How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
Abstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structure...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5 |
id |
doaj-4e3fcae0ff11440c85f84bd0ec464df9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e3fcae0ff11440c85f84bd0ec464df92020-11-25T03:55:45ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-10-0120111110.1186/s12909-020-02256-5How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection abilityGunver Lillevang0Helle Ibsen1Søren Hast Prins2Niels Kristian Kjaer3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of CopenhagenThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern DenmarkCentre for Health Sciences Education, Health, Aarhus UniversityThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern DenmarkAbstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. Methods In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. Results Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. Conclusions We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5Educational assessmentReflectionMedical postgraduate educationGeneral practice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gunver Lillevang Helle Ibsen Søren Hast Prins Niels Kristian Kjaer |
spellingShingle |
Gunver Lillevang Helle Ibsen Søren Hast Prins Niels Kristian Kjaer How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability BMC Medical Education Educational assessment Reflection Medical postgraduate education General practice |
author_facet |
Gunver Lillevang Helle Ibsen Søren Hast Prins Niels Kristian Kjaer |
author_sort |
Gunver Lillevang |
title |
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_short |
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_full |
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_fullStr |
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_sort |
how to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Education |
issn |
1472-6920 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. Methods In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. Results Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. Conclusions We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies. |
topic |
Educational assessment Reflection Medical postgraduate education General practice |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gunverlillevang howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT helleibsen howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT sørenhastprins howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT nielskristiankjaer howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability |
_version_ |
1724468342753853440 |