Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable biomarkers in the literature that could be used as flare predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) through April 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noémie Gensous, Aurélie Marti, Thomas Barnetche, Patrick Blanco, Estibaliz Lazaro, Julien Seneschal, Marie-Elise Truchetet, Pierre Duffau, Christophe Richez, on behalf of the FHU ACRONIM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Arthritis Research & Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6
id doaj-4d416ab8b5274b79b13594975bae3478
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d416ab8b5274b79b13594975bae34782020-11-24T21:47:11ZengBMCArthritis Research & Therapy1478-63622017-10-0119111210.1186/s13075-017-1442-6Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature reviewNoémie Gensous0Aurélie Marti1Thomas Barnetche2Patrick Blanco3Estibaliz Lazaro4Julien Seneschal5Marie-Elise Truchetet6Pierre Duffau7Christophe Richez8on behalf of the FHU ACRONIMImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Andre HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology, Pellegrin HospitalImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Andre HospitalImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxImmunoConcept, UMR CNRS 5164, Université de BordeauxAbstract Background The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable biomarkers in the literature that could be used as flare predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) through April 2015 and congress abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism were reviewed from 2010 to 2014. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and analysed selected papers in detail, using a specific questionnaire. Reports addressing the relationships between one or more defined biological test(s) and the occurrence of disease exacerbation were included in the systematic review. Results From all of the databases, 4668 records were retrieved, of which 69 studies or congress abstracts were selected for the systematic review. The performance of seven types of biomarkers performed routinely in clinical practice and nine types of novel biological markers was evaluated. Despite some encouraging results for anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, anti-C1q antibodies, B-lymphocyte stimulator and tumour necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, none of the biomarkers stood out from the others as a potential gold standard for flare prediction. The results were heterogeneous, and a lack of standardized data prevented us from identifying a powerful biomarker. Conclusions No powerful conclusions could be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of standardized data. Efforts should be undertaken to optimize future research on potential SLE biomarkers to develop validated candidates. Thus, we propose a standardized pattern for future studies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6Systemic lupus erythematosusBiomarkerFlareExacerbationSystematic review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Noémie Gensous
Aurélie Marti
Thomas Barnetche
Patrick Blanco
Estibaliz Lazaro
Julien Seneschal
Marie-Elise Truchetet
Pierre Duffau
Christophe Richez
on behalf of the FHU ACRONIM
spellingShingle Noémie Gensous
Aurélie Marti
Thomas Barnetche
Patrick Blanco
Estibaliz Lazaro
Julien Seneschal
Marie-Elise Truchetet
Pierre Duffau
Christophe Richez
on behalf of the FHU ACRONIM
Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Biomarker
Flare
Exacerbation
Systematic review
author_facet Noémie Gensous
Aurélie Marti
Thomas Barnetche
Patrick Blanco
Estibaliz Lazaro
Julien Seneschal
Marie-Elise Truchetet
Pierre Duffau
Christophe Richez
on behalf of the FHU ACRONIM
author_sort Noémie Gensous
title Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
title_short Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
title_full Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
title_sort predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review
publisher BMC
series Arthritis Research & Therapy
issn 1478-6362
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable biomarkers in the literature that could be used as flare predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) through April 2015 and congress abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism were reviewed from 2010 to 2014. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and analysed selected papers in detail, using a specific questionnaire. Reports addressing the relationships between one or more defined biological test(s) and the occurrence of disease exacerbation were included in the systematic review. Results From all of the databases, 4668 records were retrieved, of which 69 studies or congress abstracts were selected for the systematic review. The performance of seven types of biomarkers performed routinely in clinical practice and nine types of novel biological markers was evaluated. Despite some encouraging results for anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, anti-C1q antibodies, B-lymphocyte stimulator and tumour necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, none of the biomarkers stood out from the others as a potential gold standard for flare prediction. The results were heterogeneous, and a lack of standardized data prevented us from identifying a powerful biomarker. Conclusions No powerful conclusions could be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of standardized data. Efforts should be undertaken to optimize future research on potential SLE biomarkers to develop validated candidates. Thus, we propose a standardized pattern for future studies.
topic Systemic lupus erythematosus
Biomarker
Flare
Exacerbation
Systematic review
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6
work_keys_str_mv AT noemiegensous predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT aureliemarti predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT thomasbarnetche predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT patrickblanco predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT estibalizlazaro predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT julienseneschal predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT marieelisetruchetet predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT pierreduffau predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT christopherichez predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
AT onbehalfofthefhuacronim predictivebiologicalmarkersofsystemiclupuserythematosusflaresasystematicliteraturereview
_version_ 1725898906824343552