Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
Background The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: thre...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019-04-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdf |
id |
doaj-4d29aa9af4e1446d94b2f712ede4cd62 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d29aa9af4e1446d94b2f712ede4cd622020-11-25T00:41:04ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-04-017e675310.7717/peerj.6753Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropodsAndrea LienhardSylvia SchäfferBackground The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: three silica gel based spin methods, two cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) based ones (one with an additional silica membrane), a protein precipitation method and a method based on a chelating resin (applying different protocols). The quantity (concentration) and quality (degradation, contamination, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing success) of the extracted DNA as well as the costs, preparation times, user friendliness, and required supplies were compared across these methods. To assess the DNA quantity, two different DNA concentration measurements were applied. Additionally, the effect of varying amounts of starting material (different body sizes), variable lysis temperatures and mixing during DNA extraction was evaluated. Results Although low DNA concentrations were measured for all methods, the results showed that—with the exception of two methods—the PCR success was 100%. However, other parameters show vast differences. The time taken to perform DNA extraction varied from 20 min to 2.5 h (Chelex vs. CTAB) and the costs from 0.02 to 3.46 € (Chelex vs. QIAamp kit) per sample. High quality genomic DNA was only gained from four methods. Results of DNA quantity measurements further indicated that some devices cannot deal with small amounts of DNA and show variant results. Discussion In conclusion, using Chelex (chelating resin) turned out as a rapid, low-cost method which can provide high quality DNA for different kinds of molecular investigations.https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdfDNA extractionAcariDNA quantificationPCRComparison |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Lienhard Sylvia Schäffer |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Lienhard Sylvia Schäffer Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods PeerJ DNA extraction Acari DNA quantification PCR Comparison |
author_facet |
Andrea Lienhard Sylvia Schäffer |
author_sort |
Andrea Lienhard |
title |
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods |
title_short |
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods |
title_full |
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods |
title_fullStr |
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods |
title_sort |
extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality dna is a challenging task in small arthropods |
publisher |
PeerJ Inc. |
series |
PeerJ |
issn |
2167-8359 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Background The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: three silica gel based spin methods, two cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) based ones (one with an additional silica membrane), a protein precipitation method and a method based on a chelating resin (applying different protocols). The quantity (concentration) and quality (degradation, contamination, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing success) of the extracted DNA as well as the costs, preparation times, user friendliness, and required supplies were compared across these methods. To assess the DNA quantity, two different DNA concentration measurements were applied. Additionally, the effect of varying amounts of starting material (different body sizes), variable lysis temperatures and mixing during DNA extraction was evaluated. Results Although low DNA concentrations were measured for all methods, the results showed that—with the exception of two methods—the PCR success was 100%. However, other parameters show vast differences. The time taken to perform DNA extraction varied from 20 min to 2.5 h (Chelex vs. CTAB) and the costs from 0.02 to 3.46 € (Chelex vs. QIAamp kit) per sample. High quality genomic DNA was only gained from four methods. Results of DNA quantity measurements further indicated that some devices cannot deal with small amounts of DNA and show variant results. Discussion In conclusion, using Chelex (chelating resin) turned out as a rapid, low-cost method which can provide high quality DNA for different kinds of molecular investigations. |
topic |
DNA extraction Acari DNA quantification PCR Comparison |
url |
https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrealienhard extractingtheinvisibleobtaininghighqualitydnaisachallengingtaskinsmallarthropods AT sylviaschaffer extractingtheinvisibleobtaininghighqualitydnaisachallengingtaskinsmallarthropods |
_version_ |
1725287344969351168 |