Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma

Background The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on early stage esophageal cancer is unknown. Here, we compared the outcomes after esophagectomy alone or nCRT plus surgery for clinically staged node‐negative esophageal cancer. Methods We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui‐Jiang Gao, Yu‐Cheng Wei, Lei Gong, Nan Ge, Bin Han, Guo‐Dong Shi, Zhen‐Tao Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13586
id doaj-4cf3e02e1396483d86770d1b88f356fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cf3e02e1396483d86770d1b88f356fb2020-11-25T03:16:29ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142020-09-011192618262910.1111/1759-7714.13586Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinomaHui‐Jiang Gao0Yu‐Cheng Wei1Lei Gong2Nan Ge3Bin Han4Guo‐Dong Shi5Zhen‐Tao Yu6Department of Thoracic Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaBackground The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on early stage esophageal cancer is unknown. Here, we compared the outcomes after esophagectomy alone or nCRT plus surgery for clinically staged node‐negative esophageal cancer. Methods We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with clinically node‐negative (cN0) esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2016 who underwent surgery alone or nCRT plus surgery. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were used to identify covariates associated with overall survival and cancer‐specific survival. Results A total of 1587 patients were retrospectively identified, of whom 49.8% (n = 791) received nCRT and 80.2% (n = 1273) were truly node‐negative diseases. For the entire cohort, surgery alone was associated with a statistically significant but modest absolute increase in survival outcomes (P < 0.01). After matching, nCRT was associated with improved five‐year overall survival for pT3‐4N0 (localized) disease (59.6% vs. 37.7%; P < 0.001) and pathological node‐positive disease (60.5% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.002). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the addition of nCRT for truly node‐negative patients with tumor length ≥ 3 cm, pT1‐2N0 (early‐staged) and localized disease were independent risk factors for survival than surgery alone (P < 0.01). Conclusions Compared with surgery alone, patients with cN0 esophageal cancer with pathological node‐positive or localized true node‐negative disease gain a significant survival benefit from nCRT. However, nCRT plus surgery was associated with decreased survival for early‐staged true node‐negative patients. This finding may have significant implications on the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with cN0 disease.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13586Esophageal carcinomaesophagectomyneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapysurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui‐Jiang Gao
Yu‐Cheng Wei
Lei Gong
Nan Ge
Bin Han
Guo‐Dong Shi
Zhen‐Tao Yu
spellingShingle Hui‐Jiang Gao
Yu‐Cheng Wei
Lei Gong
Nan Ge
Bin Han
Guo‐Dong Shi
Zhen‐Tao Yu
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
Thoracic Cancer
Esophageal carcinoma
esophagectomy
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
survival
author_facet Hui‐Jiang Gao
Yu‐Cheng Wei
Lei Gong
Nan Ge
Bin Han
Guo‐Dong Shi
Zhen‐Tao Yu
author_sort Hui‐Jiang Gao
title Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
title_short Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
title_full Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
title_sort neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node‐negative esophageal carcinoma
publisher Wiley
series Thoracic Cancer
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Background The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on early stage esophageal cancer is unknown. Here, we compared the outcomes after esophagectomy alone or nCRT plus surgery for clinically staged node‐negative esophageal cancer. Methods We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with clinically node‐negative (cN0) esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2016 who underwent surgery alone or nCRT plus surgery. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were used to identify covariates associated with overall survival and cancer‐specific survival. Results A total of 1587 patients were retrospectively identified, of whom 49.8% (n = 791) received nCRT and 80.2% (n = 1273) were truly node‐negative diseases. For the entire cohort, surgery alone was associated with a statistically significant but modest absolute increase in survival outcomes (P < 0.01). After matching, nCRT was associated with improved five‐year overall survival for pT3‐4N0 (localized) disease (59.6% vs. 37.7%; P < 0.001) and pathological node‐positive disease (60.5% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.002). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the addition of nCRT for truly node‐negative patients with tumor length ≥ 3 cm, pT1‐2N0 (early‐staged) and localized disease were independent risk factors for survival than surgery alone (P < 0.01). Conclusions Compared with surgery alone, patients with cN0 esophageal cancer with pathological node‐positive or localized true node‐negative disease gain a significant survival benefit from nCRT. However, nCRT plus surgery was associated with decreased survival for early‐staged true node‐negative patients. This finding may have significant implications on the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with cN0 disease.
topic Esophageal carcinoma
esophagectomy
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
survival
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13586
work_keys_str_mv AT huijianggao neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT yuchengwei neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT leigong neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT nange neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT binhan neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT guodongshi neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
AT zhentaoyu neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyplussurgeryversussurgeryaloneforclinicalnodenegativeesophagealcarcinoma
_version_ 1724635918249230336