Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674 |
id |
doaj-4c0d3a321d1847deb89695d6a011c78a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Georgios Pafitanis, MD Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons) Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast) Simon Myers |
spellingShingle |
Georgios Pafitanis, MD Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons) Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast) Simon Myers Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
author_facet |
Georgios Pafitanis, MD Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons) Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast) Simon Myers |
author_sort |
Georgios Pafitanis, MD |
title |
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection |
title_short |
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection |
title_full |
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection |
title_fullStr |
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection |
title_sort |
pork belly: a simulation training model for intramuscular perforator dissection |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
issn |
2169-7574 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection.
Methods:. An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model.
Results:. Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection.
Conclusions:. The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT georgiospafitanismd porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection AT damjanveljanoskibschons porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection AT alimghanemphdfrcsplast porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection AT simonmyers porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection |
_version_ |
1724921775273279488 |
spelling |
doaj-4c0d3a321d1847deb89695d6a011c78a2020-11-25T02:09:55ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742018-02-0162e167410.1097/GOX.0000000000001674201802000-00008Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator DissectionGeorgios Pafitanis, MD0Damjan Veljanoski, BSc (Hons)1Ali M. Ghanem, PhD, FRCS(Plast)2Simon Myers3From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.From the *The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; †Academic Plastic Surgery Group, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom; §The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and ¶The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.Background:. Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection. Methods:. An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model. Results:. Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection. Conclusions:. The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674 |