Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Stress-related disorders are widespread and responsible for high societal costs e.g. sick leave payment and reduced productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention program on return to work or labour...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andersen Johan, Tornemand Helle, Friche Claus, Lander Flemming, Kirkeskov Lilli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/372
id doaj-4d2650947200405f83277d456d0c1328
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d2650947200405f83277d456d0c13282020-11-25T00:26:04ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582009-10-019137210.1186/1471-2458-9-372Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?Andersen JohanTornemand HelleFriche ClausLander FlemmingKirkeskov Lilli<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Stress-related disorders are widespread and responsible for high societal costs e.g. sick leave payment and reduced productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention program on return to work or labour market.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In a controlled interventional study design we compared 72 emotionally distressed patients, who received support during 2006, with 89 control individuals who had also been sick listed for emotional distress. Intervention was provided by trained psychologists and social workers who were in continuous dialog with the patients, providing counselling e.g. on decisions concerning resumption of work, support to families, participation in meetings with the workplace. Basically, the controls and the intervention group share the same access to welfare benefits. The main outcome was time to return to labour market (TTR).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. There were no differences in the rate of resuming work between the two groups. About 80% in both groups had returned to the labour market after one year.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An intervention program with psychological stress management and case management did not improve work capability compared to usual care. Work resumption as a single outcome probably is an insensitive parameter of intervention management quality, and should be supplemented by other data on different aspects of treatment.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/372
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andersen Johan
Tornemand Helle
Friche Claus
Lander Flemming
Kirkeskov Lilli
spellingShingle Andersen Johan
Tornemand Helle
Friche Claus
Lander Flemming
Kirkeskov Lilli
Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
BMC Public Health
author_facet Andersen Johan
Tornemand Helle
Friche Claus
Lander Flemming
Kirkeskov Lilli
author_sort Andersen Johan
title Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
title_short Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
title_full Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
title_fullStr Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
title_full_unstemmed Can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
title_sort can we enhance the ability to return to work among workers with stress-related disorders?
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Stress-related disorders are widespread and responsible for high societal costs e.g. sick leave payment and reduced productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention program on return to work or labour market.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In a controlled interventional study design we compared 72 emotionally distressed patients, who received support during 2006, with 89 control individuals who had also been sick listed for emotional distress. Intervention was provided by trained psychologists and social workers who were in continuous dialog with the patients, providing counselling e.g. on decisions concerning resumption of work, support to families, participation in meetings with the workplace. Basically, the controls and the intervention group share the same access to welfare benefits. The main outcome was time to return to labour market (TTR).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. There were no differences in the rate of resuming work between the two groups. About 80% in both groups had returned to the labour market after one year.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An intervention program with psychological stress management and case management did not improve work capability compared to usual care. Work resumption as a single outcome probably is an insensitive parameter of intervention management quality, and should be supplemented by other data on different aspects of treatment.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/372
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenjohan canweenhancetheabilitytoreturntoworkamongworkerswithstressrelateddisorders
AT tornemandhelle canweenhancetheabilitytoreturntoworkamongworkerswithstressrelateddisorders
AT fricheclaus canweenhancetheabilitytoreturntoworkamongworkerswithstressrelateddisorders
AT landerflemming canweenhancetheabilitytoreturntoworkamongworkerswithstressrelateddisorders
AT kirkeskovlilli canweenhancetheabilitytoreturntoworkamongworkerswithstressrelateddisorders
_version_ 1725346133218164736