Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude

There is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either requ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sam Darvishi, Alireza Gharabaghi, Michael C. Ridding, Derek Abbott, Mathias Baumert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2018-01-01
Series:IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/
id doaj-4d3ac56c1e884e2a8f5994d6f7932782
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d3ac56c1e884e2a8f5994d6f79327822021-03-29T18:40:25ZengIEEEIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine2168-23722018-01-01611110.1109/JTEHM.2018.28759858529255Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface AptitudeSam Darvishi0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6055Alireza Gharabaghi1Michael C. Ridding2Derek Abbott3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-2674Mathias Baumert4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-2167School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaDivision of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyRobinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA, AustraliaThere is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either require complicated equipment or suffer from subjectivity. Thus, a simple and objective BCI performance predictor is desirable. Neurofeedback (NFB) training involves performing a cognitive task (motor imagery) instructed via sensory stimuli and re-adjusted through ongoing real-time feedback. A simple reaction time (SRT) test reflects the time required for a subject to respond to a defined stimulus. Thus, we postulated that individuals with shorter reaction times operate a BCI with rapidly updated feedback better than individuals with longer reaction times. Furthermore, we investigated how changing the feedback update interval (FUI), i.e., modification of the feedback provision frequency, affects the correlation between the SRT and BCI performance. Ten participants attended four NFB sessions with FUIs of 16, 24, 48, and 96 ms in a randomized order. We found that: 1) SRT is correlated with the BCI performance with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms; 2) good and poor performers elicit stronger ERDs and control BCIs more effectively (i.e., produced larger information transfer rates) with 16 and 96 ms FUIs, respectively. Our findings suggest that SRT may be used as a simple and objective surrogate for BCI aptitude with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms. It also implies that the FUI customization according to participants SRT measure may enhance the BCI performance.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/Simple reaction timefeedback update intervalbrain-computer interfacebrain-machine interfaceaptitudeinformation transfer rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sam Darvishi
Alireza Gharabaghi
Michael C. Ridding
Derek Abbott
Mathias Baumert
spellingShingle Sam Darvishi
Alireza Gharabaghi
Michael C. Ridding
Derek Abbott
Mathias Baumert
Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
Simple reaction time
feedback update interval
brain-computer interface
brain-machine interface
aptitude
information transfer rate
author_facet Sam Darvishi
Alireza Gharabaghi
Michael C. Ridding
Derek Abbott
Mathias Baumert
author_sort Sam Darvishi
title Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
title_short Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
title_full Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
title_fullStr Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
title_full_unstemmed Reaction Time Predicts Brain–Computer Interface Aptitude
title_sort reaction time predicts brain–computer interface aptitude
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
issn 2168-2372
publishDate 2018-01-01
description There is evidence that 15–30% of the general population cannot effectively operate brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). Thus the BCI performance predictors are critically required to pre-screen participants. Current neurophysiological and psychological tests either require complicated equipment or suffer from subjectivity. Thus, a simple and objective BCI performance predictor is desirable. Neurofeedback (NFB) training involves performing a cognitive task (motor imagery) instructed via sensory stimuli and re-adjusted through ongoing real-time feedback. A simple reaction time (SRT) test reflects the time required for a subject to respond to a defined stimulus. Thus, we postulated that individuals with shorter reaction times operate a BCI with rapidly updated feedback better than individuals with longer reaction times. Furthermore, we investigated how changing the feedback update interval (FUI), i.e., modification of the feedback provision frequency, affects the correlation between the SRT and BCI performance. Ten participants attended four NFB sessions with FUIs of 16, 24, 48, and 96 ms in a randomized order. We found that: 1) SRT is correlated with the BCI performance with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms; 2) good and poor performers elicit stronger ERDs and control BCIs more effectively (i.e., produced larger information transfer rates) with 16 and 96 ms FUIs, respectively. Our findings suggest that SRT may be used as a simple and objective surrogate for BCI aptitude with FUIs of 16 and 96 ms. It also implies that the FUI customization according to participants SRT measure may enhance the BCI performance.
topic Simple reaction time
feedback update interval
brain-computer interface
brain-machine interface
aptitude
information transfer rate
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8529255/
work_keys_str_mv AT samdarvishi reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude
AT alirezagharabaghi reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude
AT michaelcridding reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude
AT derekabbott reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude
AT mathiasbaumert reactiontimepredictsbrainx2013computerinterfaceaptitude
_version_ 1724196584634187776