The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects

An individual’s social style is determined by behavioral patterns in the interactions with their peers. Some studies suggest that social style may influence the way in which an individual’s performance is evaluated. We studied the effects that speakers’ and evaluators’ social styles have on the mark...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hector Ortiz, Agueda Garcia-Carrillo, Margarita González
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OmniaScience 2012-09-01
Series:Journal of Technology and Science Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/50
id doaj-4cfca3bfdb0d47c299f151cd29f5a595
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cfca3bfdb0d47c299f151cd29f5a5952020-11-24T22:25:53ZengOmniaScienceJournal of Technology and Science Education2013-63742012-09-0122687610.3926/jotse.5021The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projectsHector Ortiz0Agueda Garcia-Carrillo1Margarita González2UPCUPCUPCAn individual’s social style is determined by behavioral patterns in the interactions with their peers. Some studies suggest that social style may influence the way in which an individual’s performance is evaluated. We studied the effects that speakers’ and evaluators’ social styles have on the marks given for end-of-term presentations in a project engineering master’s course. The participants completed a self-evaluation exercise that classified their social styles into one of four categories: Driver, expressive, analytical, or amiable. Students individually rated the content and appearance of their classmates’ presentations. A statistical analysis of these scores revealed that the speaker’s social style had a significant effect on the marks received for content and appearance. The evaluator’s social style also demonstrated a statistically significant effect on the marks given for appearance, though not for content. Students with expressive social style received the highest scores, while the analytical style received the lowest scores. These results reiterate the necessity to train students as evaluators in order to reduce bias when evaluating their classmates and co-workers during their academic and professional careers.http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/50Social style, rating, evaluation, presentations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hector Ortiz
Agueda Garcia-Carrillo
Margarita González
spellingShingle Hector Ortiz
Agueda Garcia-Carrillo
Margarita González
The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
Journal of Technology and Science Education
Social style, rating, evaluation, presentations
author_facet Hector Ortiz
Agueda Garcia-Carrillo
Margarita González
author_sort Hector Ortiz
title The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
title_short The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
title_full The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
title_fullStr The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
title_full_unstemmed The influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
title_sort influence of social style in evaluating academic presentations of engineering projects
publisher OmniaScience
series Journal of Technology and Science Education
issn 2013-6374
publishDate 2012-09-01
description An individual’s social style is determined by behavioral patterns in the interactions with their peers. Some studies suggest that social style may influence the way in which an individual’s performance is evaluated. We studied the effects that speakers’ and evaluators’ social styles have on the marks given for end-of-term presentations in a project engineering master’s course. The participants completed a self-evaluation exercise that classified their social styles into one of four categories: Driver, expressive, analytical, or amiable. Students individually rated the content and appearance of their classmates’ presentations. A statistical analysis of these scores revealed that the speaker’s social style had a significant effect on the marks received for content and appearance. The evaluator’s social style also demonstrated a statistically significant effect on the marks given for appearance, though not for content. Students with expressive social style received the highest scores, while the analytical style received the lowest scores. These results reiterate the necessity to train students as evaluators in order to reduce bias when evaluating their classmates and co-workers during their academic and professional careers.
topic Social style, rating, evaluation, presentations
url http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/50
work_keys_str_mv AT hectorortiz theinfluenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
AT aguedagarciacarrillo theinfluenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
AT margaritagonzalez theinfluenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
AT hectorortiz influenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
AT aguedagarciacarrillo influenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
AT margaritagonzalez influenceofsocialstyleinevaluatingacademicpresentationsofengineeringprojects
_version_ 1725755831211786240