Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses

AimThis study aimed to compare different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) prediction models, namely, the Simple Rules (SRs) the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) models, and the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), for the pre-operative diagnosis of adne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Le Qian, Qinwen Du, Meijiao Jiang, Fei Yuan, Hui Chen, Weiwei Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.673722/full
id doaj-4ee44935a20546a7bf9503b153179657
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ee44935a20546a7bf9503b1531796572021-06-01T04:55:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-06-011110.3389/fonc.2021.673722673722Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal MassesLe Qian0Qinwen Du1Meijiao Jiang2Fei Yuan3Hui Chen4Weiwei Feng5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaAimThis study aimed to compare different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) prediction models, namely, the Simple Rules (SRs) the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) models, and the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), for the pre-operative diagnosis of adnexal mass.MethodsThis single-centre diagnostic accuracy study involved 486 patients. All ultrasound examinations were analyzed and the prediction models were applied. Pathology was the clinical reference standard. The diagnostic performances of prediction models were measured by evaluating receiver-operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios.ResultsTo discriminate benign and malignant tumors, areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for ADNEX models were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) with CA125 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.96) without CA125, which were significantly higher than the AUCs for RMI I-III: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.86), (all P < 0.0001). At a cut-off of 10%, the ADNEX model with CA125 had the highest sensitivity (0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97) compared with the other models. The SRs model achieved a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.89) when inconclusive diagnoses (11.7%) were classified as malignant.ConclusionADNEX and SRs models were excellent at characterising adnexal masses which were superior to the RMI in Chinese patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.673722/fulladnexal masstumordiagnosisultrasonographyprediction model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Le Qian
Qinwen Du
Meijiao Jiang
Fei Yuan
Hui Chen
Weiwei Feng
spellingShingle Le Qian
Qinwen Du
Meijiao Jiang
Fei Yuan
Hui Chen
Weiwei Feng
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
Frontiers in Oncology
adnexal mass
tumor
diagnosis
ultrasonography
prediction model
author_facet Le Qian
Qinwen Du
Meijiao Jiang
Fei Yuan
Hui Chen
Weiwei Feng
author_sort Le Qian
title Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
title_short Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
title_full Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
title_fullStr Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
title_sort comparison of the diagnostic performances of ultrasound-based models for predicting malignancy in patients with adnexal masses
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2021-06-01
description AimThis study aimed to compare different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) prediction models, namely, the Simple Rules (SRs) the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) models, and the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), for the pre-operative diagnosis of adnexal mass.MethodsThis single-centre diagnostic accuracy study involved 486 patients. All ultrasound examinations were analyzed and the prediction models were applied. Pathology was the clinical reference standard. The diagnostic performances of prediction models were measured by evaluating receiver-operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios.ResultsTo discriminate benign and malignant tumors, areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for ADNEX models were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) with CA125 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.96) without CA125, which were significantly higher than the AUCs for RMI I-III: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.86), (all P < 0.0001). At a cut-off of 10%, the ADNEX model with CA125 had the highest sensitivity (0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97) compared with the other models. The SRs model achieved a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.89) when inconclusive diagnoses (11.7%) were classified as malignant.ConclusionADNEX and SRs models were excellent at characterising adnexal masses which were superior to the RMI in Chinese patients.
topic adnexal mass
tumor
diagnosis
ultrasonography
prediction model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.673722/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leqian comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
AT qinwendu comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
AT meijiaojiang comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
AT feiyuan comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
AT huichen comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
AT weiweifeng comparisonofthediagnosticperformancesofultrasoundbasedmodelsforpredictingmalignancyinpatientswithadnexalmasses
_version_ 1721411019136303104