Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The main hypothesis of this study is that neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (GDP) peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid better preserves residual renal function in PD patients over time compared with conventional dialysate.</p&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clarke Margaret, Johnson David W, Wilson Vanessa, Woods Feidhlim, Brown Fiona G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-09-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/11/25
id doaj-4e1c3ea41c0142a3aa1f666812553c24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e1c3ea41c0142a3aa1f666812553c242020-11-24T23:17:50ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692010-09-011112510.1186/1471-2369-11-25Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal functionClarke MargaretJohnson David WWilson VanessaWoods FeidhlimBrown Fiona G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The main hypothesis of this study is that neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (GDP) peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid better preserves residual renal function in PD patients over time compared with conventional dialysate.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Inclusion criteria are adult PD patients (CAPD or APD) aged 18-81 years whose first dialysis was within 90 days prior to or following enrolment and who have a residual GFR ≥ 5 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, a urine output ≥ 400 ml/day and an ability to understand the nature and requirements of this trial. Pregnant or lactating patients or individuals with an active infection at the time of enrolment, a contra-indication to PD or participation in any other clinical trial where an intervention is designed to moderate rate of change of residual renal function are excluded. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either neutral pH, low GDP dialysis solution (Balance<sup>®</sup>) or conventional dialysis solution (Stay.safe<sup>®</sup>) for a period of 2 years. During this 2 year study period, urinary urea and clearance measurements will be performed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome measure will be the slope of residual renal function decline, adjusted for centre and presence of diabetic nephropathy. Secondary outcome measures will include time from initiation of peritoneal dialysis to anuria, peritoneal small solute clearance, peritoneal transport status, peritoneal ultrafiltration, technique survival, patient survival, peritonitis rates and adverse events. A total of 185 patients has been recruited into the trial.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This investigator-initiated study has been designed to provide evidence to help nephrologists determine the optimal dialysis solution for preserving residual renal function in PD patients.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12606000044527</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/11/25
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clarke Margaret
Johnson David W
Wilson Vanessa
Woods Feidhlim
Brown Fiona G
spellingShingle Clarke Margaret
Johnson David W
Wilson Vanessa
Woods Feidhlim
Brown Fiona G
Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
BMC Nephrology
author_facet Clarke Margaret
Johnson David W
Wilson Vanessa
Woods Feidhlim
Brown Fiona G
author_sort Clarke Margaret
title Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
title_short Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
title_full Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the balANZ trial: A randomised controlled trial of low GDP, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
title_sort rationale and design of the balanz trial: a randomised controlled trial of low gdp, neutral ph versus standard peritoneal dialysis solution for the preservation of residual renal function
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2010-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The main hypothesis of this study is that neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (GDP) peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid better preserves residual renal function in PD patients over time compared with conventional dialysate.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Inclusion criteria are adult PD patients (CAPD or APD) aged 18-81 years whose first dialysis was within 90 days prior to or following enrolment and who have a residual GFR ≥ 5 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, a urine output ≥ 400 ml/day and an ability to understand the nature and requirements of this trial. Pregnant or lactating patients or individuals with an active infection at the time of enrolment, a contra-indication to PD or participation in any other clinical trial where an intervention is designed to moderate rate of change of residual renal function are excluded. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either neutral pH, low GDP dialysis solution (Balance<sup>®</sup>) or conventional dialysis solution (Stay.safe<sup>®</sup>) for a period of 2 years. During this 2 year study period, urinary urea and clearance measurements will be performed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome measure will be the slope of residual renal function decline, adjusted for centre and presence of diabetic nephropathy. Secondary outcome measures will include time from initiation of peritoneal dialysis to anuria, peritoneal small solute clearance, peritoneal transport status, peritoneal ultrafiltration, technique survival, patient survival, peritonitis rates and adverse events. A total of 185 patients has been recruited into the trial.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This investigator-initiated study has been designed to provide evidence to help nephrologists determine the optimal dialysis solution for preserving residual renal function in PD patients.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12606000044527</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/11/25
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkemargaret rationaleanddesignofthebalanztrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflowgdpneutralphversusstandardperitonealdialysissolutionforthepreservationofresidualrenalfunction
AT johnsondavidw rationaleanddesignofthebalanztrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflowgdpneutralphversusstandardperitonealdialysissolutionforthepreservationofresidualrenalfunction
AT wilsonvanessa rationaleanddesignofthebalanztrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflowgdpneutralphversusstandardperitonealdialysissolutionforthepreservationofresidualrenalfunction
AT woodsfeidhlim rationaleanddesignofthebalanztrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflowgdpneutralphversusstandardperitonealdialysissolutionforthepreservationofresidualrenalfunction
AT brownfionag rationaleanddesignofthebalanztrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflowgdpneutralphversusstandardperitonealdialysissolutionforthepreservationofresidualrenalfunction
_version_ 1725583066391379968