Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

Introduction: The standard surgical procedures for patients with early-stage NSCLC is lobectomy-associated radical lymphadenectomy performed by using the thoracotomy approach. In the last few years, minimally invasive techniques have increasingly strengthened their role in lung cancer treatment, esp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Enrico Melis, Daniele Forcella, Edoardo Mercadante, Daniele Marinelli, Serena Ceddia, Federico Cappuzzo, Sabrina Vari, Fabiana Letizia Cecere, Mauro Caterino, Antonello Vidiri, Paolo Visca, Simonetta Buglioni, Isabella Sperduti, Mirella Marino, Francesco Facciolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.666158/full
id doaj-4d6d3180133140839c7b8eb85e72cd06
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filippo Tommaso Gallina
Enrico Melis
Daniele Forcella
Edoardo Mercadante
Daniele Marinelli
Serena Ceddia
Federico Cappuzzo
Sabrina Vari
Fabiana Letizia Cecere
Mauro Caterino
Antonello Vidiri
Paolo Visca
Simonetta Buglioni
Isabella Sperduti
Mirella Marino
Francesco Facciolo
spellingShingle Filippo Tommaso Gallina
Enrico Melis
Daniele Forcella
Edoardo Mercadante
Daniele Marinelli
Serena Ceddia
Federico Cappuzzo
Sabrina Vari
Fabiana Letizia Cecere
Mauro Caterino
Antonello Vidiri
Paolo Visca
Simonetta Buglioni
Isabella Sperduti
Mirella Marino
Francesco Facciolo
Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
Frontiers in Surgery
NSCLC
robotic thoracic surgery (RATS)
mediastinal lymphadenectomy
VATS
thoracic oncology
author_facet Filippo Tommaso Gallina
Enrico Melis
Daniele Forcella
Edoardo Mercadante
Daniele Marinelli
Serena Ceddia
Federico Cappuzzo
Sabrina Vari
Fabiana Letizia Cecere
Mauro Caterino
Antonello Vidiri
Paolo Visca
Simonetta Buglioni
Isabella Sperduti
Mirella Marino
Francesco Facciolo
author_sort Filippo Tommaso Gallina
title Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_short Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_full Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_fullStr Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_sort nodal upstaging evaluation after robotic-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy: a retrospective single center analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Surgery
issn 2296-875X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Introduction: The standard surgical procedures for patients with early-stage NSCLC is lobectomy-associated radical lymphadenectomy performed by using the thoracotomy approach. In the last few years, minimally invasive techniques have increasingly strengthened their role in lung cancer treatment, especially in the early stage of the disease. Although the lobectomy technique has been accepted, controversy still surrounds lymph node dissection. In our study, we analyze the rate of upstaging early non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent radical surgical treatment using the robotic and the VATS techniques compared to the standard thoracotomy approach.Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy at our Institute between 2010 and 2019. We selected 505 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study: 237 patients underwent robotic surgery, 158 patients had thoracotomy, and 110 patients were treated with VATS. We analyzed the demographic features between the groups as well as the nodal upstaging rate after pathological examination, the number of dissected lymph nodes and the ratio of dissected lymph nodes to metastatic lymph nodes of the three groups.Results: The patients of the three groups were homogenous with respect to age, sex, and histology. The postoperative major morbidity rate was significantly higher in the thoracotomy group, and hospital stay was significantly longer. The percentage of the mediastinal nodal upstaging rate and the number of dissected lymph nodes was significantly higher in the robotic group compared with the VATS group. The ratio of dissected lymph nodes to metastatic lymph nodes was significantly lower compared with the VATS group and the thoracotomy group.Discussion: The prognostic impact of the R(un) status is still highly debated. A surgical approach that allows better results in terms of resection has still not been defined. Our results show that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach especially regarding the accuracy of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. These findings can lead to defining a more precise pathological stage of the disease and, if necessary, to more accurate postoperative treatment.
topic NSCLC
robotic thoracic surgery (RATS)
mediastinal lymphadenectomy
VATS
thoracic oncology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.666158/full
work_keys_str_mv AT filippotommasogallina nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT enricomelis nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT danieleforcella nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT edoardomercadante nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT danielemarinelli nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT serenaceddia nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT federicocappuzzo nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT sabrinavari nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT fabianaletiziacecere nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT maurocaterino nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT antonellovidiri nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT paolovisca nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT simonettabuglioni nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT isabellasperduti nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT mirellamarino nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT francescofacciolo nodalupstagingevaluationafterroboticassistedlobectomyforearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancercomparedtovideoassistedthoracicsurgeryandthoracotomyaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
_version_ 1721347493946458112
spelling doaj-4d6d3180133140839c7b8eb85e72cd062021-07-01T04:27:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-07-01810.3389/fsurg.2021.666158666158Nodal Upstaging Evaluation After Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Thoracotomy: A Retrospective Single Center AnalysisFilippo Tommaso Gallina0Enrico Melis1Daniele Forcella2Edoardo Mercadante3Daniele Marinelli4Serena Ceddia5Federico Cappuzzo6Sabrina Vari7Fabiana Letizia Cecere8Mauro Caterino9Antonello Vidiri10Paolo Visca11Simonetta Buglioni12Isabella Sperduti13Mirella Marino14Francesco Facciolo15Thoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyRadiology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyRadiology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Biostatistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, ItalyIntroduction: The standard surgical procedures for patients with early-stage NSCLC is lobectomy-associated radical lymphadenectomy performed by using the thoracotomy approach. In the last few years, minimally invasive techniques have increasingly strengthened their role in lung cancer treatment, especially in the early stage of the disease. Although the lobectomy technique has been accepted, controversy still surrounds lymph node dissection. In our study, we analyze the rate of upstaging early non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent radical surgical treatment using the robotic and the VATS techniques compared to the standard thoracotomy approach.Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy at our Institute between 2010 and 2019. We selected 505 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study: 237 patients underwent robotic surgery, 158 patients had thoracotomy, and 110 patients were treated with VATS. We analyzed the demographic features between the groups as well as the nodal upstaging rate after pathological examination, the number of dissected lymph nodes and the ratio of dissected lymph nodes to metastatic lymph nodes of the three groups.Results: The patients of the three groups were homogenous with respect to age, sex, and histology. The postoperative major morbidity rate was significantly higher in the thoracotomy group, and hospital stay was significantly longer. The percentage of the mediastinal nodal upstaging rate and the number of dissected lymph nodes was significantly higher in the robotic group compared with the VATS group. The ratio of dissected lymph nodes to metastatic lymph nodes was significantly lower compared with the VATS group and the thoracotomy group.Discussion: The prognostic impact of the R(un) status is still highly debated. A surgical approach that allows better results in terms of resection has still not been defined. Our results show that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach especially regarding the accuracy of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. These findings can lead to defining a more precise pathological stage of the disease and, if necessary, to more accurate postoperative treatment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.666158/fullNSCLCrobotic thoracic surgery (RATS)mediastinal lymphadenectomyVATSthoracic oncology