Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods

Background The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Lienhard, Sylvia Schäffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-04-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
PCR
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdf
id doaj-4d29aa9af4e1446d94b2f712ede4cd62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d29aa9af4e1446d94b2f712ede4cd622020-11-25T00:41:04ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-04-017e675310.7717/peerj.6753Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropodsAndrea LienhardSylvia SchäfferBackground The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: three silica gel based spin methods, two cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) based ones (one with an additional silica membrane), a protein precipitation method and a method based on a chelating resin (applying different protocols). The quantity (concentration) and quality (degradation, contamination, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing success) of the extracted DNA as well as the costs, preparation times, user friendliness, and required supplies were compared across these methods. To assess the DNA quantity, two different DNA concentration measurements were applied. Additionally, the effect of varying amounts of starting material (different body sizes), variable lysis temperatures and mixing during DNA extraction was evaluated. Results Although low DNA concentrations were measured for all methods, the results showed that—with the exception of two methods—the PCR success was 100%. However, other parameters show vast differences. The time taken to perform DNA extraction varied from 20 min to 2.5 h (Chelex vs. CTAB) and the costs from 0.02 to 3.46 € (Chelex vs. QIAamp kit) per sample. High quality genomic DNA was only gained from four methods. Results of DNA quantity measurements further indicated that some devices cannot deal with small amounts of DNA and show variant results. Discussion In conclusion, using Chelex (chelating resin) turned out as a rapid, low-cost method which can provide high quality DNA for different kinds of molecular investigations.https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdfDNA extractionAcariDNA quantificationPCRComparison
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Lienhard
Sylvia Schäffer
spellingShingle Andrea Lienhard
Sylvia Schäffer
Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
PeerJ
DNA extraction
Acari
DNA quantification
PCR
Comparison
author_facet Andrea Lienhard
Sylvia Schäffer
author_sort Andrea Lienhard
title Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
title_short Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
title_full Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
title_fullStr Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
title_full_unstemmed Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods
title_sort extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality dna is a challenging task in small arthropods
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Background The application of an appropriate extraction method is a relevant factor for the success of all molecular studies. Methods Seven different DNA extraction methods suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing with very small arthropods were compared by applying nine different protocols: three silica gel based spin methods, two cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) based ones (one with an additional silica membrane), a protein precipitation method and a method based on a chelating resin (applying different protocols). The quantity (concentration) and quality (degradation, contamination, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing success) of the extracted DNA as well as the costs, preparation times, user friendliness, and required supplies were compared across these methods. To assess the DNA quantity, two different DNA concentration measurements were applied. Additionally, the effect of varying amounts of starting material (different body sizes), variable lysis temperatures and mixing during DNA extraction was evaluated. Results Although low DNA concentrations were measured for all methods, the results showed that—with the exception of two methods—the PCR success was 100%. However, other parameters show vast differences. The time taken to perform DNA extraction varied from 20 min to 2.5 h (Chelex vs. CTAB) and the costs from 0.02 to 3.46 € (Chelex vs. QIAamp kit) per sample. High quality genomic DNA was only gained from four methods. Results of DNA quantity measurements further indicated that some devices cannot deal with small amounts of DNA and show variant results. Discussion In conclusion, using Chelex (chelating resin) turned out as a rapid, low-cost method which can provide high quality DNA for different kinds of molecular investigations.
topic DNA extraction
Acari
DNA quantification
PCR
Comparison
url https://peerj.com/articles/6753.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andrealienhard extractingtheinvisibleobtaininghighqualitydnaisachallengingtaskinsmallarthropods
AT sylviaschaffer extractingtheinvisibleobtaininghighqualitydnaisachallengingtaskinsmallarthropods
_version_ 1725287344969351168