The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND:Changes in physical activity (PA) are difficult to interpret because no framework of minimal important difference (MID) exists. We aimed to determine the minimal important difference (MID) in physical activity (PA) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and to clinically v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heleen Demeyer, Chris Burtin, Miek Hornikx, Carlos Augusto Camillo, Hans Van Remoortel, Daniel Langer, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4849755?pdf=render
id doaj-4e37bb7c0e434c09a42120ce7132d38f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e37bb7c0e434c09a42120ce7132d38f2020-11-25T01:38:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01114e015458710.1371/journal.pone.0154587The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.Heleen DemeyerChris BurtinMiek HornikxCarlos Augusto CamilloHans Van RemoortelDaniel LangerWim JanssensThierry TroostersBACKGROUND:Changes in physical activity (PA) are difficult to interpret because no framework of minimal important difference (MID) exists. We aimed to determine the minimal important difference (MID) in physical activity (PA) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and to clinically validate this MID by evaluating its impact on time to first COPD-related hospitalization. METHODS:PA was objectively measured for one week in 74 patients before and after three months of rehabilitation (rehabilitation sample). In addition the intraclass correlation coefficient was measured in 30 patients (test-retest sample), by measuring PA for two consecutive weeks. Daily number of steps was chosen as outcome measurement. Different distribution and anchor based methods were chosen to calculate the MID. Time to first hospitalization due to an exacerbation was compared between patients exceeding the MID and those who did not. RESULTS:Calculation of the MID resulted in 599 (Standard Error of Measurement), 1029 (empirical rule effect size), 1072 (Cohen's effect size) and 1131 (0.5SD) steps.day-1. An anchor based estimation could not be obtained because of the lack of a sufficiently related anchor. The time to the first hospital admission was significantly different between patients exceeding the MID and patients who did not, using the Standard Error of Measurement as cutoff. CONCLUSIONS:The MID after pulmonary rehabilitation lies between 600 and 1100 steps.day-1. The clinical importance of this change is supported by a reduced risk for hospital admission in those patients with more than 600 steps improvement.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4849755?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heleen Demeyer
Chris Burtin
Miek Hornikx
Carlos Augusto Camillo
Hans Van Remoortel
Daniel Langer
Wim Janssens
Thierry Troosters
spellingShingle Heleen Demeyer
Chris Burtin
Miek Hornikx
Carlos Augusto Camillo
Hans Van Remoortel
Daniel Langer
Wim Janssens
Thierry Troosters
The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Heleen Demeyer
Chris Burtin
Miek Hornikx
Carlos Augusto Camillo
Hans Van Remoortel
Daniel Langer
Wim Janssens
Thierry Troosters
author_sort Heleen Demeyer
title The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
title_short The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
title_full The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
title_fullStr The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
title_full_unstemmed The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD.
title_sort minimal important difference in physical activity in patients with copd.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Changes in physical activity (PA) are difficult to interpret because no framework of minimal important difference (MID) exists. We aimed to determine the minimal important difference (MID) in physical activity (PA) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and to clinically validate this MID by evaluating its impact on time to first COPD-related hospitalization. METHODS:PA was objectively measured for one week in 74 patients before and after three months of rehabilitation (rehabilitation sample). In addition the intraclass correlation coefficient was measured in 30 patients (test-retest sample), by measuring PA for two consecutive weeks. Daily number of steps was chosen as outcome measurement. Different distribution and anchor based methods were chosen to calculate the MID. Time to first hospitalization due to an exacerbation was compared between patients exceeding the MID and those who did not. RESULTS:Calculation of the MID resulted in 599 (Standard Error of Measurement), 1029 (empirical rule effect size), 1072 (Cohen's effect size) and 1131 (0.5SD) steps.day-1. An anchor based estimation could not be obtained because of the lack of a sufficiently related anchor. The time to the first hospital admission was significantly different between patients exceeding the MID and patients who did not, using the Standard Error of Measurement as cutoff. CONCLUSIONS:The MID after pulmonary rehabilitation lies between 600 and 1100 steps.day-1. The clinical importance of this change is supported by a reduced risk for hospital admission in those patients with more than 600 steps improvement.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4849755?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT heleendemeyer theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT chrisburtin theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT miekhornikx theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT carlosaugustocamillo theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT hansvanremoortel theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT daniellanger theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT wimjanssens theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT thierrytroosters theminimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT heleendemeyer minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT chrisburtin minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT miekhornikx minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT carlosaugustocamillo minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT hansvanremoortel minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT daniellanger minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT wimjanssens minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
AT thierrytroosters minimalimportantdifferenceinphysicalactivityinpatientswithcopd
_version_ 1725055799764451328