Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach
The theory of language must predict the possible thought—signal (or meaning—sound or sign) pairings of a language. We argue for a Meaning First architecture of language where a thought structure is generated first. The thought structure is then realized using language to communicate the thought, to...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571295/full |
id |
doaj-4fa5e9030eb64977b705763a745cd8e4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4fa5e9030eb64977b705763a745cd8e42020-11-25T04:10:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-11-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.571295571295Generative Grammar: A Meaning First ApproachUli Sauerland0Artemis Alexiadou1Artemis Alexiadou2Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS), Berlin, GermanyLeibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS), Berlin, GermanyEnglish Linguistics, Institute of English and American Studies, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyThe theory of language must predict the possible thought—signal (or meaning—sound or sign) pairings of a language. We argue for a Meaning First architecture of language where a thought structure is generated first. The thought structure is then realized using language to communicate the thought, to memorize it, or perhaps with another purpose. Our view contrasts with the T-model architecture of mainstream generative grammar, according to which distinct phrase-structural representations—Phonetic Form (PF) for articulation, Logical Form (LF) for interpretation—are generated within the grammar. At the same time, our view differs from early transformational grammar and generative semantics: We view the relationship between the thought structure and the corresponding signal as one of compression. We specify a formal sketch of compression as a choice between multiple possible pronounciations balancing the desire to transmit information against the effort of pronounciation. The Meaning First architecture allows a greater degree of independence between thought structures and the linguistic signal. We present three arguments favoring this type of independence. First we argue that scopal properties can be better explained if we only compare thought structures independent of the their realization as a sentence. Secondly, we argue that Meaning First architecture allows contentful late insertion, an idea that has been argued for in Distributed Morphology already, but as we argue is also motivated by the division of the logical and socio-emotive meaning content of language. Finally, we show that only the Meaning First architecture provides a satisfying account of the mixing of multiple languages by multilingual speakers, especially for cases of simultaneous articulation across two modalities in bimodal speakers. Our view of the structure of grammar leads to a reassessment of priorities in linguistic analyses: while current mainstream work is often focused on establishing one-to-one relationships between concepts and morphemes, our view makes it plausible that primitive concepts are frequently marked indirectly or unpronounced entirely. Our view therefore assigns great value to the understanding of logical primitives and of compression.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571295/fullgenerationcognitionsemanticssyntaxmorphologysociolinguistics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Uli Sauerland Artemis Alexiadou Artemis Alexiadou |
spellingShingle |
Uli Sauerland Artemis Alexiadou Artemis Alexiadou Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach Frontiers in Psychology generation cognition semantics syntax morphology sociolinguistics |
author_facet |
Uli Sauerland Artemis Alexiadou Artemis Alexiadou |
author_sort |
Uli Sauerland |
title |
Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach |
title_short |
Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach |
title_full |
Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach |
title_fullStr |
Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach |
title_sort |
generative grammar: a meaning first approach |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
The theory of language must predict the possible thought—signal (or meaning—sound or sign) pairings of a language. We argue for a Meaning First architecture of language where a thought structure is generated first. The thought structure is then realized using language to communicate the thought, to memorize it, or perhaps with another purpose. Our view contrasts with the T-model architecture of mainstream generative grammar, according to which distinct phrase-structural representations—Phonetic Form (PF) for articulation, Logical Form (LF) for interpretation—are generated within the grammar. At the same time, our view differs from early transformational grammar and generative semantics: We view the relationship between the thought structure and the corresponding signal as one of compression. We specify a formal sketch of compression as a choice between multiple possible pronounciations balancing the desire to transmit information against the effort of pronounciation. The Meaning First architecture allows a greater degree of independence between thought structures and the linguistic signal. We present three arguments favoring this type of independence. First we argue that scopal properties can be better explained if we only compare thought structures independent of the their realization as a sentence. Secondly, we argue that Meaning First architecture allows contentful late insertion, an idea that has been argued for in Distributed Morphology already, but as we argue is also motivated by the division of the logical and socio-emotive meaning content of language. Finally, we show that only the Meaning First architecture provides a satisfying account of the mixing of multiple languages by multilingual speakers, especially for cases of simultaneous articulation across two modalities in bimodal speakers. Our view of the structure of grammar leads to a reassessment of priorities in linguistic analyses: while current mainstream work is often focused on establishing one-to-one relationships between concepts and morphemes, our view makes it plausible that primitive concepts are frequently marked indirectly or unpronounced entirely. Our view therefore assigns great value to the understanding of logical primitives and of compression. |
topic |
generation cognition semantics syntax morphology sociolinguistics |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571295/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ulisauerland generativegrammarameaningfirstapproach AT artemisalexiadou generativegrammarameaningfirstapproach AT artemisalexiadou generativegrammarameaningfirstapproach |
_version_ |
1724419367540621312 |