Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork

ABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality clas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henrique Pereira Cazedey, Robledo de Almeida Torres Filho, Paulo Rogério Fontes, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos, Eduardo Mendes Ramos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Series:Ciência Rural
Subjects:
PSE
pH
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-4da73ce71e124dc1b030793223d18c69
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4da73ce71e124dc1b030793223d18c692020-11-24T23:15:05ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCiência Rural1678-459646122241224810.1590/0103-8478cr20160013S0103-84782016001202241Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of porkHenrique Pereira CazedeyRobledo de Almeida Torres FilhoPaulo Rogério FontesAlcinéia de Lemos Souza RamosEduardo Mendes RamosABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241&lng=en&tlng=enPSEDFD meatcolorexudationpH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henrique Pereira Cazedey
Robledo de Almeida Torres Filho
Paulo Rogério Fontes
Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos
Eduardo Mendes Ramos
spellingShingle Henrique Pereira Cazedey
Robledo de Almeida Torres Filho
Paulo Rogério Fontes
Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos
Eduardo Mendes Ramos
Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
Ciência Rural
PSE
DFD meat
color
exudation
pH
author_facet Henrique Pereira Cazedey
Robledo de Almeida Torres Filho
Paulo Rogério Fontes
Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos
Eduardo Mendes Ramos
author_sort Henrique Pereira Cazedey
title Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_short Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_fullStr Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_sort comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
series Ciência Rural
issn 1678-4596
description ABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.
topic PSE
DFD meat
color
exudation
pH
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT henriquepereiracazedey comparisonofdifferentcriteriausedtocategorizetechnologicalqualityofpork
AT robledodealmeidatorresfilho comparisonofdifferentcriteriausedtocategorizetechnologicalqualityofpork
AT paulorogeriofontes comparisonofdifferentcriteriausedtocategorizetechnologicalqualityofpork
AT alcineiadelemossouzaramos comparisonofdifferentcriteriausedtocategorizetechnologicalqualityofpork
AT eduardomendesramos comparisonofdifferentcriteriausedtocategorizetechnologicalqualityofpork
_version_ 1725592260647583744