Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery

Objective: To evaluate the presence of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who had mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency. Methods: Adults patients who had mitral valve replacement or mitral valvuloplasty with concomitan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo Canale, Bruno Azevedo, Marcelo Goulart Correia, Ernesto Chavez, Erica Macedo, Cintia Mattoso, Roberta Lima, Juliana Vieira, Cristiane C. Lamas, Clara Weksler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Center for Scientific Research and Development of Education. 2018-10-01
Series:Heart Vessels and Transplantation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.hvt-journal.com/articles/art81
id doaj-4fd6324f1659430fa24dc2475cb732f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fd6324f1659430fa24dc2475cb732f02020-11-25T01:13:31ZengCenter for Scientific Research and Development of Education.Heart Vessels and Transplantation1694-78861694-78942018-10-012410611210.24969/hvt.2018.81art81Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgeryLeonardo CanaleBruno AzevedoMarcelo Goulart CorreiaErnesto ChavezErica MacedoCintia MattosoRoberta LimaJuliana VieiraCristiane C. LamasClara WekslerObjective: To evaluate the presence of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who had mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency. Methods: Adults patients who had mitral valve replacement or mitral valvuloplasty with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, either by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency, were consecutively included between the 2008 and 2012. Surgery was done by conventional median sternotomy. Results: A total of 99 patients were included; 20 (20.2%) had surgical ablation by unipolar energy and 79 (79.8%) by bipolar energy. There were 76 (76.8%) women, and mean age± SD was 51 ±11 years.  The median duration of AF before surgery was 41 months. Type of AF was paroxysmal in 21 (21%), persistent in 11 (11%), and long-standing persistent in 67 (67%). Mean left atrium size in the preoperative period was 5.54 ± 0.82 cm. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±12.4%. Types of mitral valve surgery were valvuloplasty (n=10), mechanical valve replacement in 30, and bioprosthesis replacement in 59. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in 39 patients. Thirty- day mortality was 8/99 (8%). Mean follow-up time was 1274 days (3.49 years). Survival was 92%. After 4 years no patient who had had unipolar ablation was in sinus rhythm, whilst 67% of those who had bipolar energy ablation were in sinus rhythm (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of bipolar energy is superior to unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients submitted to mitral valve surgery.https://www.hvt-journal.com/articles/art81atrial fibrillation heart surgery ablation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonardo Canale
Bruno Azevedo
Marcelo Goulart Correia
Ernesto Chavez
Erica Macedo
Cintia Mattoso
Roberta Lima
Juliana Vieira
Cristiane C. Lamas
Clara Weksler
spellingShingle Leonardo Canale
Bruno Azevedo
Marcelo Goulart Correia
Ernesto Chavez
Erica Macedo
Cintia Mattoso
Roberta Lima
Juliana Vieira
Cristiane C. Lamas
Clara Weksler
Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
Heart Vessels and Transplantation
atrial fibrillation
heart surgery
ablation
author_facet Leonardo Canale
Bruno Azevedo
Marcelo Goulart Correia
Ernesto Chavez
Erica Macedo
Cintia Mattoso
Roberta Lima
Juliana Vieira
Cristiane C. Lamas
Clara Weksler
author_sort Leonardo Canale
title Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
title_short Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
title_full Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
title_fullStr Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
title_full_unstemmed Bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
title_sort bipolar versus unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve surgery
publisher Center for Scientific Research and Development of Education.
series Heart Vessels and Transplantation
issn 1694-7886
1694-7894
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Objective: To evaluate the presence of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who had mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency. Methods: Adults patients who had mitral valve replacement or mitral valvuloplasty with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, either by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency, were consecutively included between the 2008 and 2012. Surgery was done by conventional median sternotomy. Results: A total of 99 patients were included; 20 (20.2%) had surgical ablation by unipolar energy and 79 (79.8%) by bipolar energy. There were 76 (76.8%) women, and mean age± SD was 51 ±11 years.  The median duration of AF before surgery was 41 months. Type of AF was paroxysmal in 21 (21%), persistent in 11 (11%), and long-standing persistent in 67 (67%). Mean left atrium size in the preoperative period was 5.54 ± 0.82 cm. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±12.4%. Types of mitral valve surgery were valvuloplasty (n=10), mechanical valve replacement in 30, and bioprosthesis replacement in 59. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in 39 patients. Thirty- day mortality was 8/99 (8%). Mean follow-up time was 1274 days (3.49 years). Survival was 92%. After 4 years no patient who had had unipolar ablation was in sinus rhythm, whilst 67% of those who had bipolar energy ablation were in sinus rhythm (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of bipolar energy is superior to unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients submitted to mitral valve surgery.
topic atrial fibrillation
heart surgery
ablation
url https://www.hvt-journal.com/articles/art81
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardocanale bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT brunoazevedo bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT marcelogoulartcorreia bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT ernestochavez bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT ericamacedo bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT cintiamattoso bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT robertalima bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT julianavieira bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT cristianeclamas bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
AT claraweksler bipolarversusunipolarenergyinthesurgicalablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithmitralvalvesurgery
_version_ 1725161767373373440