Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting

The capture of covert spatial attention by salient visual events influences subsequent gaze behavior. A task irrelevant stimulus (cue) can reduce (Attention capture) or prolong (Inhi-bition of return) saccade reaction time to a subsequent target stimulus depending on the cue-target delay. Here we in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valerie Higenell, Brian J. White, Joshua R. Hwang, Douglas P. Munoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Eye Movement Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2349
id doaj-4dbb8afa06aa437ea786a9c512bdc53d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4dbb8afa06aa437ea786a9c512bdc53d2021-05-28T13:34:27ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922012-12-016110.16910/jemr.6.1.1Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert OrientingValerie Higenell0Brian J. White1Joshua R. Hwang2Douglas P. Munoz3Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill UniversityCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s UniversityUniversity of Western OntarioCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s UniversityThe capture of covert spatial attention by salient visual events influences subsequent gaze behavior. A task irrelevant stimulus (cue) can reduce (Attention capture) or prolong (Inhi-bition of return) saccade reaction time to a subsequent target stimulus depending on the cue-target delay. Here we investigated the mechanisms that underlie the sensory-based account of AC/IOR by manipulating the visual processing stage where the cue and target interact. In Experiment 1, liquid crystal shutter goggles were used to test whether AC/IOR occur at a monocular versus binocular processing stage (before versus after signals from both eyes converge). In Experiment 2, we tested whether visual orientation selective mechanisms are critical for AC/IOR by using oriented “Gabor” stimuli. We found that the magnitude of AC and IOR was not different between monocular and interocular viewing conditions, or between iso- and ortho-oriented cue-target interactions. The results suggest that the visual mechanisms that contribute to AC/IOR arise at an orientation-independent binocular processing stage.https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2349saccademonocularattentionorientation tuningprimary visual cortex
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valerie Higenell
Brian J. White
Joshua R. Hwang
Douglas P. Munoz
spellingShingle Valerie Higenell
Brian J. White
Joshua R. Hwang
Douglas P. Munoz
Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
Journal of Eye Movement Research
saccade
monocular
attention
orientation tuning
primary visual cortex
author_facet Valerie Higenell
Brian J. White
Joshua R. Hwang
Douglas P. Munoz
author_sort Valerie Higenell
title Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
title_short Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
title_full Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
title_fullStr Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
title_full_unstemmed Localizing the Neural Substrate of Reflexive Covert Orienting
title_sort localizing the neural substrate of reflexive covert orienting
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Journal of Eye Movement Research
issn 1995-8692
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The capture of covert spatial attention by salient visual events influences subsequent gaze behavior. A task irrelevant stimulus (cue) can reduce (Attention capture) or prolong (Inhi-bition of return) saccade reaction time to a subsequent target stimulus depending on the cue-target delay. Here we investigated the mechanisms that underlie the sensory-based account of AC/IOR by manipulating the visual processing stage where the cue and target interact. In Experiment 1, liquid crystal shutter goggles were used to test whether AC/IOR occur at a monocular versus binocular processing stage (before versus after signals from both eyes converge). In Experiment 2, we tested whether visual orientation selective mechanisms are critical for AC/IOR by using oriented “Gabor” stimuli. We found that the magnitude of AC and IOR was not different between monocular and interocular viewing conditions, or between iso- and ortho-oriented cue-target interactions. The results suggest that the visual mechanisms that contribute to AC/IOR arise at an orientation-independent binocular processing stage.
topic saccade
monocular
attention
orientation tuning
primary visual cortex
url https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2349
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriehigenell localizingtheneuralsubstrateofreflexivecovertorienting
AT brianjwhite localizingtheneuralsubstrateofreflexivecovertorienting
AT joshuarhwang localizingtheneuralsubstrateofreflexivecovertorienting
AT douglaspmunoz localizingtheneuralsubstrateofreflexivecovertorienting
_version_ 1721423672357421056