Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous

How does spirit appear? In fact, it does not appear, and for this reason, we could refer to it, following Heidegger, as “inconspicuous” (<i>unscheinbar</i>). The Heideggerian path investigates this inconspicuous starting from the Husserlian method, and yet, this is not the only Phenomeno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carla Canullo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/8/558
id doaj-4f58221c23de454eb7245cf5a288753a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f58221c23de454eb7245cf5a288753a2021-08-26T14:16:42ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-07-011255855810.3390/rel12080558Beyond the Phenomenology of the InconspicuousCarla Canullo0Department of “Studi Umanistici”, Philosophy, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, ItalyHow does spirit appear? In fact, it does not appear, and for this reason, we could refer to it, following Heidegger, as “inconspicuous” (<i>unscheinbar</i>). The Heideggerian path investigates this inconspicuous starting from the Husserlian method, and yet, this is not the only Phenomenology of the “Inconspicuous” Spirit: Hegel had already thematized it in 1807. It is thus possible to identify at least two Phenomenologies of the “Inconspicuous” spirit. These two phenomenologies, however, do not simply put forth distinct phenomenological methods, nor do they merely propose differing modes of spirit’s manifestation. In each of these phenomenologies, rather, what we call “spirit” manifests different traits: in one instance, it appears as absolute knowing, and, in the other, it manifests “from itself” as “phenomenon”. Yet how, exactly, does spirit manifest “starting from itself as phenomenon”? Certainly not in the mode of entities, but rather in the modality that historical phenomenology, which also includes Edmund Husserl’s work, has grasped. A question remains, however: is the inconspicuous coextensive with “spirit”? Certainly, spirit is inconspicuous, but it is not only spirit that is such. A certain phenomenological practice understood this well, a practice that several French authors have pushed. Jean-Luc Marion, Michel Henry, and Jean-Louis Chrétien have all contributed, in a certain way, to the phenomenology of the inconspicuous. However, do these authors carry out a phenomenology of inconspicuous <i>spirit</i>? Perhaps what French phenomenology gives us today, after an itinerary that has discovered several senses of the inconspicuous, is precisely the return to spirit that is missing in, and was missed by, this tradition.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/8/558phenomenologyinconspicuousspiritHegelMarionHenry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carla Canullo
spellingShingle Carla Canullo
Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
Religions
phenomenology
inconspicuous
spirit
Hegel
Marion
Henry
author_facet Carla Canullo
author_sort Carla Canullo
title Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
title_short Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
title_full Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
title_fullStr Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
title_full_unstemmed Beyond the Phenomenology of the Inconspicuous
title_sort beyond the phenomenology of the inconspicuous
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-07-01
description How does spirit appear? In fact, it does not appear, and for this reason, we could refer to it, following Heidegger, as “inconspicuous” (<i>unscheinbar</i>). The Heideggerian path investigates this inconspicuous starting from the Husserlian method, and yet, this is not the only Phenomenology of the “Inconspicuous” Spirit: Hegel had already thematized it in 1807. It is thus possible to identify at least two Phenomenologies of the “Inconspicuous” spirit. These two phenomenologies, however, do not simply put forth distinct phenomenological methods, nor do they merely propose differing modes of spirit’s manifestation. In each of these phenomenologies, rather, what we call “spirit” manifests different traits: in one instance, it appears as absolute knowing, and, in the other, it manifests “from itself” as “phenomenon”. Yet how, exactly, does spirit manifest “starting from itself as phenomenon”? Certainly not in the mode of entities, but rather in the modality that historical phenomenology, which also includes Edmund Husserl’s work, has grasped. A question remains, however: is the inconspicuous coextensive with “spirit”? Certainly, spirit is inconspicuous, but it is not only spirit that is such. A certain phenomenological practice understood this well, a practice that several French authors have pushed. Jean-Luc Marion, Michel Henry, and Jean-Louis Chrétien have all contributed, in a certain way, to the phenomenology of the inconspicuous. However, do these authors carry out a phenomenology of inconspicuous <i>spirit</i>? Perhaps what French phenomenology gives us today, after an itinerary that has discovered several senses of the inconspicuous, is precisely the return to spirit that is missing in, and was missed by, this tradition.
topic phenomenology
inconspicuous
spirit
Hegel
Marion
Henry
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/8/558
work_keys_str_mv AT carlacanullo beyondthephenomenologyoftheinconspicuous
_version_ 1721190376757264384