IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers
<i>Background </i>: Ten to fourteen percent of Ewing sarcoma (ES) study participants treated nationwide with IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)-targeted antibodies achieved tumor regression. Despite this success, low response rates and short response durations (approximately 7-weeks) have slowed th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Cancers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/7/1768 |
id |
doaj-4f901aa147324dbfbd9a05ca91dd7d57 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hesham M. Amin Ajaykumar C. Morani Najat C. Daw Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi Vivek Subbiah Brian A. Menegaz Deeksha Vishwamitra Ghazaleh Eskandari Bhawana George Robert S. Benjamin Shreyaskumar Patel Juhee Song Alexander J. Lazar Wei-Lien Wang Razelle Kurzrock Alberto Pappo Peter M. Anderson Gary K. Schwartz Dejka Araujo Branko Cuglievan Ravin Ratan David McCall Sana Mohiuddin John A. Livingston Eric R. Molina Aung Naing Joseph A. Ludwig |
spellingShingle |
Hesham M. Amin Ajaykumar C. Morani Najat C. Daw Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi Vivek Subbiah Brian A. Menegaz Deeksha Vishwamitra Ghazaleh Eskandari Bhawana George Robert S. Benjamin Shreyaskumar Patel Juhee Song Alexander J. Lazar Wei-Lien Wang Razelle Kurzrock Alberto Pappo Peter M. Anderson Gary K. Schwartz Dejka Araujo Branko Cuglievan Ravin Ratan David McCall Sana Mohiuddin John A. Livingston Eric R. Molina Aung Naing Joseph A. Ludwig IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers Cancers Ewing sarcoma biomarker pIGF-1R PET/CT drug response biological therapies |
author_facet |
Hesham M. Amin Ajaykumar C. Morani Najat C. Daw Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi Vivek Subbiah Brian A. Menegaz Deeksha Vishwamitra Ghazaleh Eskandari Bhawana George Robert S. Benjamin Shreyaskumar Patel Juhee Song Alexander J. Lazar Wei-Lien Wang Razelle Kurzrock Alberto Pappo Peter M. Anderson Gary K. Schwartz Dejka Araujo Branko Cuglievan Ravin Ratan David McCall Sana Mohiuddin John A. Livingston Eric R. Molina Aung Naing Joseph A. Ludwig |
author_sort |
Hesham M. Amin |
title |
IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers |
title_short |
IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers |
title_full |
IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers |
title_fullStr |
IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed |
IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive Biomarkers |
title_sort |
igf-1r/mtor targeted therapy for ewing sarcoma: a meta-analysis of five igf-1r-related trials matched to proteomic and radiologic predictive biomarkers |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Cancers |
issn |
2072-6694 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
<i>Background </i>: Ten to fourteen percent of Ewing sarcoma (ES) study participants treated nationwide with IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)-targeted antibodies achieved tumor regression. Despite this success, low response rates and short response durations (approximately 7-weeks) have slowed the development of this therapy. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a meta-analysis of five phase-1b/2 ES-oriented trials that evaluated the anticancer activity of IGF-1R antibodies +/− mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). Our meta-analysis provided a head-to-head comparison of the clinical benefits of IGF-1R antibodies vs. the IGF-1R/mTOR-targeted combination. Available pretreatment clinical samples were semi-quantitatively scored using immunohistochemistry to detect proteins in the IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway linked to clinical response. Early PET/CT imaging, obtained within the first 2 weeks (median 10 days), were examined to determine if reduced FDG avidity was predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). <i>Results</i>: Among 56 ES patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) with IGF-1R antibodies, our analysis revealed a significant ~two-fold improvement in PFS that favored a combination of IGF-1R/mTORi therapy (1.6 vs. 3.3-months, <i>p</i> = 0.042). Low pIGF-1R in the pretreatment specimens was associated with treatment response. Reduced total-lesion glycolysis more accurately predicted the IGF-1R response than other previously reported radiological biomarkers. <i>Conclusion</i>: Synergistic drug combinations, and newly identified proteomic or radiological biomarkers of IGF-1R response, may be incorporated into future IGF-1R-related trials to improve the response rate in ES patients. |
topic |
Ewing sarcoma biomarker pIGF-1R PET/CT drug response biological therapies |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/7/1768 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT heshammamin igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT ajaykumarcmorani igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT najatcdaw igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT salaheddinelamhamedicherradi igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT viveksubbiah igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT brianamenegaz igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT deekshavishwamitra igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT ghazaleheskandari igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT bhawanageorge igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT robertsbenjamin igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT shreyaskumarpatel igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT juheesong igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT alexanderjlazar igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT weilienwang igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT razellekurzrock igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT albertopappo igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT petermanderson igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT garykschwartz igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT dejkaaraujo igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT brankocuglievan igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT ravinratan igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT davidmccall igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT sanamohiuddin igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT johnalivingston igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT ericrmolina igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT aungnaing igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers AT josephaludwig igf1rmtortargetedtherapyforewingsarcomaametaanalysisoffiveigf1rrelatedtrialsmatchedtoproteomicandradiologicpredictivebiomarkers |
_version_ |
1724735135695241216 |
spelling |
doaj-4f901aa147324dbfbd9a05ca91dd7d572020-11-25T02:51:20ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-07-01121768176810.3390/cancers12071768IGF-1R/mTOR Targeted Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma: A Meta-Analysis of Five IGF-1R-Related Trials Matched to Proteomic and Radiologic Predictive BiomarkersHesham M. Amin0Ajaykumar C. Morani1Najat C. Daw2Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi3Vivek Subbiah4Brian A. Menegaz5Deeksha Vishwamitra6Ghazaleh Eskandari7Bhawana George8Robert S. Benjamin9Shreyaskumar Patel10Juhee Song11Alexander J. Lazar12Wei-Lien Wang13Razelle Kurzrock14Alberto Pappo15Peter M. Anderson16Gary K. Schwartz17Dejka Araujo18Branko Cuglievan19Ravin Ratan20David McCall21Sana Mohiuddin22John A. Livingston23Eric R. Molina24Aung Naing25Joseph A. Ludwig26Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 7Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USABaylor College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Biostatistics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USACenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA 92037, USADepartment of Pathology, St. Jude’s Cancer Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USADepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, OH 44195, USADivision of Hematology & Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pediatrics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USABaylor College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 7Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA<i>Background </i>: Ten to fourteen percent of Ewing sarcoma (ES) study participants treated nationwide with IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)-targeted antibodies achieved tumor regression. Despite this success, low response rates and short response durations (approximately 7-weeks) have slowed the development of this therapy. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a meta-analysis of five phase-1b/2 ES-oriented trials that evaluated the anticancer activity of IGF-1R antibodies +/− mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). Our meta-analysis provided a head-to-head comparison of the clinical benefits of IGF-1R antibodies vs. the IGF-1R/mTOR-targeted combination. Available pretreatment clinical samples were semi-quantitatively scored using immunohistochemistry to detect proteins in the IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway linked to clinical response. Early PET/CT imaging, obtained within the first 2 weeks (median 10 days), were examined to determine if reduced FDG avidity was predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). <i>Results</i>: Among 56 ES patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) with IGF-1R antibodies, our analysis revealed a significant ~two-fold improvement in PFS that favored a combination of IGF-1R/mTORi therapy (1.6 vs. 3.3-months, <i>p</i> = 0.042). Low pIGF-1R in the pretreatment specimens was associated with treatment response. Reduced total-lesion glycolysis more accurately predicted the IGF-1R response than other previously reported radiological biomarkers. <i>Conclusion</i>: Synergistic drug combinations, and newly identified proteomic or radiological biomarkers of IGF-1R response, may be incorporated into future IGF-1R-related trials to improve the response rate in ES patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/7/1768Ewing sarcomabiomarkerpIGF-1RPET/CTdrug responsebiological therapies |