Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Multiple processes may contribute to motor skill acquisition, but it is thought that many of these processes require sleep or the passage of long periods of time ranging from several hours to many days or weeks. Here we demonstrate that within a timescale of minutes, two distinct fast-acting process...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maurice A Smith, Ali Ghazizadeh, Reza Shadmehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2006-06-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1463025?pdf=render
id doaj-4e92e636c37c4848b2d0cbb8fe8b7621
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e92e636c37c4848b2d0cbb8fe8b76212021-07-02T14:41:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852006-06-0146e17910.1371/journal.pbio.0040179Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.Maurice A SmithAli GhazizadehReza ShadmehrMultiple processes may contribute to motor skill acquisition, but it is thought that many of these processes require sleep or the passage of long periods of time ranging from several hours to many days or weeks. Here we demonstrate that within a timescale of minutes, two distinct fast-acting processes drive motor adaptation. One process responds weakly to error but retains information well, whereas the other responds strongly but has poor retention. This two-state learning system makes the surprising prediction of spontaneous recovery (or adaptation rebound) if error feedback is clamped at zero following an adaptation-extinction training episode. We used a novel paradigm to experimentally confirm this prediction in human motor learning of reaching, and we show that the interaction between the learning processes in this simple two-state system provides a unifying explanation for several different, apparently unrelated, phenomena in motor adaptation including savings, anterograde interference, spontaneous recovery, and rapid unlearning. Our results suggest that motor adaptation depends on at least two distinct neural systems that have different sensitivity to error and retain information at different rates.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1463025?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maurice A Smith
Ali Ghazizadeh
Reza Shadmehr
spellingShingle Maurice A Smith
Ali Ghazizadeh
Reza Shadmehr
Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Maurice A Smith
Ali Ghazizadeh
Reza Shadmehr
author_sort Maurice A Smith
title Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
title_short Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
title_full Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
title_fullStr Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
title_full_unstemmed Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
title_sort interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2006-06-01
description Multiple processes may contribute to motor skill acquisition, but it is thought that many of these processes require sleep or the passage of long periods of time ranging from several hours to many days or weeks. Here we demonstrate that within a timescale of minutes, two distinct fast-acting processes drive motor adaptation. One process responds weakly to error but retains information well, whereas the other responds strongly but has poor retention. This two-state learning system makes the surprising prediction of spontaneous recovery (or adaptation rebound) if error feedback is clamped at zero following an adaptation-extinction training episode. We used a novel paradigm to experimentally confirm this prediction in human motor learning of reaching, and we show that the interaction between the learning processes in this simple two-state system provides a unifying explanation for several different, apparently unrelated, phenomena in motor adaptation including savings, anterograde interference, spontaneous recovery, and rapid unlearning. Our results suggest that motor adaptation depends on at least two distinct neural systems that have different sensitivity to error and retain information at different rates.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1463025?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mauriceasmith interactingadaptiveprocesseswithdifferenttimescalesunderlieshorttermmotorlearning
AT alighazizadeh interactingadaptiveprocesseswithdifferenttimescalesunderlieshorttermmotorlearning
AT rezashadmehr interactingadaptiveprocesseswithdifferenttimescalesunderlieshorttermmotorlearning
_version_ 1721327806003019776