Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants

The majority of commercial Cannabis sativa L. (cannabis) cultivators use a 12.0-hour uninterrupted dark period to induce flowering; however, scientific information to prove this is the optimal dark period for all genotypes is lacking. Knowing genotype-specific photoperiods may help to promote growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa Moher, Max Jones, Youbin Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2020-12-01
Series:HortScience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/56/1/article-p108.xml
id doaj-4ccd694acb61483ab580fa3f432e5997
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ccd694acb61483ab580fa3f432e59972021-02-01T19:01:50ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortScience2327-98342020-12-01561108113https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15452-20Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa PlantsMelissa MoherMax JonesYoubin ZhengThe majority of commercial Cannabis sativa L. (cannabis) cultivators use a 12.0-hour uninterrupted dark period to induce flowering; however, scientific information to prove this is the optimal dark period for all genotypes is lacking. Knowing genotype-specific photoperiods may help to promote growth by providing the optimal photoperiod for photosynthesis. To determine whether the floral initiation of cannabis explants respond to varied photoperiods in vitro, explants were grown under one of six photoperiod treatments: 12.0, 13.2, 13.8, 14.4, 15.0, and 16.0 hours per day for 4 weeks. The percentage of flowering explants was highest under 12.0- and 13.2-hour treatments. There were no treatment effects on the fresh weight, final height, and growth index. Based on the results, it is recommended that an uninterrupted dark period of at least 10.8 hours (i.e., 13.2-hour photoperiod) be used to induce flowering for the ‘802’ genotype. In vitro flowering could provide a unique and high-throughput approach to study floral/seed development and secondary metabolism in cannabis under highly controlled conditions. Further research should determine if this response is the same on the whole-plant level.https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/56/1/article-p108.xmlcannabisdark periodlower initiationphotoperiodtissue culture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa Moher
Max Jones
Youbin Zheng
spellingShingle Melissa Moher
Max Jones
Youbin Zheng
Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
HortScience
cannabis
dark period
lower initiation
photoperiod
tissue culture
author_facet Melissa Moher
Max Jones
Youbin Zheng
author_sort Melissa Moher
title Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
title_short Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
title_full Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
title_fullStr Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
title_full_unstemmed Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants
title_sort photoperiodic response of in vitro cannabis sativa plants
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
series HortScience
issn 2327-9834
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The majority of commercial Cannabis sativa L. (cannabis) cultivators use a 12.0-hour uninterrupted dark period to induce flowering; however, scientific information to prove this is the optimal dark period for all genotypes is lacking. Knowing genotype-specific photoperiods may help to promote growth by providing the optimal photoperiod for photosynthesis. To determine whether the floral initiation of cannabis explants respond to varied photoperiods in vitro, explants were grown under one of six photoperiod treatments: 12.0, 13.2, 13.8, 14.4, 15.0, and 16.0 hours per day for 4 weeks. The percentage of flowering explants was highest under 12.0- and 13.2-hour treatments. There were no treatment effects on the fresh weight, final height, and growth index. Based on the results, it is recommended that an uninterrupted dark period of at least 10.8 hours (i.e., 13.2-hour photoperiod) be used to induce flowering for the ‘802’ genotype. In vitro flowering could provide a unique and high-throughput approach to study floral/seed development and secondary metabolism in cannabis under highly controlled conditions. Further research should determine if this response is the same on the whole-plant level.
topic cannabis
dark period
lower initiation
photoperiod
tissue culture
url https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/56/1/article-p108.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT melissamoher photoperiodicresponseofinvitrocannabissativaplants
AT maxjones photoperiodicresponseofinvitrocannabissativaplants
AT youbinzheng photoperiodicresponseofinvitrocannabissativaplants
_version_ 1724314905348145152