Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
There is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either requ...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2018-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/ |
id |
doaj-4d3ac56c1e884e2a8f5994d6f7932782 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d3ac56c1e884e2a8f5994d6f79327822021-03-29T18:40:25ZengIEEEIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine2168-23722018-01-01611110.1109/JTEHM.2018.28759858529255Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface AptitudeSam Darvishi0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6055Alireza Gharabaghi1Michael C. Ridding2Derek Abbott3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-2674Mathias Baumert4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-2167School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaDivision of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyRobinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaThere is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either require complicated equipment or suffer from subjectivity. Thus, a simple and objective BCI performance predictor is desirable. Neurofeedback (NFB) training involves performing a cognitive task (motor imagery) instructed via sensory stimuli and re-adjusted through ongoing real-time feedback. A simple reaction time (SRT) test reflects the time required for a subject to respond to a defined stimulus. Thus, we postulated that individuals with shorter reaction times operate a BCI with rapidly updated feedback better than individuals with longer reaction times. Furthermore, we investigated how changing the feedback update interval (FUI), i.e., modification of the feedback provision frequency, affects the correlation between the SRT and BCI performance. Ten participants attended four NFB sessions with FUIs of 16, 24, 48, and 96 ms in a randomized order. We found that: 1) SRT is correlated with the BCI performance with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms; 2) good and poor performers elicit stronger ERDs and control BCIs more effectively (i.e., produced larger information transfer rates) with 16 and 96 ms FUIs, respectively. Our findings suggest that SRT may be used as a simple and objective surrogate for BCI aptitude with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms. It also implies that the FUI customization according to participants SRT measure may enhance the BCI performance.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/Simple reaction timefeedback update intervalbrain-computer interfacebrain-machine interfaceaptitudeinformation transfer rate |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sam Darvishi Alireza Gharabaghi Michael C. Ridding Derek Abbott Mathias Baumert |
spellingShingle |
Sam Darvishi Alireza Gharabaghi Michael C. Ridding Derek Abbott Mathias Baumert Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine Simple reaction time feedback update interval brain-computer interface brain-machine interface aptitude information transfer rate |
author_facet |
Sam Darvishi Alireza Gharabaghi Michael C. Ridding Derek Abbott Mathias Baumert |
author_sort |
Sam Darvishi |
title |
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude |
title_short |
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude |
title_full |
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude |
title_fullStr |
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude |
title_sort |
reaction time predicts brain–computer interface aptitude |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine |
issn |
2168-2372 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
There is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either require complicated equipment or suffer from subjectivity. Thus, a simple and objective BCI performance predictor is desirable. Neurofeedback (NFB) training involves performing a cognitive task (motor imagery) instructed via sensory stimuli and re-adjusted through ongoing real-time feedback. A simple reaction time (SRT) test reflects the time required for a subject to respond to a defined stimulus. Thus, we postulated that individuals with shorter reaction times operate a BCI with rapidly updated feedback better than individuals with longer reaction times. Furthermore, we investigated how changing the feedback update interval (FUI), i.e., modification of the feedback provision frequency, affects the correlation between the SRT and BCI performance. Ten participants attended four NFB sessions with FUIs of 16, 24, 48, and 96 ms in a randomized order. We found that: 1) SRT is correlated with the BCI performance with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms; 2) good and poor performers elicit stronger ERDs and control BCIs more effectively (i.e., produced larger information transfer rates) with 16 and 96 ms FUIs, respectively. Our findings suggest that SRT may be used as a simple and objective surrogate for BCI aptitude with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms. It also implies that the FUI customization according to participants SRT measure may enhance the BCI performance. |
topic |
Simple reaction time feedback update interval brain-computer interface brain-machine interface aptitude information transfer rate |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT samdarvishi reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude AT alirezagharabaghi reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude AT michaelcridding reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude AT derekabbott reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude AT mathiasbaumert reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude |
_version_ |
1724196584634187776 |