Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints

To meet the demand for efficient and reliable copper and aluminum (Cu/Al) joints in refrigeration and electric power industries, interfacial reactions in 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu joints brazed by Zn-xAl (x ranged from 2–25 wt.%) filler metals and their effects on the mechanical properties of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Man Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/4/248
id doaj-50013105e4da4deb9924a7df8c6f1ad3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50013105e4da4deb9924a7df8c6f1ad32020-11-25T01:45:56ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522020-03-011024824810.3390/cryst10040248Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed JointsMan Zhang0Faculty of Mechanical & Material Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223001, ChinaTo meet the demand for efficient and reliable copper and aluminum (Cu/Al) joints in refrigeration and electric power industries, interfacial reactions in 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu joints brazed by Zn-xAl (x ranged from 2–25 wt.%) filler metals and their effects on the mechanical properties of the joints were investigated. Microstructures and fracture surfaces were observed combining with composition analysis. For 3003 Al/Cu joints, bulk CuAl and CuAl<sub>2</sub> intermetallic compound (IMC) formed in brazing seams, and a CuAl IMC layer formed at the Cu side interfaces. For 1035 Al/Cu joints, bulk CuAl<sub>2</sub> IMC formed in brazing seams, and an Al<sub>4.2</sub>Cu<sub>3.2</sub>Zn<sub>0.7</sub> IMC layer formed at the Cu side interfaces. For both kinds of joints, shear strength increased first, then decreased with the increasing Al content. The increase in shear strength was because Al promoted the formation of Cu-Al IMC, and caused dispersion strengthening. With the excessive Al content, however, the bulk IMC became coarse and the IMC layers at Cu side interfaces grew thick, causing the joint strength to decrease due to stress concentration. The strength of 3003 Al/Cu joints was always higher than that of 1035 Al/Cu, and their highest strength were achieved by Zn-12Al and Zn-15Al, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/4/2483003 aluminum1035 aluminumT2 Cubrazinginterfacial reactionmechanical property
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Man Zhang
spellingShingle Man Zhang
Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
Crystals
3003 aluminum
1035 aluminum
T2 Cu
brazing
interfacial reaction
mechanical property
author_facet Man Zhang
author_sort Man Zhang
title Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
title_short Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
title_full Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
title_fullStr Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
title_sort effects of interfacial reactions on microstructures and mechanical properties of 3003 al/t2 cu and 1035 al/t2 cu brazed joints
publisher MDPI AG
series Crystals
issn 2073-4352
publishDate 2020-03-01
description To meet the demand for efficient and reliable copper and aluminum (Cu/Al) joints in refrigeration and electric power industries, interfacial reactions in 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu joints brazed by Zn-xAl (x ranged from 2–25 wt.%) filler metals and their effects on the mechanical properties of the joints were investigated. Microstructures and fracture surfaces were observed combining with composition analysis. For 3003 Al/Cu joints, bulk CuAl and CuAl<sub>2</sub> intermetallic compound (IMC) formed in brazing seams, and a CuAl IMC layer formed at the Cu side interfaces. For 1035 Al/Cu joints, bulk CuAl<sub>2</sub> IMC formed in brazing seams, and an Al<sub>4.2</sub>Cu<sub>3.2</sub>Zn<sub>0.7</sub> IMC layer formed at the Cu side interfaces. For both kinds of joints, shear strength increased first, then decreased with the increasing Al content. The increase in shear strength was because Al promoted the formation of Cu-Al IMC, and caused dispersion strengthening. With the excessive Al content, however, the bulk IMC became coarse and the IMC layers at Cu side interfaces grew thick, causing the joint strength to decrease due to stress concentration. The strength of 3003 Al/Cu joints was always higher than that of 1035 Al/Cu, and their highest strength were achieved by Zn-12Al and Zn-15Al, respectively.
topic 3003 aluminum
1035 aluminum
T2 Cu
brazing
interfacial reaction
mechanical property
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/4/248
work_keys_str_mv AT manzhang effectsofinterfacialreactionsonmicrostructuresandmechanicalpropertiesof3003alt2cuand1035alt2cubrazedjoints
_version_ 1725021732074422272