How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability

Abstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gunver Lillevang, Helle Ibsen, Søren Hast Prins, Niels Kristian Kjaer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5
id doaj-4e3fcae0ff11440c85f84bd0ec464df9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e3fcae0ff11440c85f84bd0ec464df92020-11-25T03:55:45ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-10-0120111110.1186/s12909-020-02256-5How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection abilityGunver Lillevang0Helle Ibsen1Søren Hast Prins2Niels Kristian Kjaer3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of CopenhagenThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern DenmarkCentre for Health Sciences Education, Health, Aarhus UniversityThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern DenmarkAbstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. Methods In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. Results Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. Conclusions We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5Educational assessmentReflectionMedical postgraduate educationGeneral practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gunver Lillevang
Helle Ibsen
Søren Hast Prins
Niels Kristian Kjaer
spellingShingle Gunver Lillevang
Helle Ibsen
Søren Hast Prins
Niels Kristian Kjaer
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
BMC Medical Education
Educational assessment
Reflection
Medical postgraduate education
General practice
author_facet Gunver Lillevang
Helle Ibsen
Søren Hast Prins
Niels Kristian Kjaer
author_sort Gunver Lillevang
title How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
title_short How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
title_full How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
title_fullStr How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
title_full_unstemmed How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
title_sort how to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Background In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. Methods In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. Results Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. Conclusions We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies.
topic Educational assessment
Reflection
Medical postgraduate education
General practice
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gunverlillevang howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability
AT helleibsen howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability
AT sørenhastprins howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability
AT nielskristiankjaer howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability
_version_ 1724468342753853440