Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine

Background: Impairment of pulmonary aeration is a frequent postoperative complication that is associated with adverse outcome. Diagnosis and quantification of impaired pulmonary aeration by CT scan is limited due to concern for exposure to ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Noll, Mickael Ohana, Maryse Hengen, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Michele Diana, Celine Giraudeau, Julien Pottecher, Nicolas Meyer, Pierre Diemunsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00695/full
id doaj-4d83880b47f6480c85f7b83dcc45aa8f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Mickael Ohana
Maryse Hengen
Maryse Hengen
Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
Michele Diana
Celine Giraudeau
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Nicolas Meyer
Nicolas Meyer
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
spellingShingle Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Mickael Ohana
Maryse Hengen
Maryse Hengen
Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
Michele Diana
Celine Giraudeau
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Nicolas Meyer
Nicolas Meyer
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
Frontiers in Physiology
lung imaging
perioperative medicine
postoperative pulmonary complications
lung physiopathology
alveolar recruitment
author_facet Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Eric Noll
Mickael Ohana
Maryse Hengen
Maryse Hengen
Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
Michele Diana
Celine Giraudeau
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Julien Pottecher
Nicolas Meyer
Nicolas Meyer
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
Pierre Diemunsch
author_sort Eric Noll
title Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
title_short Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
title_full Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
title_fullStr Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
title_full_unstemmed Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in Swine
title_sort validation of mri for volumetric quantification of atelectasis in the perioperative period: an experimental study in swine
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background: Impairment of pulmonary aeration is a frequent postoperative complication that is associated with adverse outcome. Diagnosis and quantification of impaired pulmonary aeration by CT scan is limited due to concern for exposure to ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a potential radiation-free alternative for this use. We undertook an experimental study to validate the use of MRI to quantify pulmonary aeration impairment.Methods: Ten large white pigs were studied before intubation, after intubation, 2 h after non-protective mechanical ventilation and after intra-tracheal negative pressure suction to induce atelectasis. A lung CT scan immediately followed by a lung MRI were performed at all four time points. On the 40 CT images lung volumes corresponding to non-aerated, poorly aerated, normally aerated, and overinflated voxels were measured based on their radiodensity. Similarly, on the 40 MRI images lung volumes corresponding to non-aerated and aerated voxels were measured based on their signal intensity. The correlation between non-aerated lung by MRI vs., CT scans, and with PaO2/FiO2 measured at each of the four time points was assessed with the Pearson’ correlation coefficient, bias and limits of agreement.Results: Pearson correlation coefficient, bias and limits of agreements between the CT non-aerated lung volumes and MRI abnormal lung volumes were 0.88, -16 ml, and (-108, 77), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient between PaO2/FiO2 and abnormal lung volumes measured with MRI was -0.60.Conclusion: In a preclinical swine model, quantitative measurements of pulmonary atelectasis by MRI-imaging are well correlated with the gold standard, i.e., densitometric scan CT measurements.
topic lung imaging
perioperative medicine
postoperative pulmonary complications
lung physiopathology
alveolar recruitment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00695/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ericnoll validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT ericnoll validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT ericnoll validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT mickaelohana validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT marysehengen validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT marysehengen validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT elliottbennettguerrero validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT michelediana validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT celinegiraudeau validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT julienpottecher validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT julienpottecher validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT julienpottecher validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT nicolasmeyer validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT nicolasmeyer validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT pierrediemunsch validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT pierrediemunsch validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
AT pierrediemunsch validationofmriforvolumetricquantificationofatelectasisintheperioperativeperiodanexperimentalstudyinswine
_version_ 1725864246428827648
spelling doaj-4d83880b47f6480c85f7b83dcc45aa8f2020-11-24T21:55:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-06-011010.3389/fphys.2019.00695447048Validation of MRI for Volumetric Quantification of Atelectasis in the Perioperative Period: An Experimental Study in SwineEric Noll0Eric Noll1Eric Noll2Mickael Ohana3Maryse Hengen4Maryse Hengen5Elliott Bennett-Guerrero6Michele Diana7Celine Giraudeau8Julien Pottecher9Julien Pottecher10Julien Pottecher11Nicolas Meyer12Nicolas Meyer13Pierre Diemunsch14Pierre Diemunsch15Pierre Diemunsch16Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceFédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Faculté de Médecine, Institut de Physiologie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Radiology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, United StatesInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceFédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Faculté de Médecine, Institut de Physiologie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Public Health, Groupe Methodes en Recherche Clinique (GMRC), Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceiCube, UMR7357, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire “Image-Guided Surgery”, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceFédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Faculté de Médecine, Institut de Physiologie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceBackground: Impairment of pulmonary aeration is a frequent postoperative complication that is associated with adverse outcome. Diagnosis and quantification of impaired pulmonary aeration by CT scan is limited due to concern for exposure to ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a potential radiation-free alternative for this use. We undertook an experimental study to validate the use of MRI to quantify pulmonary aeration impairment.Methods: Ten large white pigs were studied before intubation, after intubation, 2 h after non-protective mechanical ventilation and after intra-tracheal negative pressure suction to induce atelectasis. A lung CT scan immediately followed by a lung MRI were performed at all four time points. On the 40 CT images lung volumes corresponding to non-aerated, poorly aerated, normally aerated, and overinflated voxels were measured based on their radiodensity. Similarly, on the 40 MRI images lung volumes corresponding to non-aerated and aerated voxels were measured based on their signal intensity. The correlation between non-aerated lung by MRI vs., CT scans, and with PaO2/FiO2 measured at each of the four time points was assessed with the Pearson’ correlation coefficient, bias and limits of agreement.Results: Pearson correlation coefficient, bias and limits of agreements between the CT non-aerated lung volumes and MRI abnormal lung volumes were 0.88, -16 ml, and (-108, 77), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient between PaO2/FiO2 and abnormal lung volumes measured with MRI was -0.60.Conclusion: In a preclinical swine model, quantitative measurements of pulmonary atelectasis by MRI-imaging are well correlated with the gold standard, i.e., densitometric scan CT measurements.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.00695/fulllung imagingperioperative medicinepostoperative pulmonary complicationslung physiopathologyalveolar recruitment