Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.

The present study aims at investigating the conceptions of happiness and unhappiness in a sample of Italian psychology undergraduates. Participants completed a questionnaire asking them to report the most important things that made them feel happy (happiness components) and those ones that made them...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Igor Sotgiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5157991?pdf=render
id doaj-4c3c22441fff47108e5f28d7d930781f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c3c22441fff47108e5f28d7d930781f2020-11-24T22:03:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011112e016774510.1371/journal.pone.0167745Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.Igor SotgiuThe present study aims at investigating the conceptions of happiness and unhappiness in a sample of Italian psychology undergraduates. Participants completed a questionnaire asking them to report the most important things that made them feel happy (happiness components) and those ones that made them feel unhappy (unhappiness components). Different measures of overall happiness and overall unhappiness were also obtained by asking respondents to assess to what extent each reported happiness and unhappiness component was present in their life, and by inviting them to provide a global judgment about their happiness and unhappiness. Results indicated that participants did not conceptualize happiness and unhappiness as perfect antonyms. Indeed, both investigated concepts encompassed a similar set of semantic components; however, the perceived salience of some of them - assessed in terms of frequency of citation and average ranking - significantly varied between happiness and unhappiness. With regard to the measurement of overall happiness and unhappiness, on average, respondents considered themselves as moderately happy and only slightly unhappy. However, a judgmental asymmetry was found when comparing global and specific evaluations of unhappiness. Theoretical and empirical implications of the study are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5157991?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Igor Sotgiu
spellingShingle Igor Sotgiu
Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Igor Sotgiu
author_sort Igor Sotgiu
title Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
title_short Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
title_full Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
title_fullStr Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
title_full_unstemmed Conceptions of Happiness and Unhappiness among Italian Psychology Undergraduates.
title_sort conceptions of happiness and unhappiness among italian psychology undergraduates.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The present study aims at investigating the conceptions of happiness and unhappiness in a sample of Italian psychology undergraduates. Participants completed a questionnaire asking them to report the most important things that made them feel happy (happiness components) and those ones that made them feel unhappy (unhappiness components). Different measures of overall happiness and overall unhappiness were also obtained by asking respondents to assess to what extent each reported happiness and unhappiness component was present in their life, and by inviting them to provide a global judgment about their happiness and unhappiness. Results indicated that participants did not conceptualize happiness and unhappiness as perfect antonyms. Indeed, both investigated concepts encompassed a similar set of semantic components; however, the perceived salience of some of them - assessed in terms of frequency of citation and average ranking - significantly varied between happiness and unhappiness. With regard to the measurement of overall happiness and unhappiness, on average, respondents considered themselves as moderately happy and only slightly unhappy. However, a judgmental asymmetry was found when comparing global and specific evaluations of unhappiness. Theoretical and empirical implications of the study are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5157991?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT igorsotgiu conceptionsofhappinessandunhappinessamongitalianpsychologyundergraduates
_version_ 1725831233249738752