Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam.
Out-of-pocket payments (OOPs), direct payments by households or individuals for healthcare are part of the health financing landscape. Data on OOPs is needed to monitor progress in financial risk protection, and the evaluation of health financing policies. In low-and-middle-income countries, estimat...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242734 |
id |
doaj-4d80982d9628448cbe4e386fbdb04f29 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d80982d9628448cbe4e386fbdb04f292021-03-04T12:42:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024273410.1371/journal.pone.0242734Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam.Lan My LeGabriela FloresTessa Tan-Torres EdejerToan Khanh TranChuc Thi Kim NguyenDo Thanh TranPhuc Dang HoIsaiah Awintuen AgorinyaFabrizio TediosiAmanda RossOut-of-pocket payments (OOPs), direct payments by households or individuals for healthcare are part of the health financing landscape. Data on OOPs is needed to monitor progress in financial risk protection, and the evaluation of health financing policies. In low-and-middle-income countries, estimates of OOPs rely heavily on self-reported data from household surveys. These surveys require respondents to recall events in the past and can suffer from recall biases. This study investigates the effect of recall period on the agreement of the amount and timing of inpatient OOPs between household reports and provider records in Bavi, Vietnam. We recruited 1397 households for interview using records from the district hospital. The households were interviewed with identical questionnaires except that the recall period was either 12 or 6 months. We linked household with provider data and excluded medicine costs from both household and provider OOPs since they could be purchased outside the hospital. We estimated the effect of recall period on the overall mean and variability of ratios of household to hospital reported OOPs using the Bland-Altman approach for method comparison. We estimated the effect of recall period on whether a transaction was recalled correctly in expenditure and time using multinomial regression. The households reported higher amounts of OOPs than did the hospital for both recall periods. There was no evidence of an effect of recall period on the mean of the ratios of household- to hospital-reported OOPs, although the confidence intervals are not inconsistent with previous studies indicating higher OOPs for shorter recall periods. The geometric mean ratio for the 6-month period was estimated to be a multiple of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9, 2.1) times that of the 12-month period. Similarly, there was no evidence of an effect of recall period on the risk of reporting lower or higher amounts than provider OOPs. The occurrence and timing of inpatient stays generally recalled well, with 70% remembered in the correct month declining slightly over time. Respondents for the 6-month recall period had a significantly lower risk of failing to report the event (RR 0.8 (0.7, 1.0)). The results suggest the best recall period may depend on whether the purpose of a survey is for the recall of the timing of events, in which case the 6 month period may be better, or the amounts of OOPs, where there was no significant difference and the provider records are not a gold standard but the 12 month period had a tendency to be in closer agreement with the provider OOPs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242734 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lan My Le Gabriela Flores Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Toan Khanh Tran Chuc Thi Kim Nguyen Do Thanh Tran Phuc Dang Ho Isaiah Awintuen Agorinya Fabrizio Tediosi Amanda Ross |
spellingShingle |
Lan My Le Gabriela Flores Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Toan Khanh Tran Chuc Thi Kim Nguyen Do Thanh Tran Phuc Dang Ho Isaiah Awintuen Agorinya Fabrizio Tediosi Amanda Ross Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Lan My Le Gabriela Flores Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Toan Khanh Tran Chuc Thi Kim Nguyen Do Thanh Tran Phuc Dang Ho Isaiah Awintuen Agorinya Fabrizio Tediosi Amanda Ross |
author_sort |
Lan My Le |
title |
Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. |
title_short |
Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. |
title_full |
Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. |
title_fullStr |
Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam. |
title_sort |
investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in vietnam. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Out-of-pocket payments (OOPs), direct payments by households or individuals for healthcare are part of the health financing landscape. Data on OOPs is needed to monitor progress in financial risk protection, and the evaluation of health financing policies. In low-and-middle-income countries, estimates of OOPs rely heavily on self-reported data from household surveys. These surveys require respondents to recall events in the past and can suffer from recall biases. This study investigates the effect of recall period on the agreement of the amount and timing of inpatient OOPs between household reports and provider records in Bavi, Vietnam. We recruited 1397 households for interview using records from the district hospital. The households were interviewed with identical questionnaires except that the recall period was either 12 or 6 months. We linked household with provider data and excluded medicine costs from both household and provider OOPs since they could be purchased outside the hospital. We estimated the effect of recall period on the overall mean and variability of ratios of household to hospital reported OOPs using the Bland-Altman approach for method comparison. We estimated the effect of recall period on whether a transaction was recalled correctly in expenditure and time using multinomial regression. The households reported higher amounts of OOPs than did the hospital for both recall periods. There was no evidence of an effect of recall period on the mean of the ratios of household- to hospital-reported OOPs, although the confidence intervals are not inconsistent with previous studies indicating higher OOPs for shorter recall periods. The geometric mean ratio for the 6-month period was estimated to be a multiple of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9, 2.1) times that of the 12-month period. Similarly, there was no evidence of an effect of recall period on the risk of reporting lower or higher amounts than provider OOPs. The occurrence and timing of inpatient stays generally recalled well, with 70% remembered in the correct month declining slightly over time. Respondents for the 6-month recall period had a significantly lower risk of failing to report the event (RR 0.8 (0.7, 1.0)). The results suggest the best recall period may depend on whether the purpose of a survey is for the recall of the timing of events, in which case the 6 month period may be better, or the amounts of OOPs, where there was no significant difference and the provider records are not a gold standard but the 12 month period had a tendency to be in closer agreement with the provider OOPs. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242734 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lanmyle investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT gabrielaflores investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT tessatantorresedejer investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT toankhanhtran investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT chucthikimnguyen investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT dothanhtran investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT phucdangho investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT isaiahawintuenagorinya investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT fabriziotediosi investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam AT amandaross investigatingtheeffectofrecallperiodonestimatesofinpatientoutofpocketexpenditurefromhouseholdsurveysinvietnam |
_version_ |
1714801888924270592 |