Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to form teeth was lost in an ancestor of all modern birds, approximately 100-80 million years ago. However, experiments in chicken have revealed that the oral epithelium can respond to inductive signals from mouse mesench...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Girondot Marc, Delgado Sidney C, Sire Jean-Yves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-09-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/246
id doaj-4cdcd385087840e8a9f8c811d71a9bf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cdcd385087840e8a9f8c811d71a9bf82021-09-02T05:21:36ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482008-09-018124610.1186/1471-2148-8-246Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibilityGirondot MarcDelgado Sidney CSire Jean-Yves<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to form teeth was lost in an ancestor of all modern birds, approximately 100-80 million years ago. However, experiments in chicken have revealed that the oral epithelium can respond to inductive signals from mouse mesenchyme, leading to reactivation of the odontogenic pathway. Recently, tooth germs similar to crocodile rudimentary teeth were found in a chicken mutant. These "chicken teeth" did not develop further, but the question remains whether functional teeth with enamel cap would have been obtained if the experiments had been carried out over a longer time period or if the chicken mutants had survived. The next odontogenetic step would have been tooth differentiation, involving deposition of dental proteins.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using bioinformatics, we assessed the fate of the four dental proteins thought to be specific to enamel (amelogenin, AMEL; ameloblastin, AMBN; enamelin, ENAM) and to dentin (dentin sialophosphoprotein, DSPP) in the chicken genome. Conservation of gene synteny in amniotes allowed definition of target DNA regions in which we searched for sequence similarity. We found the full-length chicken AMEL and the only N-terminal region of DSPP, and both are invalidated genes. AMBN and ENAM disappeared after chromosomal rearrangements occurred in the candidate region in a bird ancestor.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These findings not only imply that functional teeth with enamel covering, as present in ancestral Aves, will never be obtained in birds, but they also indicate that these four protein genes were dental specific, at least in the last toothed ancestor of modern birds, a specificity which has been questioned in recent years.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/246
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Girondot Marc
Delgado Sidney C
Sire Jean-Yves
spellingShingle Girondot Marc
Delgado Sidney C
Sire Jean-Yves
Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Girondot Marc
Delgado Sidney C
Sire Jean-Yves
author_sort Girondot Marc
title Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
title_short Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
title_full Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
title_fullStr Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
title_full_unstemmed Hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
title_sort hen's teeth with enamel cap: from dream to impossibility
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2008-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to form teeth was lost in an ancestor of all modern birds, approximately 100-80 million years ago. However, experiments in chicken have revealed that the oral epithelium can respond to inductive signals from mouse mesenchyme, leading to reactivation of the odontogenic pathway. Recently, tooth germs similar to crocodile rudimentary teeth were found in a chicken mutant. These "chicken teeth" did not develop further, but the question remains whether functional teeth with enamel cap would have been obtained if the experiments had been carried out over a longer time period or if the chicken mutants had survived. The next odontogenetic step would have been tooth differentiation, involving deposition of dental proteins.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using bioinformatics, we assessed the fate of the four dental proteins thought to be specific to enamel (amelogenin, AMEL; ameloblastin, AMBN; enamelin, ENAM) and to dentin (dentin sialophosphoprotein, DSPP) in the chicken genome. Conservation of gene synteny in amniotes allowed definition of target DNA regions in which we searched for sequence similarity. We found the full-length chicken AMEL and the only N-terminal region of DSPP, and both are invalidated genes. AMBN and ENAM disappeared after chromosomal rearrangements occurred in the candidate region in a bird ancestor.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These findings not only imply that functional teeth with enamel covering, as present in ancestral Aves, will never be obtained in birds, but they also indicate that these four protein genes were dental specific, at least in the last toothed ancestor of modern birds, a specificity which has been questioned in recent years.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/246
work_keys_str_mv AT girondotmarc hensteethwithenamelcapfromdreamtoimpossibility
AT delgadosidneyc hensteethwithenamelcapfromdreamtoimpossibility
AT sirejeanyves hensteethwithenamelcapfromdreamtoimpossibility
_version_ 1721179616954023936