Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed

Land degradation on the upstream of watershed will affect hydrology condition in a way that it will disrupt the sustainability of its existing micro hydro. The purpose of this study is to evaluate micro hydro power plant in central Java toward sustainability against hydrology condition of watershed....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sriyana Ignatius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187301017
id doaj-4e14bda144a0489bb48d00b24654a8d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e14bda144a0489bb48d00b24654a8d22021-02-02T03:27:46ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01730101710.1051/e3sconf/20187301017e3sconf_icenis18_01017Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of WatershedSriyana Ignatius0Civil Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro UniversityLand degradation on the upstream of watershed will affect hydrology condition in a way that it will disrupt the sustainability of its existing micro hydro. The purpose of this study is to evaluate micro hydro power plant in central Java toward sustainability against hydrology condition of watershed. This study is using River Regime Coefficient (RRC) approach where hydrology of watershed with coefficient value less than 50 is classified as non-critical, between 50 and 120 is moderate and more than 120 is critical. Result of the study that was done on 33 micro hydro power plants scattered on 9 watersheds is showing that there are 2 power plants on 2 watersheds have hydrology condition in non-critical status (9.09%), 1 power plant on 1 watershed is in between critical and non-critical status (3.03%), 21 power plants on 3 watersheds are in between critical and moderate status (63.64%), 8 power plants on 6 watersheds are in critical status (21.21%) and 1 power plant on 1 watershed is in between moderate and critical status (3.03%).https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187301017Evaluationmicro hydro power plantwatershed water systemcontinuity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sriyana Ignatius
spellingShingle Sriyana Ignatius
Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
E3S Web of Conferences
Evaluation
micro hydro power plant
watershed water system
continuity
author_facet Sriyana Ignatius
author_sort Sriyana Ignatius
title Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
title_short Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
title_full Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
title_fullStr Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Micro Hydro Power Plants in Central Java toward Sustainability against Hydrology Condition of Watershed
title_sort evaluation of micro hydro power plants in central java toward sustainability against hydrology condition of watershed
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Land degradation on the upstream of watershed will affect hydrology condition in a way that it will disrupt the sustainability of its existing micro hydro. The purpose of this study is to evaluate micro hydro power plant in central Java toward sustainability against hydrology condition of watershed. This study is using River Regime Coefficient (RRC) approach where hydrology of watershed with coefficient value less than 50 is classified as non-critical, between 50 and 120 is moderate and more than 120 is critical. Result of the study that was done on 33 micro hydro power plants scattered on 9 watersheds is showing that there are 2 power plants on 2 watersheds have hydrology condition in non-critical status (9.09%), 1 power plant on 1 watershed is in between critical and non-critical status (3.03%), 21 power plants on 3 watersheds are in between critical and moderate status (63.64%), 8 power plants on 6 watersheds are in critical status (21.21%) and 1 power plant on 1 watershed is in between moderate and critical status (3.03%).
topic Evaluation
micro hydro power plant
watershed water system
continuity
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187301017
work_keys_str_mv AT sriyanaignatius evaluationofmicrohydropowerplantsincentraljavatowardsustainabilityagainsthydrologyconditionofwatershed
_version_ 1724307679163187200