Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection

Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgios Pafitanis, MD, Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons), Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast), Simon Myers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2018-02-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674
id doaj-4c0d3a321d1847deb89695d6a011c78a
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Georgios Pafitanis, MD
Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons)
Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast)
Simon Myers
spellingShingle Georgios Pafitanis, MD
Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons)
Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast)
Simon Myers
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Georgios Pafitanis, MD
Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons)
Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast)
Simon Myers
author_sort Georgios Pafitanis, MD
title Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_short Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_full Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_fullStr Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_sort pork belly: a simulation training model for intramuscular perforator dissection
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection. Methods:. An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model. Results:. Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection. Conclusions:. The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674
work_keys_str_mv AT georgiospafitanismd porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT damjanveljanoskibschons porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT alimghanemphdfrcsplast porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT simonmyers porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
_version_ 1724921775273279488
spelling doaj-4c0d3a321d1847deb89695d6a011c78a2020-11-25T02:09:55ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742018-02-0162e167410.1097/GOX.0000000000001674201802000-00008Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator DissectionGeorgios Pafitanis, MD0Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons)1Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast)2Simon Myers3From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection. Methods:. An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model. Results:. Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection. Conclusions:. The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674