Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

When faced with sensory stimuli, an organism may be required to detect very small differences in a physical parameter (discrimination), while in other situations it may have to generalize over many possible values of the same physical parameter. This decision may be based both on learned information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Livia de Hoz, Israel Nelken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3954732?pdf=render
id doaj-4e6b8ed1f1884bfe8b5f273b23ce0c71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e6b8ed1f1884bfe8b5f273b23ce0c712020-11-25T02:47:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9167610.1371/journal.pone.0091676Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.Livia de HozIsrael NelkenWhen faced with sensory stimuli, an organism may be required to detect very small differences in a physical parameter (discrimination), while in other situations it may have to generalize over many possible values of the same physical parameter. This decision may be based both on learned information and on sensory aspects of perception. In the present study we describe frequency processing in the behaving mouse using both discrimination and generalization as two key aspects of behaviour. We used a novel naturalistic behavioural apparatus designed for mice, the Audiobox, and paradigm contingencies that were identical for both auditory discrimination and generalization, the latter measured using latent inhibition. Mice learned to discriminate between frequencies that were an octave apart in a single trial. They showed significant discrimination between tone frequencies that were as close as 4-7%, and had d' of about 1 for ΔF of around 10%. In contrast, pre-exposure frequencies that were half an octave or less below the conditioned tone elicited latent inhibition, showing a generalization bandwidth of at least half an octave. Thus, in the same apparatus and using the same general memory paradigm, mice showed generalization gradients that were considerably wider than their discrimination threshold, indicating that environmental requirements and previous experience can determine whether the same two frequencies will be considered same or different. Remarkably, generalization gradients paralleled the typical bandwidths established in the auditory periphery and midbrain, suggesting that frequencies may be considered similar when falling within the same critical band.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3954732?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Livia de Hoz
Israel Nelken
spellingShingle Livia de Hoz
Israel Nelken
Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Livia de Hoz
Israel Nelken
author_sort Livia de Hoz
title Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
title_short Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
title_full Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
title_fullStr Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
title_full_unstemmed Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
title_sort frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description When faced with sensory stimuli, an organism may be required to detect very small differences in a physical parameter (discrimination), while in other situations it may have to generalize over many possible values of the same physical parameter. This decision may be based both on learned information and on sensory aspects of perception. In the present study we describe frequency processing in the behaving mouse using both discrimination and generalization as two key aspects of behaviour. We used a novel naturalistic behavioural apparatus designed for mice, the Audiobox, and paradigm contingencies that were identical for both auditory discrimination and generalization, the latter measured using latent inhibition. Mice learned to discriminate between frequencies that were an octave apart in a single trial. They showed significant discrimination between tone frequencies that were as close as 4-7%, and had d' of about 1 for ΔF of around 10%. In contrast, pre-exposure frequencies that were half an octave or less below the conditioned tone elicited latent inhibition, showing a generalization bandwidth of at least half an octave. Thus, in the same apparatus and using the same general memory paradigm, mice showed generalization gradients that were considerably wider than their discrimination threshold, indicating that environmental requirements and previous experience can determine whether the same two frequencies will be considered same or different. Remarkably, generalization gradients paralleled the typical bandwidths established in the auditory periphery and midbrain, suggesting that frequencies may be considered similar when falling within the same critical band.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3954732?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT liviadehoz frequencytuninginthebehavingmousedifferentbandwidthsfordiscriminationandgeneralization
AT israelnelken frequencytuninginthebehavingmousedifferentbandwidthsfordiscriminationandgeneralization
_version_ 1724753802199826432