/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fengjiezhu comparisonbetweenpetctguidedneckdissectionandelectiveneckdissectioninct12n0tonguesquamouscellcarcinoma
AT shuhansun comparisonbetweenpetctguidedneckdissectionandelectiveneckdissectioninct12n0tonguesquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kaiba comparisonbetweenpetctguidedneckdissectionandelectiveneckdissectioninct12n0tonguesquamouscellcarcinoma
_version_ 1724595204394057728