Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis

Recent studies have suggested a negative impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct acting antivirals (DAAs). We compared the effectiveness of DAAs in patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC, and in those with HCC partially...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kavita Radhakrishnan, Adrian M. Di Bisceglie, K. Rajender Reddy, Joseph K. Lim, Josh Levitsky, Mohamed A. Hassan, Jama M. Darling, Jordan J. Feld, Lucy Akushevich, Monika Vainorius, David R. Nelson, Michael W. Fried, Robert S. Brown Jr., Norah A. Terrault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-10-01
Series:Hepatology Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1412
id doaj-4e9e0104dcf848c6a5db6f6caa6f34fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e9e0104dcf848c6a5db6f6caa6f34fe2020-11-24T22:07:23ZengWileyHepatology Communications2471-254X2019-10-013101388139910.1002/hep4.1412Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET AnalysisKavita Radhakrishnan0Adrian M. Di Bisceglie1K. Rajender Reddy2Joseph K. Lim3Josh Levitsky4Mohamed A. Hassan5Jama M. Darling6Jordan J. Feld7Lucy Akushevich8Monika Vainorius9David R. Nelson10Michael W. Fried11Robert S. Brown Jr.12Norah A. Terrault13University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CASt. Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis MOUniversity of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PAYale University School of Medicine New Haven CTNorthwestern University Evanston ILUniversity of Minnesota Minneapolis MNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NCToronto Western Hospital Liver Center Toronto CanadaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NCUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NCUniversity of Florida Gainesville FLUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NCWeill Cornell Medical College New York NYKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles CARecent studies have suggested a negative impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct acting antivirals (DAAs). We compared the effectiveness of DAAs in patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC, and in those with HCC partially treated or untreated (PT/UT‐HCC) versus completely treated (CT‐HCC). HCC status was based on imaging 6 months before or 2 months after start of DAA therapy. Absence and presence of enhancing lesions after HCC treatment defined CT‐HCC and PT/UT‐HCC, respectively. Using minimally adjusted logistic regression, the association between the presence of HCC and SVR rates was estimated. Among the 1,457 patients with cirrhosis from HCV‐TARGET with complete virologic data (per‐protocol population) who did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment and followup, 1,300 were without HCC, 91 with CT‐HCC, and 66 with PT/UT‐HCC. Most patients were genotype 1 (81%) and treatment‐experienced (56%), 41% had history of prior decompensation, and the median pretreatment Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease was 9 (range 6‐39). The SVR rates were 91% for patients without HCC, 84% for CT‐HCC, and 80% for PT/UT‐HCC. The presence of HCC (versus not having HCC) was associated with significantly lower odds of achieving SVR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33‐0.81; P = 0.003). However, among those with HCC, HCC treatment status (PT/UT‐HCC versus CT‐HCC) did not show association with SVR (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.35‐1.79, P = 0.569). Conclusions: The presence of HCC reduces the likelihood of SVR by 50%, but with no evident difference in those with completely treated HCC versus partially treated/untreated HCC.https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1412
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kavita Radhakrishnan
Adrian M. Di Bisceglie
K. Rajender Reddy
Joseph K. Lim
Josh Levitsky
Mohamed A. Hassan
Jama M. Darling
Jordan J. Feld
Lucy Akushevich
Monika Vainorius
David R. Nelson
Michael W. Fried
Robert S. Brown Jr.
Norah A. Terrault
spellingShingle Kavita Radhakrishnan
Adrian M. Di Bisceglie
K. Rajender Reddy
Joseph K. Lim
Josh Levitsky
Mohamed A. Hassan
Jama M. Darling
Jordan J. Feld
Lucy Akushevich
Monika Vainorius
David R. Nelson
Michael W. Fried
Robert S. Brown Jr.
Norah A. Terrault
Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
Hepatology Communications
author_facet Kavita Radhakrishnan
Adrian M. Di Bisceglie
K. Rajender Reddy
Joseph K. Lim
Josh Levitsky
Mohamed A. Hassan
Jama M. Darling
Jordan J. Feld
Lucy Akushevich
Monika Vainorius
David R. Nelson
Michael W. Fried
Robert S. Brown Jr.
Norah A. Terrault
author_sort Kavita Radhakrishnan
title Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
title_short Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
title_full Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
title_fullStr Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response: An HCV‐TARGET Analysis
title_sort treatment status of hepatocellular carcinoma does not influence rates of sustained virologic response: an hcv‐target analysis
publisher Wiley
series Hepatology Communications
issn 2471-254X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Recent studies have suggested a negative impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct acting antivirals (DAAs). We compared the effectiveness of DAAs in patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC, and in those with HCC partially treated or untreated (PT/UT‐HCC) versus completely treated (CT‐HCC). HCC status was based on imaging 6 months before or 2 months after start of DAA therapy. Absence and presence of enhancing lesions after HCC treatment defined CT‐HCC and PT/UT‐HCC, respectively. Using minimally adjusted logistic regression, the association between the presence of HCC and SVR rates was estimated. Among the 1,457 patients with cirrhosis from HCV‐TARGET with complete virologic data (per‐protocol population) who did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment and followup, 1,300 were without HCC, 91 with CT‐HCC, and 66 with PT/UT‐HCC. Most patients were genotype 1 (81%) and treatment‐experienced (56%), 41% had history of prior decompensation, and the median pretreatment Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease was 9 (range 6‐39). The SVR rates were 91% for patients without HCC, 84% for CT‐HCC, and 80% for PT/UT‐HCC. The presence of HCC (versus not having HCC) was associated with significantly lower odds of achieving SVR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33‐0.81; P = 0.003). However, among those with HCC, HCC treatment status (PT/UT‐HCC versus CT‐HCC) did not show association with SVR (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.35‐1.79, P = 0.569). Conclusions: The presence of HCC reduces the likelihood of SVR by 50%, but with no evident difference in those with completely treated HCC versus partially treated/untreated HCC.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1412
work_keys_str_mv AT kavitaradhakrishnan treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT adrianmdibisceglie treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT krajenderreddy treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT josephklim treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT joshlevitsky treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT mohamedahassan treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT jamamdarling treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT jordanjfeld treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT lucyakushevich treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT monikavainorius treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT davidrnelson treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT michaelwfried treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT robertsbrownjr treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
AT norahaterrault treatmentstatusofhepatocellularcarcinomadoesnotinfluenceratesofsustainedvirologicresponseanhcvtargetanalysis
_version_ 1725820748814090240