Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834

Early academic histories of non-marital motherhood often focused on the minority of mothers who had several illegitimate children. Peter Laslett coined the phrase ‘the bastardy prone sub-society’ to describe them. More recent qualitative research has questioned the gendered persp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henry French
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Genealogy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/4/1/13
id doaj-4cbde94195aa416695fd8edadec14d12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cbde94195aa416695fd8edadec14d122020-11-25T02:06:05ZengMDPI AGGenealogy2313-57782020-01-01411310.3390/genealogy4010013genealogy4010013Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834Henry French0Department of History, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UKEarly academic histories of non-marital motherhood often focused on the minority of mothers who had several illegitimate children. Peter Laslett coined the phrase ‘the bastardy prone sub-society’ to describe them. More recent qualitative research has questioned the gendered perspectives underlying this label, and emphasised the complex, highly personal processes behind illegitimacy. By locating the social experience of illegitimacy, particularly multiple illegitimacy, within a broader genealogical and parochial context, this study tries to set the behaviour of particular individuals within a ‘community’ context in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It places illegitimacy alongside pre-nuptial pregnancy within the sample parish, but also focuses on the majority of illegitimate births that fell under the administration of the parish and became ‘bastardy’ cases. It examines the parish’s administrative responses, particularly its vigour in identifying and recovering money from putative fathers, and discusses the social circumstances of these fathers and mothers. It then goes on to reconstruct the inter-generational genealogy of a dense family network that linked several mothers and fathers of multiple illegitimate children. It highlights some significant and recurrent disparities of age and status within these family concentrations which lay beyond the limits of the courtship-centred model of illegitimacy.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/4/1/13illegitimacymotherhoodpovertypoor reliefeighteenth and nineteenth-century britain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry French
spellingShingle Henry French
Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
Genealogy
illegitimacy
motherhood
poverty
poor relief
eighteenth and nineteenth-century britain
author_facet Henry French
author_sort Henry French
title Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
title_short Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
title_full Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
title_fullStr Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
title_full_unstemmed Bastardy in Butleigh: Illegitimacy, Genealogies and the Old Poor Law in Somerset, 1762–1834
title_sort bastardy in butleigh: illegitimacy, genealogies and the old poor law in somerset, 1762–1834
publisher MDPI AG
series Genealogy
issn 2313-5778
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Early academic histories of non-marital motherhood often focused on the minority of mothers who had several illegitimate children. Peter Laslett coined the phrase ‘the bastardy prone sub-society’ to describe them. More recent qualitative research has questioned the gendered perspectives underlying this label, and emphasised the complex, highly personal processes behind illegitimacy. By locating the social experience of illegitimacy, particularly multiple illegitimacy, within a broader genealogical and parochial context, this study tries to set the behaviour of particular individuals within a ‘community’ context in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It places illegitimacy alongside pre-nuptial pregnancy within the sample parish, but also focuses on the majority of illegitimate births that fell under the administration of the parish and became ‘bastardy’ cases. It examines the parish’s administrative responses, particularly its vigour in identifying and recovering money from putative fathers, and discusses the social circumstances of these fathers and mothers. It then goes on to reconstruct the inter-generational genealogy of a dense family network that linked several mothers and fathers of multiple illegitimate children. It highlights some significant and recurrent disparities of age and status within these family concentrations which lay beyond the limits of the courtship-centred model of illegitimacy.
topic illegitimacy
motherhood
poverty
poor relief
eighteenth and nineteenth-century britain
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/4/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT henryfrench bastardyinbutleighillegitimacygenealogiesandtheoldpoorlawinsomerset17621834
_version_ 1724935204982751232