Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
To compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥1...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Adake |
id |
doaj-4cc206f74ae14a709c176b9377548cc0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4cc206f74ae14a709c176b9377548cc02020-11-24T23:54:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research2231-40400976-20942015-01-0162818510.4103/2231-4040.154543Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective studyPrabhakar AdakeH S SomashekarP K Mohammed RafeeqDilshad UmarBahija BasheerKusai BaroudiTo compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥140/90) of either gender, attending outpatient department of medicine, were included in the study. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients who have been prescribed tablet amlodipine 5-10 mg/day and the other 30 who have been prescribed tablet cilnidipine 10-20 mg/day orally by the consulting physician, depending upon the severity of hypertension were followed every fortnight, screened for the presence of pedal edema and blood pressure control over a period of 3 months. Antihypertensive efficacy between two groups was compared by unpaired t-test and incidence of pedal edema was compared by Fisher′s exact test. Of 30 patients in the amlodipine group, 19 patients presented with pedal edema (63.3%) and 2 patients (6.66%) in cilnidipine group presented with pedal edema during the study period. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pedal edema between amlodipine and cilnidipine group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine (P > 0.05). Both amlodipine and cilnidipine have shown equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by amlodipine.http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=AdakeBlood pressurecalcium channel blockersN-type and T-type calcium channels |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Prabhakar Adake H S Somashekar P K Mohammed Rafeeq Dilshad Umar Bahija Basheer Kusai Baroudi |
spellingShingle |
Prabhakar Adake H S Somashekar P K Mohammed Rafeeq Dilshad Umar Bahija Basheer Kusai Baroudi Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research Blood pressure calcium channel blockers N-type and T-type calcium channels |
author_facet |
Prabhakar Adake H S Somashekar P K Mohammed Rafeeq Dilshad Umar Bahija Basheer Kusai Baroudi |
author_sort |
Prabhakar Adake |
title |
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study |
title_short |
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study |
title_full |
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study |
title_sort |
comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: a prospective study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research |
issn |
2231-4040 0976-2094 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
To compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥140/90) of either gender, attending outpatient department of medicine, were included in the study. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients who have been prescribed tablet amlodipine 5-10 mg/day and the other 30 who have been prescribed tablet cilnidipine 10-20 mg/day orally by the consulting physician, depending upon the severity of hypertension were followed every fortnight, screened for the presence of pedal edema and blood pressure control over a period of 3 months. Antihypertensive efficacy between two groups was compared by unpaired t-test and incidence of pedal edema was compared by Fisher′s exact test. Of 30 patients in the amlodipine group, 19 patients presented with pedal edema (63.3%) and 2 patients (6.66%) in cilnidipine group presented with pedal edema during the study period. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pedal edema between amlodipine and cilnidipine group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine (P > 0.05). Both amlodipine and cilnidipine have shown equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by amlodipine. |
topic |
Blood pressure calcium channel blockers N-type and T-type calcium channels |
url |
http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Adake |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT prabhakaradake comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy AT hssomashekar comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy AT pkmohammedrafeeq comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy AT dilshadumar comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy AT bahijabasheer comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy AT kusaibaroudi comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy |
_version_ |
1725464142976909312 |