Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tennis elbow is a common and often extremely painful musculoskeletal condition, which has considerable impact on individuals as well as economic implications for healthcare utilization and absence from work. Many management strategie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Warlow Catherine, Mason Elizabeth E, Mallen Christian D, Lewis Martyn, Sim Julius, van der Windt Daniëlle A, Chesterton Linda S, Vohora Kanchan, Hay Elaine M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156
id doaj-4ea9a2666cc646608aeb204fb015d887
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ea9a2666cc646608aeb204fb015d8872020-11-24T23:05:18ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742009-12-0110115610.1186/1471-2474-10-156Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)Warlow CatherineMason Elizabeth EMallen Christian DLewis MartynSim Juliusvan der Windt Daniëlle AChesterton Linda SVohora KanchanHay Elaine M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tennis elbow is a common and often extremely painful musculoskeletal condition, which has considerable impact on individuals as well as economic implications for healthcare utilization and absence from work. Many management strategies have been studied in clinical trials. Whilst corticosteroid injections offer short term pain relief, this treatment is unpleasant and is used with caution due to an associated high risk of pain recurrence in the long term. Systematic reviews conclude that there is no clear and effective treatment for symptoms of pain in the first 6 weeks of the condition. There is a clear need for an intervention that is acceptable to patients and provides them with effective short-term pain relief without increasing the risk of recurrence. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an inexpensive, non-invasive, non-pharmacological form of analgesia that is commonly used in the treatment of pain. TENS has very few contraindications and is simple to apply. It also benefits from being patient controlled, thereby promoting self-management. This study aims to assess the effectiveness, in terms of pain relief, and cost-effectiveness of a self-management package of treatment that includes TENS.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The design of the study will be a two-group pragmatic randomized clinical trial. 240 participants aged 18 years and over with tennis elbow will be recruited from 20-30 GP practices in Staffordshire, UK. Participants are to be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either primary care management (standard GP consultation, medication, advice and education) or primary care management with the addition of TENS, over 6 weeks. Our primary outcome measure is average intensity of elbow pain in the past 24 hours (0-10 point numerical rating scale) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain and limitation of function, global assessment of change, days of sick leave, illness perceptions, and overall health status. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. Patient adherence and satisfaction data will be collected at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months by postal questionnaire. A diary will also be completed for the first 2 weeks of treatment. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out using an intention-to-treat approach as the primary analysis.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This paper presents detail on the rationale, design, methods and operational aspects of the trial.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials. ISRCTN87141084</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Warlow Catherine
Mason Elizabeth E
Mallen Christian D
Lewis Martyn
Sim Julius
van der Windt Daniëlle A
Chesterton Linda S
Vohora Kanchan
Hay Elaine M
spellingShingle Warlow Catherine
Mason Elizabeth E
Mallen Christian D
Lewis Martyn
Sim Julius
van der Windt Daniëlle A
Chesterton Linda S
Vohora Kanchan
Hay Elaine M
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet Warlow Catherine
Mason Elizabeth E
Mallen Christian D
Lewis Martyn
Sim Julius
van der Windt Daniëlle A
Chesterton Linda S
Vohora Kanchan
Hay Elaine M
author_sort Warlow Catherine
title Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
title_short Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
title_full Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
title_fullStr Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084)
title_sort transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the tate trial (isrctn 87141084)
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tennis elbow is a common and often extremely painful musculoskeletal condition, which has considerable impact on individuals as well as economic implications for healthcare utilization and absence from work. Many management strategies have been studied in clinical trials. Whilst corticosteroid injections offer short term pain relief, this treatment is unpleasant and is used with caution due to an associated high risk of pain recurrence in the long term. Systematic reviews conclude that there is no clear and effective treatment for symptoms of pain in the first 6 weeks of the condition. There is a clear need for an intervention that is acceptable to patients and provides them with effective short-term pain relief without increasing the risk of recurrence. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an inexpensive, non-invasive, non-pharmacological form of analgesia that is commonly used in the treatment of pain. TENS has very few contraindications and is simple to apply. It also benefits from being patient controlled, thereby promoting self-management. This study aims to assess the effectiveness, in terms of pain relief, and cost-effectiveness of a self-management package of treatment that includes TENS.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The design of the study will be a two-group pragmatic randomized clinical trial. 240 participants aged 18 years and over with tennis elbow will be recruited from 20-30 GP practices in Staffordshire, UK. Participants are to be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either primary care management (standard GP consultation, medication, advice and education) or primary care management with the addition of TENS, over 6 weeks. Our primary outcome measure is average intensity of elbow pain in the past 24 hours (0-10 point numerical rating scale) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain and limitation of function, global assessment of change, days of sick leave, illness perceptions, and overall health status. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. Patient adherence and satisfaction data will be collected at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months by postal questionnaire. A diary will also be completed for the first 2 weeks of treatment. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out using an intention-to-treat approach as the primary analysis.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This paper presents detail on the rationale, design, methods and operational aspects of the trial.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials. ISRCTN87141084</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156
work_keys_str_mv AT warlowcatherine transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT masonelizabethe transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT mallenchristiand transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT lewismartyn transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT simjulius transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT vanderwindtdaniellea transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT chestertonlindas transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT vohorakanchan transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
AT hayelainem transcutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthemanagementoftenniselbowapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialthetatetrialisrctn87141084
_version_ 1725626463494864896