Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature

Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) are highly effective in improving prostate cancer survival. However, both have a detrimental effect on erectile function (EF). Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that cause erectile dysfunction (ED) and utilizing pharmacolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez, Run Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Andrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=6;spage=916;epage=922;aulast=Clavell-Hernandez
id doaj-4d60c5b098334efba5ce4a6698a8c93d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d60c5b098334efba5ce4a6698a8c93d2020-11-24T21:28:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Journal of Andrology1008-682X1745-72622015-01-0117691692210.4103/1008-682X.150838Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literatureJonathan Clavell-HernandezRun WangRadical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) are highly effective in improving prostate cancer survival. However, both have a detrimental effect on erectile function (EF). Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that cause erectile dysfunction (ED) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function. For the past decade, many researchers have pursued to define effective treatment modalities to improve ED after prostate cancer treatment. Despite the understanding of the mechanisms and well-established rationale for postprostate treatment penile rehabilitation, there is still no consensus regarding effective rehabilitation programs. This article reviews a contemporary series of trials that assess penile rehabilitation and explore treatment modalities that might play a role in the future. Published data and trials related to penile rehabilitation after RP and RT were reviewed and presented. Although recent trials have shown that most therapies are well-tolerated and aid in some degree on EF recovery, we currently do not have tangible evidence to recommend an irrefutable penile rehabilitation algorithm. However, advancements in research and technology will ultimately create and refine management options for penile rehabilitation.http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=6;spage=916;epage=922;aulast=Clavell-Hernandezerectile dysfunction; penile rehabilitation; technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez
Run Wang
spellingShingle Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez
Run Wang
Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
Asian Journal of Andrology
erectile dysfunction; penile rehabilitation; technology
author_facet Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez
Run Wang
author_sort Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez
title Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
title_short Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
title_full Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
title_fullStr Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
title_full_unstemmed Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
title_sort penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Asian Journal of Andrology
issn 1008-682X
1745-7262
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) are highly effective in improving prostate cancer survival. However, both have a detrimental effect on erectile function (EF). Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that cause erectile dysfunction (ED) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function. For the past decade, many researchers have pursued to define effective treatment modalities to improve ED after prostate cancer treatment. Despite the understanding of the mechanisms and well-established rationale for postprostate treatment penile rehabilitation, there is still no consensus regarding effective rehabilitation programs. This article reviews a contemporary series of trials that assess penile rehabilitation and explore treatment modalities that might play a role in the future. Published data and trials related to penile rehabilitation after RP and RT were reviewed and presented. Although recent trials have shown that most therapies are well-tolerated and aid in some degree on EF recovery, we currently do not have tangible evidence to recommend an irrefutable penile rehabilitation algorithm. However, advancements in research and technology will ultimately create and refine management options for penile rehabilitation.
topic erectile dysfunction; penile rehabilitation; technology
url http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=6;spage=916;epage=922;aulast=Clavell-Hernandez
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanclavellhernandez penilerehabilitationfollowingprostatecancertreatmentreviewofcurrentliterature
AT runwang penilerehabilitationfollowingprostatecancertreatmentreviewofcurrentliterature
_version_ 1725971362195963904