An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature

Within orthopedics, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been rapidly increasing in popularity, however, its true effectiveness has yet to be fully established. Several studies find that injecting PRP to the site of injury does not provide any significant benefit with respect to clinical outcom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hussain Nasir, Johal Herman, Bhandari Mohit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:SICOT-J
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017036
id doaj-4fc27b7ff35d4db4b323414608ecc84a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fc27b7ff35d4db4b323414608ecc84a2021-04-02T10:09:17ZengEDP SciencesSICOT-J2426-88872017-01-0135710.1051/sicotj/2017036sicotj170038An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literatureHussain NasirJohal HermanBhandari MohitWithin orthopedics, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been rapidly increasing in popularity, however, its true effectiveness has yet to be fully established. Several studies find that injecting PRP to the site of injury does not provide any significant benefit with respect to clinical outcomes; however, many others report the contrary. Due to the conflicting evidence and multiple meta-analyses conducted on the topic, a literature review of high-quality evidence on the use of PRP for common orthopaedic conditions was performed. Thus far, the evidence appears to suggest that PRP may provide some benefit in patients who present with knee osteoarthritis or lateral epicondylitis. On the other hand, evidence appears to be inconsistent or shows a minimal benefit for PRP usage in rotator cuff repair, patellar and Achilles tendinopathies, hamstring injuries, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, and medial epicondylitis. There is limited confidence in the conclusions from the published meta-analyses due to issues with statistical pooling, and limited subgroup analyses exploring the substantial heterogeneity across studies. Evidence-based clinicians considering the use of PRP in their patients with musculoskeletal injuries should be weary that the literature appears to be inconsistent and thus far, inconclusive.https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017036Platelet rich plasmaOrthobiologicsEvidence-based medicineReview
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hussain Nasir
Johal Herman
Bhandari Mohit
spellingShingle Hussain Nasir
Johal Herman
Bhandari Mohit
An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
SICOT-J
Platelet rich plasma
Orthobiologics
Evidence-based medicine
Review
author_facet Hussain Nasir
Johal Herman
Bhandari Mohit
author_sort Hussain Nasir
title An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
title_short An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
title_full An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
title_fullStr An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed An evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
title_sort evidence-based evaluation on the use of platelet rich plasma in orthopedics – a review of the literature
publisher EDP Sciences
series SICOT-J
issn 2426-8887
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Within orthopedics, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been rapidly increasing in popularity, however, its true effectiveness has yet to be fully established. Several studies find that injecting PRP to the site of injury does not provide any significant benefit with respect to clinical outcomes; however, many others report the contrary. Due to the conflicting evidence and multiple meta-analyses conducted on the topic, a literature review of high-quality evidence on the use of PRP for common orthopaedic conditions was performed. Thus far, the evidence appears to suggest that PRP may provide some benefit in patients who present with knee osteoarthritis or lateral epicondylitis. On the other hand, evidence appears to be inconsistent or shows a minimal benefit for PRP usage in rotator cuff repair, patellar and Achilles tendinopathies, hamstring injuries, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, and medial epicondylitis. There is limited confidence in the conclusions from the published meta-analyses due to issues with statistical pooling, and limited subgroup analyses exploring the substantial heterogeneity across studies. Evidence-based clinicians considering the use of PRP in their patients with musculoskeletal injuries should be weary that the literature appears to be inconsistent and thus far, inconclusive.
topic Platelet rich plasma
Orthobiologics
Evidence-based medicine
Review
url https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017036
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainnasir anevidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
AT johalherman anevidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
AT bhandarimohit anevidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
AT hussainnasir evidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
AT johalherman evidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
AT bhandarimohit evidencebasedevaluationontheuseofplateletrichplasmainorthopedicsareviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724167831130472448