Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives

This paper contributes to previous research on how politicians use sociolinguistic variables to index their party affiliation, enact stances, and construct political identities. It does so by investigating the 2015 U.S. House of Representatives’ debate on repealing the estate tax, with a focus on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gian Peter Ochsner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh Library 2018-03-01
Series:Lifespans and Styles
Online Access:http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lifespansstyles/article/view/2609
id doaj-4f4635987c394ea4aae11d66c883f459
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f4635987c394ea4aae11d66c883f4592021-04-20T14:08:45ZengUniversity of Edinburgh LibraryLifespans and Styles2057-17202018-03-0141172910.2218/ls.v4i1.2018.26092609Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of RepresentativesGian Peter OchsnerThis paper contributes to previous research on how politicians use sociolinguistic variables to index their party affiliation, enact stances, and construct political identities. It does so by investigating the 2015 U.S. House of Representatives’ debate on repealing the estate tax, with a focus on the indexical meanings of the “American tax variable”, which consists of the lexical variants estate tax and death tax. In the televised debate, 23 speakers use 31 estate tax tokens and 46 death tax tokens. As the results indicate, the estate tax variant indexes an affiliation with the Democrats and a pro-tax stance, whereas the death tax variant is linked with the Republicans and an anti-tax stance. Apart from expressing these conventionalised indexical meanings, House members also style-shift between the variants and employ them to convey interactional stances of (dis)alignment and empathy, construct a political identity of in-betweenness, and promote a conservative version of Americanism.http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lifespansstyles/article/view/2609
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gian Peter Ochsner
spellingShingle Gian Peter Ochsner
Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
Lifespans and Styles
author_facet Gian Peter Ochsner
author_sort Gian Peter Ochsner
title Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
title_short Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
title_full Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
title_fullStr Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
title_full_unstemmed Stylistic Variation and Stancetaking in the U.S. House of Representatives
title_sort stylistic variation and stancetaking in the u.s. house of representatives
publisher University of Edinburgh Library
series Lifespans and Styles
issn 2057-1720
publishDate 2018-03-01
description This paper contributes to previous research on how politicians use sociolinguistic variables to index their party affiliation, enact stances, and construct political identities. It does so by investigating the 2015 U.S. House of Representatives’ debate on repealing the estate tax, with a focus on the indexical meanings of the “American tax variable”, which consists of the lexical variants estate tax and death tax. In the televised debate, 23 speakers use 31 estate tax tokens and 46 death tax tokens. As the results indicate, the estate tax variant indexes an affiliation with the Democrats and a pro-tax stance, whereas the death tax variant is linked with the Republicans and an anti-tax stance. Apart from expressing these conventionalised indexical meanings, House members also style-shift between the variants and employ them to convey interactional stances of (dis)alignment and empathy, construct a political identity of in-betweenness, and promote a conservative version of Americanism.
url http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lifespansstyles/article/view/2609
work_keys_str_mv AT gianpeterochsner stylisticvariationandstancetakingintheushouseofrepresentatives
_version_ 1721517718275883008