A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants

To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH<sub>4</sub> production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH<sub>4</sub>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yiguang Zhao, Xuemei Nan, Liang Yang, Shanshan Zheng, Linshu Jiang, Benhai Xiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/6/1004
Description
Summary:To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH<sub>4</sub> production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH<sub>4</sub> measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH<sub>4</sub> detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF<sub>6</sub> and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH<sub>4</sub> detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH<sub>4</sub> emission measurement in ruminants.
ISSN:2076-2615