Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is considered the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study compares the door-to-balloon (D2B) time between transradial vs. the transfemoral approach in patients present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osama Tayeh, Federica Ettori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260813001191
id doaj-4ed2523069b140a79899bc6f44197530
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ed2523069b140a79899bc6f441975302020-11-25T01:37:52ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Heart Journal1110-26082014-06-0166215516210.1016/j.ehj.2013.11.003Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionOsama Tayeh0Federica Ettori1Critical Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptCardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili, Brescia University, ItalyPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is considered the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study compares the door-to-balloon (D2B) time between transradial vs. the transfemoral approach in patients presenting with STEMI. Methods: A retrospectively collected catheterization laboratory database was reviewed for the consecutive patients presenting with a STEMI. Specific time parameters were recorded, and our composite end points were time to revascularization, angiographic success, short term clinical success, and procedural vascular complications. Results: Radial PCI (r-PCI) was performed in 33 patients (67.3%) and in 16 patients (32.7%) PCI was done through femoral artery (f-PCI). No significant difference was observed in the pre-catheter and catheter laboratory times. Mean times from emergency room door-to-catheter laboratory time for r-PCI vs. f-PCI were 82.48 ± 37.42 and 76.29 ± 34.32 min, respectively (P = 0.636). The mean time from patient arrival to the cardiac catheter laboratory-to-balloon inflation was 34.56 ± 14.2 in the r-PCI group vs. 33.12 ± 12.56 min with the f-PCI group (P = 0.215). The total D2B time was not significantly different between r-PCI vs. f-PCI groups (100.32 ± 36.3 vs. 97.31 ± 30.37 min, respectively, P = 0.522). Angiographic success rates were observed in 92.1% of the patients for r-PCI, and in 87.5% for f-PCI (P = 0.712). There were no vascular complications in both groups. Conclusions: Patients presenting with STEMI can undergo successful pPCI via radial artery without compromising patient care.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260813001191Primary percutaneous coronary interventionRadialFemoralMyocardial infarction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Osama Tayeh
Federica Ettori
spellingShingle Osama Tayeh
Federica Ettori
Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
The Egyptian Heart Journal
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Radial
Femoral
Myocardial infarction
author_facet Osama Tayeh
Federica Ettori
author_sort Osama Tayeh
title Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort door-to-balloon time in radial versus femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Heart Journal
issn 1110-2608
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is considered the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study compares the door-to-balloon (D2B) time between transradial vs. the transfemoral approach in patients presenting with STEMI. Methods: A retrospectively collected catheterization laboratory database was reviewed for the consecutive patients presenting with a STEMI. Specific time parameters were recorded, and our composite end points were time to revascularization, angiographic success, short term clinical success, and procedural vascular complications. Results: Radial PCI (r-PCI) was performed in 33 patients (67.3%) and in 16 patients (32.7%) PCI was done through femoral artery (f-PCI). No significant difference was observed in the pre-catheter and catheter laboratory times. Mean times from emergency room door-to-catheter laboratory time for r-PCI vs. f-PCI were 82.48 ± 37.42 and 76.29 ± 34.32 min, respectively (P = 0.636). The mean time from patient arrival to the cardiac catheter laboratory-to-balloon inflation was 34.56 ± 14.2 in the r-PCI group vs. 33.12 ± 12.56 min with the f-PCI group (P = 0.215). The total D2B time was not significantly different between r-PCI vs. f-PCI groups (100.32 ± 36.3 vs. 97.31 ± 30.37 min, respectively, P = 0.522). Angiographic success rates were observed in 92.1% of the patients for r-PCI, and in 87.5% for f-PCI (P = 0.712). There were no vascular complications in both groups. Conclusions: Patients presenting with STEMI can undergo successful pPCI via radial artery without compromising patient care.
topic Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Radial
Femoral
Myocardial infarction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260813001191
work_keys_str_mv AT osamatayeh doortoballoontimeinradialversusfemoralapproachforprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT federicaettori doortoballoontimeinradialversusfemoralapproachforprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1725056764318056448