Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe

<p>Crop diversification leads to reduction of water scarcity problems and income inequality in irrigation systems. Irrigated areas have been witnessing a slow diversification from paddy to other field crops (OFC) during yala season. It is noted that other than descriptive comparison of the div...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BAP Kumari, SM Thiruchelvam, HMH Dissanayake, T Lasantha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya 2011-08-01
Series:Tropical Agricultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tar.sljol.info/articles/3307
id doaj-4f33244c50a944ad8343606a31dc5e3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f33244c50a944ad8343606a31dc5e3a2020-11-25T01:52:35ZengPostgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of PeradeniyaTropical Agricultural Research1016-14222011-08-0121330832010.4038/tar.v21i3.33072765Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of MinipeBAP Kumari0SM Thiruchelvam1HMH Dissanayake2T Lasantha3Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture University of Peradeniya, PeradeniyaDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Business Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, PeradeniyaAgriculture Settlement Scheme, Morayaya, MinipeDivisional Irrigation Engineer, Minipe Division, Hasalaka<p>Crop diversification leads to reduction of water scarcity problems and income inequality in irrigation systems. Irrigated areas have been witnessing a slow diversification from paddy to other field crops (OFC) during yala season. It is noted that other than descriptive comparison of the diversification potential in irrigation systems, no research effort has been made to compare agricultural economic variables. In this context, present study examines the determinants of crop diversification from paddy to OFC and explores income inequality in the Minipe major irrigation scheme. Data were collected from 90 farm-households selected from Stage I (head end - H) and IV (tail end - T) of the scheme using stratified random sampling method during April and May 2009. Comparative analysis and the binomial logit model were employed.</p> <p>The study revealed that OFCs have comparative advantage over paddy for the land that does not get adequate irrigation water for paddy cultivation in yala season. The logit analysis reveals that farmers in responding to crop diversification opportunities are constrained by the inactive farmer organization (FO), markets, and poor irrigation infrastructure. This analysis also showed that the probability of the diversification was determined by family labour, FOs&rsquo; collective action including irrigation management and market arrangement. Gini coefficient (GC) estimations showed that there is relatively lower income inequity (GC 0.34) in Stage I compared to Stage IV (0.41). A significant proportion (27%) of total income was derived from non farm activities in stage IV, whereas it was only 10% in the case of stage I. The farmers in Stage IV are keen and prepared for crop diversification. Therefore, enhancement of FO capacity in water management and market-oriented production in the irrigation system is important.</p> <p>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i3.3307</p> <p><em>TAR </em>2010; 21(3): 308-320</p>https://tar.sljol.info/articles/3307crop diversificationincome inequalityirrigation systems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author BAP Kumari
SM Thiruchelvam
HMH Dissanayake
T Lasantha
spellingShingle BAP Kumari
SM Thiruchelvam
HMH Dissanayake
T Lasantha
Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
Tropical Agricultural Research
crop diversification
income inequality
irrigation systems
author_facet BAP Kumari
SM Thiruchelvam
HMH Dissanayake
T Lasantha
author_sort BAP Kumari
title Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
title_short Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
title_full Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
title_fullStr Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
title_full_unstemmed Crop Diversification and Income Inequality in Irrigation Systems: The Case of Minipe
title_sort crop diversification and income inequality in irrigation systems: the case of minipe
publisher Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya
series Tropical Agricultural Research
issn 1016-1422
publishDate 2011-08-01
description <p>Crop diversification leads to reduction of water scarcity problems and income inequality in irrigation systems. Irrigated areas have been witnessing a slow diversification from paddy to other field crops (OFC) during yala season. It is noted that other than descriptive comparison of the diversification potential in irrigation systems, no research effort has been made to compare agricultural economic variables. In this context, present study examines the determinants of crop diversification from paddy to OFC and explores income inequality in the Minipe major irrigation scheme. Data were collected from 90 farm-households selected from Stage I (head end - H) and IV (tail end - T) of the scheme using stratified random sampling method during April and May 2009. Comparative analysis and the binomial logit model were employed.</p> <p>The study revealed that OFCs have comparative advantage over paddy for the land that does not get adequate irrigation water for paddy cultivation in yala season. The logit analysis reveals that farmers in responding to crop diversification opportunities are constrained by the inactive farmer organization (FO), markets, and poor irrigation infrastructure. This analysis also showed that the probability of the diversification was determined by family labour, FOs&rsquo; collective action including irrigation management and market arrangement. Gini coefficient (GC) estimations showed that there is relatively lower income inequity (GC 0.34) in Stage I compared to Stage IV (0.41). A significant proportion (27%) of total income was derived from non farm activities in stage IV, whereas it was only 10% in the case of stage I. The farmers in Stage IV are keen and prepared for crop diversification. Therefore, enhancement of FO capacity in water management and market-oriented production in the irrigation system is important.</p> <p>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i3.3307</p> <p><em>TAR </em>2010; 21(3): 308-320</p>
topic crop diversification
income inequality
irrigation systems
url https://tar.sljol.info/articles/3307
work_keys_str_mv AT bapkumari cropdiversificationandincomeinequalityinirrigationsystemsthecaseofminipe
AT smthiruchelvam cropdiversificationandincomeinequalityinirrigationsystemsthecaseofminipe
AT hmhdissanayake cropdiversificationandincomeinequalityinirrigationsystemsthecaseofminipe
AT tlasantha cropdiversificationandincomeinequalityinirrigationsystemsthecaseofminipe
_version_ 1724994300243083264