A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Background Infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) is one of the main causes of serious complications and death in preterm infants. Both Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) are known as the most common treatment strategie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei, Behnaz Basiri, Maryam Shokouhi, Maryam Naser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2018-10-01
Series:International Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/article_10776_073023203a9de5c3d06bb5b36587106e.pdf
id doaj-4e269b61627f44388236ff23dce86a36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e269b61627f44388236ff23dce86a362020-11-25T01:02:50ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Pediatrics2345-50472345-50552018-10-016108339834610.22038/ijp.2018.31577.279510776A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway PressureMohammad Kazem Sabzehei0Behnaz Basiri1Maryam Shokouhi2Maryam Naser3Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran.Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran.Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran.Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran.Background Infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) is one of the main causes of serious complications and death in preterm infants. Both Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) are known as the most common treatment strategies for IRDS. The present study intended to compare NCPAP and NIPPV in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Materials and Methods To this double blind clinical trial study during a one-year period (2016 to 2017) in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan city (Iran), about 60 preterm RDS infants were randomly assigned into two treatment groups; the NIPPV group received the PIP (14–20 cmH2O), RR: 30-50/min, PEEP (5–6 cmH2O), FiO2 up to 60%. The NCPAP group received PEEP (5-6 cmH2o), Flow: 6-7 L/min, and FiO2 up to 60% Results There was not any significant difference in the mean values of gestational age (30.07±1.50 vs. 30.07±2.05; P>0.05), birth weight (1259±263 vs. 1235±285; P>0.05), and 1-minute Apgar score (5.53±1.13 vs. 5.33±1.34; P>0.05) between NIPPV and NCPAP treatment groups. Besides, the rate of recovery, mortality and disease complications was not significantly different between both groups. However, the duration of respiratory support was less in NIPPV than NCPAP (34.9±33.8 vs. 68.4±32 h; P=0.001). Conclusion According to the results, there was not significant advantage between the NIPPV vs. NCPAP methods in the treatment of RDS in preterm infants with very low birth weight.http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/article_10776_073023203a9de5c3d06bb5b36587106e.pdfinfantNCPAPNIPPVPreterm infantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei
Behnaz Basiri
Maryam Shokouhi
Maryam Naser
spellingShingle Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei
Behnaz Basiri
Maryam Shokouhi
Maryam Naser
A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
International Journal of Pediatrics
infant
NCPAP
NIPPV
Preterm infants
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
author_facet Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei
Behnaz Basiri
Maryam Shokouhi
Maryam Naser
author_sort Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei
title A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
title_short A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
title_full A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
title_sort comparative study of treatment response of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Pediatrics
issn 2345-5047
2345-5055
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background Infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) is one of the main causes of serious complications and death in preterm infants. Both Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) are known as the most common treatment strategies for IRDS. The present study intended to compare NCPAP and NIPPV in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Materials and Methods To this double blind clinical trial study during a one-year period (2016 to 2017) in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan city (Iran), about 60 preterm RDS infants were randomly assigned into two treatment groups; the NIPPV group received the PIP (14–20 cmH2O), RR: 30-50/min, PEEP (5–6 cmH2O), FiO2 up to 60%. The NCPAP group received PEEP (5-6 cmH2o), Flow: 6-7 L/min, and FiO2 up to 60% Results There was not any significant difference in the mean values of gestational age (30.07±1.50 vs. 30.07±2.05; P>0.05), birth weight (1259±263 vs. 1235±285; P>0.05), and 1-minute Apgar score (5.53±1.13 vs. 5.33±1.34; P>0.05) between NIPPV and NCPAP treatment groups. Besides, the rate of recovery, mortality and disease complications was not significantly different between both groups. However, the duration of respiratory support was less in NIPPV than NCPAP (34.9±33.8 vs. 68.4±32 h; P=0.001). Conclusion According to the results, there was not significant advantage between the NIPPV vs. NCPAP methods in the treatment of RDS in preterm infants with very low birth weight.
topic infant
NCPAP
NIPPV
Preterm infants
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
url http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/article_10776_073023203a9de5c3d06bb5b36587106e.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadkazemsabzehei acomparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT behnazbasiri acomparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT maryamshokouhi acomparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT maryamnaser acomparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT mohammadkazemsabzehei comparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT behnazbasiri comparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT maryamshokouhi comparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
AT maryamnaser comparativestudyoftreatmentresponseofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantsearlynasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationversusearlynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressure
_version_ 1725203457345847296