Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran

Background: Despite recent scientific and technological advances in diagnosis and treatment of diseases, more complaints from the therapeutic team and physicians are issued. Increased number of physicians, population growth, enhanced knowledge of people, and complicated diagnostic and treatment inst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khosro Naghibi, Kamran Montazari, Sayed Salman Khalifeh Soltani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Vesnu Publications 2012-03-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1436
id doaj-4d048614e5ca4bdb803edc475e7e8506
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d048614e5ca4bdb803edc475e7e85062020-11-25T00:10:51ZfasVesnu Publications مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-03-012915715421553967Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, IranKhosro Naghibi0Kamran Montazari1Sayed Salman Khalifeh Soltani2Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranGeneral Practitioner, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: Despite recent scientific and technological advances in diagnosis and treatment of diseases, more complaints from the therapeutic team and physicians are issued. Increased number of physicians, population growth, enhanced knowledge of people, and complicated diagnostic and treatment instruments might be responsible for this trend. In addition, fading the traditional physician-patient relationship is magnifying the problem. The present study was hence performed to detect the backgrounds and motives of the complainers as well as demographic features of both plaintiffs and defendants. Methods: This descriptive study used a questionnaire to retrospectively survey all medical complaints issued in Isfahan division of the Iranian medical council during 2007-9. Findings: During 2007-9, 821 complaints from therapeutic teams were issued in the medical council of Isfahan. In 162 cases (19.7%), the therapeutic team was decided to be guilty while in 659 cases, they were exonerated. Among these 821 complaints, 655 (79.8%) were from physicians, 82 (9.9%) from dentists, 9 (1.0%) from pharmacists, 5 (0.6%) from midwives, 3 (0.3%) from nurses, 2 (0.2%) from physiotherapists, and 65 (7.9%) from others. In the survey of the cause of complaint, 288 cases of therapeutic faults, 160 cases of nonchalance, 147 cases of non-adherence to governmental rules, 147 high cost, 85 cases of patient negligence, 47 cases of wrong diagnosis, and 43 cases of inappropriate behavior were found. While some treatment complications such as physical injuries (n = 562; 68.4%), death (n = 162; 19.7%), and mental complications (n = 1; 0.3%) were reported, in 96 cases (11.6%), no complications were recorded. A single lawyer followed 27 cases (3%). Complaints from governmental and private centers constituted 49.1% (n = 403) and 50.9% (n = 418) of all cases, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the abovementioned finding, measures need to be taken to reduce the number of medical complaints. Most importantly however, the motives and causes of complaints should be clearly identified.http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1436Patient complaintMedical faultMedical errorMedical complaint
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khosro Naghibi
Kamran Montazari
Sayed Salman Khalifeh Soltani
spellingShingle Khosro Naghibi
Kamran Montazari
Sayed Salman Khalifeh Soltani
Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Patient complaint
Medical fault
Medical error
Medical complaint
author_facet Khosro Naghibi
Kamran Montazari
Sayed Salman Khalifeh Soltani
author_sort Khosro Naghibi
title Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
title_short Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
title_full Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
title_fullStr Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
title_full_unstemmed Review of Medical Complaint Files in the Medical Council of Isfahan, Iran
title_sort review of medical complaint files in the medical council of isfahan, iran
publisher Vesnu Publications
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Background: Despite recent scientific and technological advances in diagnosis and treatment of diseases, more complaints from the therapeutic team and physicians are issued. Increased number of physicians, population growth, enhanced knowledge of people, and complicated diagnostic and treatment instruments might be responsible for this trend. In addition, fading the traditional physician-patient relationship is magnifying the problem. The present study was hence performed to detect the backgrounds and motives of the complainers as well as demographic features of both plaintiffs and defendants. Methods: This descriptive study used a questionnaire to retrospectively survey all medical complaints issued in Isfahan division of the Iranian medical council during 2007-9. Findings: During 2007-9, 821 complaints from therapeutic teams were issued in the medical council of Isfahan. In 162 cases (19.7%), the therapeutic team was decided to be guilty while in 659 cases, they were exonerated. Among these 821 complaints, 655 (79.8%) were from physicians, 82 (9.9%) from dentists, 9 (1.0%) from pharmacists, 5 (0.6%) from midwives, 3 (0.3%) from nurses, 2 (0.2%) from physiotherapists, and 65 (7.9%) from others. In the survey of the cause of complaint, 288 cases of therapeutic faults, 160 cases of nonchalance, 147 cases of non-adherence to governmental rules, 147 high cost, 85 cases of patient negligence, 47 cases of wrong diagnosis, and 43 cases of inappropriate behavior were found. While some treatment complications such as physical injuries (n = 562; 68.4%), death (n = 162; 19.7%), and mental complications (n = 1; 0.3%) were reported, in 96 cases (11.6%), no complications were recorded. A single lawyer followed 27 cases (3%). Complaints from governmental and private centers constituted 49.1% (n = 403) and 50.9% (n = 418) of all cases, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the abovementioned finding, measures need to be taken to reduce the number of medical complaints. Most importantly however, the motives and causes of complaints should be clearly identified.
topic Patient complaint
Medical fault
Medical error
Medical complaint
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1436
work_keys_str_mv AT khosronaghibi reviewofmedicalcomplaintfilesinthemedicalcouncilofisfahaniran
AT kamranmontazari reviewofmedicalcomplaintfilesinthemedicalcouncilofisfahaniran
AT sayedsalmankhalifehsoltani reviewofmedicalcomplaintfilesinthemedicalcouncilofisfahaniran
_version_ 1725406675154763776