Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study

To compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prabhakar Adake, H S Somashekar, P K Mohammed Rafeeq, Dilshad Umar, Bahija Basheer, Kusai Baroudi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Adake
id doaj-4cc206f74ae14a709c176b9377548cc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cc206f74ae14a709c176b9377548cc02020-11-24T23:54:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research2231-40400976-20942015-01-0162818510.4103/2231-4040.154543Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective studyPrabhakar AdakeH S SomashekarP K Mohammed RafeeqDilshad UmarBahija BasheerKusai BaroudiTo compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥140/90) of either gender, attending outpatient department of medicine, were included in the study. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients who have been prescribed tablet amlodipine 5-10 mg/day and the other 30 who have been prescribed tablet cilnidipine 10-20 mg/day orally by the consulting physician, depending upon the severity of hypertension were followed every fortnight, screened for the presence of pedal edema and blood pressure control over a period of 3 months. Antihypertensive efficacy between two groups was compared by unpaired t-test and incidence of pedal edema was compared by Fisher′s exact test. Of 30 patients in the amlodipine group, 19 patients presented with pedal edema (63.3%) and 2 patients (6.66%) in cilnidipine group presented with pedal edema during the study period. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pedal edema between amlodipine and cilnidipine group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine (P > 0.05). Both amlodipine and cilnidipine have shown equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by amlodipine.http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=AdakeBlood pressurecalcium channel blockersN-type and T-type calcium channels
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Prabhakar Adake
H S Somashekar
P K Mohammed Rafeeq
Dilshad Umar
Bahija Basheer
Kusai Baroudi
spellingShingle Prabhakar Adake
H S Somashekar
P K Mohammed Rafeeq
Dilshad Umar
Bahija Basheer
Kusai Baroudi
Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
Blood pressure
calcium channel blockers
N-type and T-type calcium channels
author_facet Prabhakar Adake
H S Somashekar
P K Mohammed Rafeeq
Dilshad Umar
Bahija Basheer
Kusai Baroudi
author_sort Prabhakar Adake
title Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
title_short Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
title_full Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: A prospective study
title_sort comparison of amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in mild to moderate hypertensive individuals: a prospective study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
issn 2231-4040
0976-2094
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To compare amlodipine with cilnidipine on antihypertensive efficacy and incidence of pedal edema in hypertensive individuals. This was a three months prospective, observational study done at the tertiary care center of Karnataka, India. A total number of 60 (n = 60) newly diagnosed hypertensives (≥140/90) of either gender, attending outpatient department of medicine, were included in the study. Out of 60 patients, 30 patients who have been prescribed tablet amlodipine 5-10 mg/day and the other 30 who have been prescribed tablet cilnidipine 10-20 mg/day orally by the consulting physician, depending upon the severity of hypertension were followed every fortnight, screened for the presence of pedal edema and blood pressure control over a period of 3 months. Antihypertensive efficacy between two groups was compared by unpaired t-test and incidence of pedal edema was compared by Fisher′s exact test. Of 30 patients in the amlodipine group, 19 patients presented with pedal edema (63.3%) and 2 patients (6.66%) in cilnidipine group presented with pedal edema during the study period. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pedal edema between amlodipine and cilnidipine group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine (P > 0.05). Both amlodipine and cilnidipine have shown equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by amlodipine.
topic Blood pressure
calcium channel blockers
N-type and T-type calcium channels
url http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2015;volume=6;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Adake
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhakaradake comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
AT hssomashekar comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
AT pkmohammedrafeeq comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
AT dilshadumar comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
AT bahijabasheer comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
AT kusaibaroudi comparisonofamlodipinewithcilnidipineonantihypertensiveefficacyandincidenceofpedaledemainmildtomoderatehypertensiveindividualsaprospectivestudy
_version_ 1725464142976909312